510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System-Piperacillin-Tazobactam 0.5/4-128/4 UG/ML

K042932510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 2, 200441-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.1645

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Becton, Dickinson & CO · LON System, Test, Automated, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Short Incubation

Cleared on Dec 2, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K020321 (Becton, Dickinson & CO, 2002) and 2 other predicates after a 41-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2002.

Decided
Dec 2, 2004
Review
41 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LON
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K020322 (2002). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2002: 2 other ancestorsK020322 · BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System · Becton, Dickinson & CO · 20022000200220042006
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors K020322 · BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System · Becton, Dickinson & CO · 20020
  1. Root · 1 generation backK020322 BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology SystemBecton, Dickinson & CO · 2002
  2. This deviceK042932 BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System-Piperacillin-Tazobactam…Becton, Dickinson & CO · 2004
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K020322BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology SystemBecton, Dickinson & CO2002—
0 (this device)K042932BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System-Piperacillin-Tazobactam 0.5/4-128/4…Becton, Dickinson & CO2004—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K042932, 2002–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LON? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LON device

  1. #1 K260619 VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefepime (<=0.06 –…score 13.3 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K020321BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System
Summary page 1
…K® System (PMA No. N50510) and BD Phoenix TM Automated Microbiology System with Gatifloxacin (K020321, May 23, 2002), Ofloxacin (K020323, April 14, 2002), and Levofloxacin (K020322, March 27, 2…
Becton, Dickinson & CO20024
*K020323BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System
Summary page 1
…hoenix TM Automated Microbiology System with Gatifloxacin (K020321, May 23, 2002), Ofloxacin (K020323, April 14, 2002), and Levofloxacin (K020322, March 27, 2002). INTENDED USE:…
Becton, Dickinson & CO2002—
*K020322BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System
Summary page 1
…Gatifloxacin (K020321, May 23, 2002), Ofloxacin (K020323, April 14, 2002), and Levofloxacin (K020322, March 27, 2002). INTENDED USE: The BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System is…
Becton, Dickinson & CO2002—
*—VITEK® System
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K020321: 102 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 102 other devices also cite its predicate K020321.

How does its category compare?

All LON devices

LON System, Test, Automated, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Short Incubation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LON

5in 2025

2007: 192008: 72009: 82010: 12011: 82012: 102013: 72014: 42016: 32017: 102018: 42019: 82020: 52021: 52022: 82023: 112024: 22025: 52026 (partial year): 4
2007high 19 (2007) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LON

90in 2025

2007: 50 days median2008: 66 days median2009: 76 days median2011: 85 days median2012: 200 days median2013: 115 days median2014: 90 days median2016: 242 days median2017: 89 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 84 days median2020: 81 days median2021: 268 days median2022: 189 days median2023: 210 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 146 days median
2007high 268 (2021) · low 50 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LON

1in 2025

2008: 12010: 1162011: 32012: 32014: 2, 2 Class I2016: 22017: 12018: 62019: 12020: 82022: 152024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 6
2007high 116 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LON

690in 2025

2007: 32008: 12010: 32011: 42012: 92013: 32014: 102015: 412016: 942017: 1972018: 5122019: 3152020: 2182021: 2322022: 1802023: 4532024: 4182025: 690
2007high 690 (2025) · low 0 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LON, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007195003
200876611
200987600
20101—1163
201188534
20121020039
2013711503
20144902 (2)10
20150—041
20163242294
201710891197
20184886512
20198841315
20205818218
202152680232
2022818915180
2023112100453
20242—1418
20255901690
202641466—

What is it indicated for?

The BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture for Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Enterobacteriaceae and most gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure culture belonging to the genera Staphylococcus and Enterococcus. This premarket notification…

Read the full statement (137 words)

The BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture for Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Enterobacteriaceae and most gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure culture belonging to the genera Staphylococcus and Enterococcus.

This premarket notification is for the addition of the antimicrobial agent piperacillin-tazobactam at concentrations of 0.5/4-128/4 pig/nml, to gram-negative ID/AST or AST only Phoenix panels. Piperacillin-tazobactam has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of microorganisms listed below, as described in the FDA-approved package insert for this antimicrobial agent.

Active In Vitro and in Clinical Infections Against:

Escherichia coli

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Active In Vitro Against:

Serratiamarcescens

koseriProvidencia

Citrobacter stuartii

Morgane/la morganai Providencia uretgrii

Proteus Proteus

mirabilisProvidencia rnirabilis rettgeri

Proteus vulgaris

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K042932: BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System-Piperacillin-Tazobactam 0.5/4-128/4 UG/ML.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K042932

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026