510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2026

Everest Bipolar Cutting Forceps and Gyrus Bipolar Cutting Forceps

K023492510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 13, 200226-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4400Recalls 8

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Gyrus Medical, Inc. · GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories

Cleared on Nov 13, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K904993 (Everest Medical Corp., 1991) after a 26-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991. 4 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 8 times.

Decided
Nov 13, 2002
Review
26 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEI
Recalls
8
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K904993 (1991). 4 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant clearedK904993 · Laparoscopic Electrosurgical Device · Everest Medical Corp. · 19911990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant K904993 · Laparoscopic Electrosurgical Device · Everest Medical Corp. · 19910
  1. Root · 1 generation backK904993 Laparoscopic Electrosurgical DeviceEverest Medical Corp. · 1991
  2. This deviceK023492 Everest Bipolar Cutting Forceps and Gyrus Bipolar Cutting ForcepsGyrus Medical, Inc. · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK100896 Gyrus Acmi Halo PKS Cutting ForcepsGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK142759 PK Cutting Forceps for ESG-400 WorkstationGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2015
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK203277 Electrosurgical Generator ESG-410, Foot Switches, PK Cutting ForcepsOlympus Winter & Ibe GmbH · 2021 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK231777 Electrosurgical Generator ESG-410 and Accessories (WA91327U…Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH · 2023 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K100896Gyrus Acmi Halo PKS Cutting ForcepsGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K142759PK Cutting Forceps for ESG-400 WorkstationGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K203277Electrosurgical Generator ESG-410, Foot Switches, PK Cutting ForcepsOlympus Winter & Ibe GmbH · 2021 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K231777Electrosurgical Generator ESG-410 and Accessories (WA91327U, WA91327W), Accessories…Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH · 2023 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K904993Laparoscopic Electrosurgical DeviceEverest Medical Corp.1991—
0 (this device)K023492Everest Bipolar Cutting Forceps and Gyrus Bipolar Cutting ForcepsGyrus Medical, Inc.2002—
+1K100896Gyrus Acmi Halo PKS Cutting ForcepsGyrus Acmi, Inc.20101
+2K142759PK Cutting Forceps for ESG-400 WorkstationGyrus Acmi, Inc.2015—
+3K203277Electrosurgical Generator ESG-410, Foot Switches, PK Cutting ForcepsOlympus Winter & Ibe GmbH20214
+4K231777Electrosurgical Generator ESG-410 and Accessories (WA91327U, WA91327W)…Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH20232

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201510
202110
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K023492, 1991–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEI device

  1. #1 K231790 The InMode System with the Morpheus8 Applicatorsscore 32.7 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K904993Laparoscopic Electrosurgical Device
Summary page 1
…Forceps and Gyrus Bipolar Cutting Forceps This device is a Class I1 medical device. The Bipolar Cutting Forceps is a modification to the predicate devices cleared under K904993. The Bipolar Cutting Forceps is similar in construction (with the exception of shaft length) and in component materials when comp…
Everest Medical Corp.1991—

Also cleared against K904993: 11 other devices →

What descends from it? (4)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K100896Gyrus Acmi Halo PKS Cutting ForcepsGyrus Acmi, Inc.20103

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 25, 2026Class IIZ-1643-2026Nonconforming Material/ComponentOlympus identified that the Cutting Forceps contain components for which the supplier did not adequately validate the welding process. Defective welds can result in the Cutting Forceps' jaw breaking during clinical use.
Feb 25, 2026Class IIZ-1639-2026Nonconforming Material/ComponentOlympus identified that the Cutting Forceps contain components for which the supplier did not adequately validate the welding process. Defective welds can result in the Cutting Forceps' jaw breaking during clinical use.
Feb 25, 2026Class IIZ-1638-2026Nonconforming Material/ComponentOlympus identified that the Cutting Forceps contain components for which the supplier did not adequately validate the welding process. Defective welds can result in the Cutting Forceps' jaw breaking during clinical use.
Feb 25, 2026Class IIZ-1642-2026Nonconforming Material/ComponentOlympus identified that the Cutting Forceps contain components for which the supplier did not adequately validate the welding process. Defective welds can result in the Cutting Forceps' jaw breaking during clinical use.
Feb 25, 2026Class IIZ-1644-2026Nonconforming Material/ComponentOlympus identified that the Cutting Forceps contain components for which the supplier did not adequately validate the welding process. Defective welds can result in the Cutting Forceps' jaw breaking during clinical use.
Jul 1, 2024Class IIZ-2542-2024Package design/selectionFractures and breakages in packaging trays and Tyvek covers, which may result in a sterility breach
Jul 1, 2024Class IIZ-2540-2024Package design/selectionFractures and breakages in packaging trays and Tyvek covers, which may result in a sterility breach
Jul 1, 2024Class IIZ-2541-2024Package design/selectionFractures and breakages in packaging trays and Tyvek covers, which may result in a sterility breach

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K100896 (Gyrus Acmi, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.
  • 11 other devices also cite its predicate K904993.

How does its category compare?

All GEI devices

GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEI

52in 2025

2007: 502008: 612009: 422010: 462011: 352012: 392013: 482014: 492015: 472016: 642017: 522018: 472019: 482020: 592021: 462022: 552023: 652024: 592025: 522026 (partial year): 43
2007high 65 (2023) · low 35 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEI

113in 2025

2007: 51 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 130 days median2010: 109 days median2011: 135 days median2012: 133 days median2013: 136 days median2014: 103 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 108 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 93 days median2019: 93 days median2020: 105 days median2021: 146 days median2022: 150 days median2023: 104 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 113 days median2026 (partial year): 183 days median
2007high 183 (2026) · low 51 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEI

4in 2025

2007: 212008: 192009: 272010: 512011: 322012: 302013: 132014: 32015: 42016: 32017: 22018: 62019: 52020: 12021: 62022: 492023: 27, 4 Class I2024: 22, 10 Class I2025: 42026 (partial year): 8
2007high 51 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (14 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEI

7,592in 2025

2007: 2,7952008: 2,5562009: 3,5912010: 3,3772011: 4,4632012: 5,2162013: 4,8972014: 4,9082015: 4,9362016: 5,6162017: 6,0732018: 6,5452019: 7,0672020: 6,4902021: 6,3542022: 6,1032023: 7,1762024: 7,8972025: 7,592
2007high 7,897 (2024) · low 2,556 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075051212,795
20086171192,556
200942130273,591
201046109513,377
201135135324,463
201239133305,216
201348136134,897
20144910334,908
20154712344,936
20166410835,616
2017527226,073
2018479366,545
2019489357,067
20205910516,490
20214614666,354
202255150496,103
20236510427 (4)7,176
20245912522 (10)7,897
20255211347,592
2026431838—

What is it indicated for?

Electrosurgical coagulation, mechanical cutting, dissection, and grasping of tissue during

the performance of laparoscopic and general surgical procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K023492: Everest Bipolar Cutting Forceps and Gyrus Bipolar Cutting Forceps.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K023492

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026