510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2013Depuy Sigma Tibial Inserts
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer
Cleared on Feb 5, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K943462 (Johnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc., 1994) and 3 other predicates after a 118-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994. 351 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 51 times.
- Decided
- Feb 5, 2004
- Review
- 118 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JWH
- Recalls
- 51
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K943462 (1994). 4 ancestors in all. 351 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backK943462 Darwin Knee SystemJohnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc. · 1994 · Recalled
- This deviceK033272 Depuy Sigma Tibial InsertsDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2004
- Descendant · cites it directly · 324 of its ownK040166 Depuy Sigma XLK Tibial InsertsDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2004
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 158 of its ownK052472 Depuy Global Shoulder Crosslink GlenoidDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2005
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 114 of its ownK101433 Depuy Attune Knee SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 75 of its ownK092122 Global Shoulder Steptech Anchor Peg GlenoidDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2009
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 61 of its ownK061648 Depuy Graduated Compartmental Knee (GCK)DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
Showing 5 of 351 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 351 · See all- K040166Depuy Sigma XLK Tibial InsertsDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly324descendants
- K052472Depuy Global Shoulder Crosslink GlenoidDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2005 · 2 generations on158descendants
- K101433Depuy Attune Knee SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010 · 2 generations on114descendants
- K092122Global Shoulder Steptech Anchor Peg GlenoidDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on75descendants
- K061648Depuy Graduated Compartmental Knee (GCK)DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on61descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K943462 | Darwin Knee System | Johnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc. | 1994 | 8 |
| 0 (this device) | K033272 | Depuy Sigma Tibial Inserts | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| +1 | K040166 | Depuy Sigma XLK Tibial Inserts | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| +2 | K052472 | Depuy Global Shoulder Crosslink Glenoid | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2005 | — |
| +2 | K101433 | Depuy Attune Knee System | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| +3 | K092122 | Global Shoulder Steptech Anchor Peg Glenoid | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2009 | — |
| +2 | K061648 | Depuy Graduated Compartmental Knee (GCK) | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2006 | 1 |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 1 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3 | 0 |
| 2011 | 6 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3 | 0 |
| 2013 | 7 | 0 |
| 2014 | 8 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18 | 0 |
| 2016 | 19 | 0 |
| 2017 | 13 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13 | 0 |
| 2019 | 29 | 0 |
| 2020 | 29 | 0 |
| 2021 | 31 | 0 |
| 2022 | 27 | 0 |
| 2023 | 32 | 0 |
| 2024 | 37 | 0 |
| 2025 | 31 | 0 |
| 2026 | 33 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device
- #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K943462 | Darwin Knee SystemSummary page 1…IVALENT DEVICES: Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. (now DePuy) Darwin Knee System - K943462, K9500110, K961685, K971 189 DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The DePuy Sigma Tibial Inserts ar… | 1994 |
| * | K950010 | Darwin Knee System (Cruciate Substituting) Porous Coated and Non-Porous CoatedSummary page 1…re posterior lipped, cruciate retaining or stabilized UHMWPE tibial inserts with thle same articular surface and basic geometry as the tibial inserts cleared in K943462, K9500 10, K96 1685 and K971 189. Compared to the predicate inserts, the Sigma inserts have a larger distal mating surface to provide a tig… | 1995 |
| * | K961685 | P.F.C. Cruciate Retaining Knee System (Size 1.5)Summary page 1…ohnson Professional, Inc. (now DePuy) Darwin Knee System - K943462, K9500110, K961685, K971 189 DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The DePuy Sigma Tibial Inserts are posterior lipped, cruciate retaining or stabilized UHMWPE tibia… | 1996 |
| * | K971189 | P.F.C. Sigma Knee System (Size 1.5)Summary page 1…ofessional, Inc. (now DePuy) Darwin Knee System - K943462, K9500110, K961685, K971 189 DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The DePuy Sigma Tibial Inserts are posterior lipped, cruciate retaining or stabilized UHMWPE tibial inserts… | 1997 |
What descends from it? (351)
See all 3514 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0418-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0421-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0419-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0417-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0416-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0420-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0412-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0422-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0414-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0415-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0413-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | Class II | Z-0423-2014 | Device Design | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. is issuing a voluntary device correction of the HP M.B.T. Keel Punch Knee Instrument because of the potential for tabs on the connection end to fracture and be left in the patient. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1183-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1178-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1169-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1182-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1174-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1173-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1159-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1188-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1190-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1177-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1165-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1181-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1167-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1168-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1155-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1184-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1192-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1180-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1179-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1191-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1175-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1154-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1186-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1189-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1176-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1166-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1162-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1172-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1158-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1187-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1164-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1161-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1170-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1185-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1160-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1171-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1163-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
| May 26, 2005 | Not classified | Z-1156-05 | Other | An incomplete seal on the inner pouch allows exposure to oxygen, which may result in oxidation and would affect long-term performance of the implant. |
The 5 latest of 50 recalls; the web page lists all.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All JWH devicesJWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JWH
20in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JWH
55in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JWH
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JWH
9,306in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 18 | 74 | 14 | 1,305 |
| 2008 | 17 | 81 | 10 | 1,483 |
| 2009 | 11 | 168 | 109 | 1,870 |
| 2010 | 19 | 85 | 32 | 3,286 |
| 2011 | 25 | 87 | 27 | 5,133 |
| 2012 | 33 | 85 | 85 | 5,203 |
| 2013 | 31 | 128 | 31 | 6,135 |
| 2014 | 33 | 98 | 13 | 6,722 |
| 2015 | 27 | 87 | 11 | 6,881 |
| 2016 | 18 | 88 | 17 | 7,586 |
| 2017 | 25 | 118 | 61 | 12,263 |
| 2018 | 25 | 90 | 14 | 14,071 |
| 2019 | 28 | 133 | 5 | 14,987 |
| 2020 | 22 | 59 | 2 | 12,592 |
| 2021 | 24 | 61 | 8 | 9,408 |
| 2022 | 17 | 56 | 12 | 8,364 |
| 2023 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 8,947 |
| 2024 | 19 | 89 | 7 | 10,828 |
| 2025 | 20 | 55 | 2 | 9,306 |
| 2026 | 12 | 63 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Sigma Tibial Inserts are intended for use in total knee replacement surgery for patients suffering from severe pain and disability due to permanent structural damage resulting from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, collagen disorders, pseudogout, trauma or failed prior surgical intervention.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K033272 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K033272: Depuy Sigma Tibial Inserts.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K033272
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026