510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer/ Navigator Pro.

K994149510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 27, 199919-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.1900

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · GWJ Stimulator, Auditory, Evoked Response

Cleared on Dec 27, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K992807 (Bio-Logic Systems Corp., 1999) after a 19-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1993. 21 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 27, 1999
Review
19 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GWJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K930328 (1993). 21 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2002: 3 descendants cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant clearedReference device: K803226 · Evoked Response Stimulators · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1981Reference device: K842543 · Evoked Potential Sys · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1984Reference device: K844992 · Bio-Logic Portable Evoked Response System · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1985Reference device: K862690 · Traveler LT · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1986Reference device: K930328 · Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential Product · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1993K930328 · Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential Product · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1993K992807 · Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer I · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 19991990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 4 descendants2 generations forward: 5 descendants3 generations forward: 6 descendants4 generations forward: 5 descendants5 generations forward: 1 descendant K992807 · Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer I · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1999K930328 · Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential Product · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 19930+5
  1. Root · 2 generations backK930328 Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential ProductBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1993
  2. 1 generation backK992807 Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer IBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1999
  3. This deviceK994149 Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer/ Navigator Pro.Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1999
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 13 of its ownK021895 Bio-Logic Master Evoked Response SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK070696 Interacoustics Assr, Eclipse System (Cabinet Name)Interacoustics A/S · 2007
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK021215 Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 4 of its ownK133012 SentieroPath Medical GmbH · 2014 · Recalled
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK021801 Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr FunctionsBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002

Showing 5 of 21 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 32003: 22004: 12006: 12007: 12008: 12009: 22011: 12012: 22014: 12015: 12017: 12019: 12020: 12022: 2
2002high 3 (2002) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 21 · See all
  • K021895Bio-Logic Master Evoked Response SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002 · cites it directly13descendants
  • K070696Interacoustics Assr, Eclipse System (Cabinet Name)Interacoustics A/S · 2007 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K021215Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K133012SentieroPath Medical GmbH · 2014 · 3 generations on4descendants
  • K021801Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr FunctionsBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2002 · 2 generations on4descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K930328Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential ProductBio-Logic Systems Corp.1993—
−1K992807Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer IBio-Logic Systems Corp.1999—
0 (this device)K994149Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer/ Navigator Pro.Bio-Logic Systems Corp.1999—
+1K021895Bio-Logic Master Evoked Response SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.2002—
+2K070696Interacoustics Assr, Eclipse System (Cabinet Name)Interacoustics A/S2007—
+1K021215Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp.2002—
+3K133012SentieroPath Medical GmbH20144
+2K021801Bio-Logic Abaer Cub with Integrated Oae & Abr FunctionsBio-Logic Systems Corp.2002—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200230
200320
200410
200610
200710
200810
200920
201110
201220
201410
201510
201710
201910
202010
202220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K994149, 1993–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GWJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GWJ device

  1. #1 K242954 Integrity V500 (Integrity, Integrity with VEMP)score 10.0 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K992807Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer I
Summary page 1
…sponse System. CLASSIFICATION NAME: Evoked Response Auditory Stimulator (per CFR 882-1900). PREDICATE DEVICE: Bio-logic Evoked Potential for ABAER 1, reference 510(k) #K992807. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE: The Bio-logic Evoked Potential family of products is intended to be used for the recording and anal…
Bio-Logic Systems Corp.1999—
†K803226Evoked Response StimulatorsBio-Logic Systems Corp.1981—
†K842543Evoked Potential SysBio-Logic Systems Corp.1984—
†K844992Bio-Logic Portable Evoked Response SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.1985—
†K862690Traveler LTBio-Logic Systems Corp.1986—
†K930328Navigator & Traveler Evoked Postential ProductBio-Logic Systems Corp.1993—

What descends from it? (21)

See all 21

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K021895Bio-Logic Master Evoked Response SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.200213
K021215Bio-Logic Abaer CubBio-Logic Systems Corp.20025
K030907Stacked Abr for Navigator ProBio-Logic Systems Corp.20031
K031009Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential (EP) SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.20031

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 6.2 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K021895 (Bio-Logic Systems Corp., 2002) has gone furthest, with 13 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GWJ devices

GWJ Stimulator, Auditory, Evoked Response: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GWJ

2in 2024

2007: 22008: 42009: 42010: 12011: 22012: 12013: 22014: 22015: 12017: 22020: 12021: 12022: 12024: 2
2007high 4 (2008) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GWJ

111in 2009

2008: 64 days median2009: 111 days median
2007high 111 (2009) · low 64 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GWJ

1in 2025

2008: 12010: 12019: 12025: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GWJ

1in 2025

2010: 22011: 52012: 12013: 12015: 32016: 12017: 432018: 242019: 52020: 32021: 32022: 82023: 62024: 72025: 1
2007high 43 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GWJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
200846410
2009411100
20101—12
20112—05
20121—01
20132—01
20142—00
20151—03
20160—01
20172—043
20180—024
20190—15
20201—03
20211—03
20221—08
20230—06
20242—07
20250—11
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) product family is indicated for use in the recording and analysis of human physiological data necessary for the diagnosis of auditory and hearing-related disorders. An auditory stimulus (click, tone, etc.) is presented to the patient’s ear through an earphone or headphones, and the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response from the patient is recorded using EEG electrodes placed on the scalp. Although this Brainstem Response…

Read the full statement (369 words)

The Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) product family is indicated for use in the recording and analysis of human physiological

data necessary for the diagnosis of auditory and hearing-related disorders. An auditory stimulus (click, tone, etc.) is presented

to the patient’s ear through an earphone or headphones, and the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response from the patient is

recorded using EEG electrodes placed on the scalp. Although this Brainstem Response is very low in amplitude (with respect

to surrounding EEG “noise™), the stimulus-response cycle is repeated many times and the resulting responses are averaged from

the time of the stimuli. The random noise averages to zero, but if the Brainstem Response signal is present, it’s signal will be

easily determined in the averaged signal.

The Bio-logic EP System can be used for patients of all ages, from children to adults, including infants and geriatric patients. It

is especially indicated for use in testing individuals for whom behavioral audiometric results are deemed unreliable, such as

infants, young children, and cognitively impaired or uncooperative adults. The use of the Bio-logic EP family of products is to

be performed under the prescription and supervision of a physician or other trained health care professional.

The feature modifications represented in this Special 510(k) are for the use of a redesigned hardware package and a Windows-

based software program to control the hardware. The functions and electronic design of the hardware are substantially the same

as those of the Predicate Device hardware. The software for control of this device is a simplified subset of the DOS-based

Predicate Device software. Together, they implement the same infant hearing screening functions and perform the same

intended use as the Predicate Device, but with improved ease-of-use. The POVR algorithm described in the Predicate Device is

implemented in the new Windows software to generally assist in test data interpretation, and specifically assist in the assessment

of signal-to-noise ratio and the quality of the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response in infants. Based on this automatic

assessment, the speed of testing may be reduced and/or the quality of the data recording may be improved, without

compromising the quality of recorded data or limiting the control and flexibility of the health care professional administering

the test.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K994149: Modification to Bio-Logic Evoked Potential for Abaer/ Navigator Pro..” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K994149

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026