510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr Functions

K021801510(k) SpecialCleared Jun 27, 200224-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.1050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · EWO Audiometer

Cleared on Jun 27, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K974076 (Bio-Logic Systems Corp., 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 24-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1993. 4 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 27, 2002
Review
24 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EWO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K930328 (1993). 5 ancestors in all. 4 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor2012: 2 descendants cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant clearedK930328 · Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential Product · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1993×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K992807 (1999), K994149 (1999) K021215 · Bio-Logic Abaer Cub · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 20021990200020102020
  1. Root · 4 generations backK930328 Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential ProductBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1993
  2. 3 generations backK992807 Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer IBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1999
  3. 2 generations backK994149 Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer/ Navigator Pro.Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1999
  4. 1 generation backK021215 Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002
  5. This deviceK021801 Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr FunctionsBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK112247 A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2012
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK111618 Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2011
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK122496 Audx Pro Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2012
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK090579 Smartscreener-PLUS2Intelligent Hearing Systems · 2009

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K112247A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2012 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K111618Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2011 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K122496Audx Pro Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2012 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K090579Smartscreener-PLUS2Intelligent Hearing Systems · 2009 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K930328Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential ProductBio-Logic Systems Corp.1993—
−3K992807Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer IBio-Logic Systems Corp.1999—
−2K994149Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer/ Navigator Pro.Bio-Logic Systems Corp.1999—
−1K021215Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp.2002—
0 (this device)K021801Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr FunctionsBio-Logic Systems Corp.2002—
+1K112247A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated2012—
+1K111618Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated2011—
+2K122496Audx Pro Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.2012—
+1K090579Smartscreener-PLUS2Intelligent Hearing Systems2009—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
201110
201220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021801, 1993–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EWO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EWO device

  1. #1 K234095 OtoNova/OtoNova Proscore 9.3 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974076Sport/Audx Oae Test Instrument with Bio-Logic Ear Probe
Summary page 1
…em (reference 21CFR 882.1900). PREDICATE DEVICE: The OAE function is substantially equivalent to the Sport/AuDX predicate device ( 5 10(k) #K974076) and the ABR function is substantially equivalent to the ABaer Cub predicate device (5 10(k)…
Bio-Logic Systems Corp.1998—
*K021215Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp.2002—

Also cleared against K974076: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (4)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K112247A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated20121
K111618Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated20111
K090579Smartscreener-PLUS2Intelligent Hearing Systems20090

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.4 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K112247 (Natus Medical Incorporated, 2012) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K974076.

How does its category compare?

All EWO devices

EWO Audiometer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EWO

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 12009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 42013: 22014: 12015: 42017: 22018: 22019: 12022: 12023: 12024: 2
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EWO

173in 2015

2007: 69 days median2011: 151 days median2012: 137 days median2015: 173 days median
2007high 173 (2015) · low 69 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EWO

4in 2023

2008: 12023: 4
2007high 4 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EWO

13in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 42011: 22015: 12019: 62020: 72021: 32022: 62023: 32024: 22025: 13
2007high 13 (2025) · low 0 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EWO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200756901
20081—11
20092—01
20102—04
2011315102
2012413700
20132—00
20141—00
2015417301
20160—00
20172—00
20182—00
20191—06
20200—07
20210—03
20221—06
20231—43
20242—02
20250—013
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Bio-logic Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) and Evoked Potential (EP) product families are indicated for use in the recording and analysis of human physiological data necessary for the diagnosis of auditory and hearing-related disorders. This product, the ABaer Cub with Automated OAE and ABR, like it’s predicate devices, the AuDX and the ABaer Cub, is especially indicated for use in the screening of infants to determine hearing loss. The Bio-logic OAE and…

Read the full statement (147 words)

The Bio-logic Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) and Evoked Potential (EP) product families are indicated for use in the recording and analysis of human physiological data necessary for the diagnosis of auditory and hearing-related disorders.

This product, the ABaer Cub with Automated OAE and ABR, like it’s predicate devices, the AuDX and the ABaer Cub, is especially indicated for use in the screening of infants to determine hearing loss.

The Bio-logic OAE and EP Systems can be used for patients of all ages, from children to adults, including infants and geriatric patients. It is especially indicated for use in testing individuals for whom behavioral audiometric results are deemed unreliable, such as infants, young children, and cognitively impaired or uncooperative adults. The use of the Bio-logic OAE and EP families of products is to be performed under the prescription and supervision of a physician or other trained health care professional.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021801: Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr Functions.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021801

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026