510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Micropaq, Models 402, 404

K021681510(k) SpecialCleared Jul 23, 200262-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc. · DRT Monitor, Cardiac (Incl. Cardiotachometer & Rate Alarm)

Cleared on Jul 23, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K002725 (Protocol Systems, Inc., 2000) after a 62-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000. 113 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 23, 2002
Review
62 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRT
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K002725 (2000). 113 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2014: 5 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2012: 3 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2020: 7 descendants cleared2015: 8 descendants cleared2017: 4 descendants cleared2019: 9 descendants cleared2018: 8 descendants cleared2022: 11 descendants cleared2021: 3 descendants cleared2024: 11 descendants cleared2023: 9 descendants cleared2025: 13 descendants cleared2026: 8 descendants clearedK002725 · Micropaq, Models 402 and 404 · Protocol Systems, Inc. · 2000200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 7 descendants3 generations forward: 13 descendants4 generations forward: 10 descendants5 generations forward: 15 descendants6 generations forward: 17 descendants7 generations forward: 18 descendants8 generations forward: 21 descendants9 generations forward: 8 descendants10 generations forward: 1 descendant K002725 · Micropaq, Models 402 and 404 · Protocol Systems, Inc. · 20000+5+10
  1. Root · 1 generation backK002725 Micropaq, Models 402 and 404Protocol Systems, Inc. · 2000
  2. This deviceK021681 Micropaq, Models 402, 404Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc. · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 108 of its ownK033378 Vital Signs Monitor, Propaq LTWelch Allyn Protocol, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 65 of its ownK121013 Connex Vital Signs Monitor 6000 SeriesWelch Allyn, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 58 of its ownK140188 Masimo Root Monitoring SystemMasimo Corporation · 2014
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 51 of its ownK142394 Masimo Root Monitoring System and AccesoriesMasimo Corporation · 2014
  7. Descendant · 5 generations on · 24 of its ownK151644 Masimo Root Vital Signs Monitoring System and AccessoriesMasimo Corporation · 2016

Showing 5 of 113 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2003: 12004: 12005: 12007: 12010: 12011: 12012: 32013: 32014: 52015: 82016: 52017: 42018: 82019: 92020: 72021: 32022: 112023: 92024: 112025: 132026: 8
2003high 13 (2025) · low 0 (2006)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 113 · See all
  • K033378Vital Signs Monitor, Propaq LTWelch Allyn Protocol, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly108descendants
  • K121013Connex Vital Signs Monitor 6000 SeriesWelch Allyn, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on65descendants
  • K140188Masimo Root Monitoring SystemMasimo Corporation · 2014 · 3 generations on58descendants
  • K142394Masimo Root Monitoring System and AccesoriesMasimo Corporation · 2014 · 4 generations on51descendants
  • K151644Masimo Root Vital Signs Monitoring System and AccessoriesMasimo Corporation · 2016 · 5 generations on24descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K002725Micropaq, Models 402 and 404Protocol Systems, Inc.2000—
0 (this device)K021681Micropaq, Models 402, 404Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc.2002—
+1K033378Vital Signs Monitor, Propaq LTWelch Allyn Protocol, Inc.20043
+2K121013Connex Vital Signs Monitor 6000 SeriesWelch Allyn, Inc.2012—
+3K140188Masimo Root Monitoring SystemMasimo Corporation2014—
+4K142394Masimo Root Monitoring System and AccesoriesMasimo Corporation2014—
+5K151644Masimo Root Vital Signs Monitoring System and AccessoriesMasimo Corporation2016—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200410
200510
200710
201010
201110
201230
201330
201450
201580
201650
201740
201880
201990
202070
202130
2022110
202390
2024110
2025130
202680
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021681, 2000–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRT device

  1. #1 K252676 The Circadia C300 System (C300)score 15.3 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K002725Micropaq, Models 402 and 404
Summary page 2
…he Predicate Device The Micropaq 400 series monitors are substantially equivalent to the Micropaq 400 series monitors cleared for market under 5 1O(k) submission number K002725. The Sp02 channel in the model 404 is substantially equivalent to the S p 0 2 channel in the Nellcor Puritan Bennett, 1nc.N-595 P…
Protocol Systems, Inc.2000—
Kept off the family treeK019821Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc. N-595 Pulse Oximeter
Not in FDA’s 510(k), De Novo or PMA lists as we hold them (a misreading, a typo, or a number FDA does not list), so it is kept off the family tree
Summary page 2
…eir Vital ViewTM 2.4 Central Station, and the S p 0 2 channel in the Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc. N-595 Pulse Oximeter cleared for market under 510(k) submission number K019821. This 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness may be copied and submitted to interested parties as required by 21CFR807.92.…
*—Criticare System, Inc. MPT 2.4 Multiple Parameter Telemetry and RF link to their Vital…
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K002725: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (113)

See all 113

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K033378Vital Signs Monitor, Propaq LTWelch Allyn Protocol, Inc.2004108
K071805Netguard Automated Clinician Alert System, Model 0998-00-1600-XXDatascope Corp.20075
K031760Viewpoint Telemetry SystemDatascope Corp.20032

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K033378 (Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc., 2004) has gone furthest, with 108 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K002725.

How does its category compare?

All DRT devices

DRT Monitor, Cardiac (Incl. Cardiotachometer & Rate Alarm): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DRT

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 62010: 32011: 32012: 12013: 12015: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 22022: 12023: 12024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 5
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRT

228in 2024

2009: 70 days median2010: 44 days median2011: 149 days median2024: 228 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 228 (2024) · low 44 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRT

1in 2024

2011: 12021: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRT

40in 2025

2007: 1132008: 992009: 1182010: 632011: 362012: 472013: 162014: 262015: 482016: 552017: 1592018: 2242019: 4472020: 502021: 852022: 352023: 472024: 292025: 40
2007high 447 (2019) · low 16 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—0113
20081—099
20096700118
2010344063
20113149136
20121—047
20131—016
20140—026
20151—048
20161—055
20171—0159
20181—0224
20191—0447
20200—050
20212—185
20221—035
20231—047
20243228129
20251—040
202651200—

What is it indicated for?

The Micropaq monitor is intended to be used by clinicians for single or multiparameter vital signs monitoring of ambulatory and non-ambulatory pediatric and adult patients in health care facilities. It is also intended for patient transport. Micropaq is intended to operate with an Acuity@ central station through wireless communication over Welch Allyn Protocol's FlexNetTM network. FlexNet connects multiple devices through hardwired Ethernet networks and…

Read the full statement (182 words)

The Micropaq monitor is intended to be used by clinicians for single or multiparameter vital signs monitoring of ambulatory and non-ambulatory pediatric and adult patients in health care facilities. It is also intended for patient transport. Micropaq is intended to operate with an Acuity@ central station through wireless communication over Welch Allyn Protocol's FlexNetTM network. FlexNet connects multiple devices through hardwired Ethernet networks and Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) to an Acuity@ central station. If the Micropaq is moved out of range or loses communication with the FlexNet network, it continues to monitor the patient, display patient data, and generate local patient alarms or alert messages.

The ECG channel is intended for five-lead ECG monitoring.

The Pulse Oximetry channel is intended for continuous noninvasive monitoring of functional oxygen saturation of arteriolar hemoglobin (SpO2) and pulse rate (measured by an SpO2 sensor).

The most likely locations for patients monitored by this device are step-down units, telemetry departments, general med/surg floors, emergency departments, and in-hospital transport. This device is available for sale only upon the order of a physician or licensed health care professional.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021681: Micropaq, Models 402, 404.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021681

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026