510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Zeus Microwrist Robotic Surgical System and Accessories

K021152510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 24, 2002167-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Computer Motion, Inc. · NAY System, Surgical, Computer Controlled Instrument

Cleared on Sep 24, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K990144 (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., 2000) after a 167-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994.

Decided
Sep 24, 2002
Review
167 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NAY
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K930667 (1994). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K931340 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK930667 Reusable Laparoscopic InstrumentsSnowden-Pencer · 1994 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK960400 Diamond-Touch and Micro Diamond-Touch Instruments/Diamond-Line…Snowden-Pencer · 1996
  3. 1 generation backK990144 Intuitive Surgical Endoscopic Instruments, Intuitive Surgical…Intuitive Surgical, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK021152 Zeus Microwrist Robotic Surgical System and AccessoriesComputer Motion, Inc. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K930667Reusable Laparoscopic InstrumentsSnowden-Pencer199415
−2K960400Diamond-Touch and Micro Diamond-Touch Instruments/Diamond-Line…Snowden-Pencer1996—
−1K990144Intuitive Surgical Endoscopic Instruments, Intuitive Surgical Endoscopic…Intuitive Surgical, Inc.20003
0 (this device)K021152Zeus Microwrist Robotic Surgical System and AccessoriesComputer Motion, Inc.2002—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021152, 1994–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NAY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NAY device

  1. #1 K232610 da Vinci Surgical System Model IS5000, da…score 32.9 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990144Intuitive Surgical Endoscopic Instruments, Intuitive Surgical Endoscopic Instrument…
Summary page 1
…minimally invasive surgical instruments 2. The Intuitive Surgical da VinciTMEndoscopic Instrument Control System and Endoscopic Instruments, cleared to market via IC990144. 4) Description of the Device: The ZEUS@MicroWrist'" Surgical System (ZEUS System) and Accessories, consisting of a surge…
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.20003
*—A standard laparoscope with hand-held minimally invasive surgical instruments
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K990144: 20 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.2 years on median.
  • 2 of the 5 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 20 other devices also cite its predicate K990144.

How does its category compare?

All NAY devices

NAY System, Surgical, Computer Controlled Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NAY

16in 2025

2008: 42009: 32010: 12011: 72012: 42013: 42014: 92015: 32016: 82017: 162018: 152019: 82020: 92021: 112022: 62023: 52024: 102025: 162026 (partial year): 7
2007high 16 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NAY

117in 2025

2008: 189 days median2009: 253 days median2011: 191 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 143 days median2015: 99 days median2016: 197 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 152 days median2019: 73 days median2020: 212 days median2021: 61 days median2022: 57 days median2023: 141 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 117 days median2026 (partial year): 89 days median
2007high 253 (2009) · low 57 (2022)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NAY

1in 2025

2007: 112008: 32009: 12011: 22012: 12013: 62014: 252015: 32016: 12017: 12018: 22019: 52021: 32022: 32023: 2, 1 Class I2024: 402025: 12026 (partial year): 4, 1 Class I
2007high 40 (2024) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NAY

48,456in 2025

2007: 1332008: 2242009: 3802010: 6232011: 5012012: 1,5522013: 6,2172014: 6,1352015: 1,7222016: 1,0772017: 1,0492018: 1,0742019: 1,1542020: 1,5582021: 1,9972022: 5,7272023: 10,8982024: 12,8722025: 48,456
2007high 48,456 (2025) · low 133 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NAY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—11133
200841893224
200932531380
20101—0623
201171912501
2012410611,552
2013414466,217
20149143256,135
201539931,722
2016819711,077
20171610711,049
20181515221,074
201987351,154
2020921201,558
2021116131,997
202265735,727
202351412 (1)10,898
2024101264012,872
202516117148,456
20267894 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The ZEUS' MicroWristTMSurgical System (ZEUS System) and Accessories are intended to be used to assist a surgeon during procedures such as Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Nissen Fundoplication, to hold and position an endoscope, and to control laparoscopic instruments in performance of the surgical tasks of grasping, sharp cutting, blunt dissection, electro-cautery and suturing with knot placement. The ZEUS System is intended to be used by surgeons who…

Read the full statement (124 words)

The ZEUS' MicroWristTMSurgical System (ZEUS System) and Accessories are intended

to be used to assist a surgeon during procedures such as Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

and Nissen Fundoplication, to hold and position an endoscope, and to control

laparoscopic instruments in performance of the surgical tasks of grasping, sharp cutting,

blunt dissection, electro-cautery and suturing with knot placement. The ZEUS System is

intended to be used by surgeons who are trained in minimally invasive surgery, have

successfully completed a ZEUS System training program, and are certified in accordance

with their respective hospital's customary practice for ZEUS System use. The ZEUS@

MicroWristTMSurgical System is intended to be used in an operating room environment

in which the ZEUS System, the operating surgeon and patient are in the same room.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021152: Zeus Microwrist Robotic Surgical System and Accessories.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021152

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026