510(k) · Cleared
ClearedIPLAN
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Brainlab AG · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument
Cleared on Feb 9, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K041703 (Brainlab AG, 2004) after a 94-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1999. 54 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Feb 9, 2006
- Review
- 94 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HAW
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K983410 (1999). 6 ancestors in all. 54 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.
- Root · 3 generations backK983410 @ TargetBrainlab AG · 1999
- 2 generations backK020631 IPLANBrainlab AG · 2002
- 1 generation backK041703 IPLAN!Brainlab AG · 2004
- This deviceK053127 IPLANBrainlab AG · 2006
- Descendant · cites it directly · 33 of its ownK080886 Iplan RT ImageBrainlab AG · 2008
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 32 of its ownK103246 Iplan RTBrainlab AG · 2011 · Recalled
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 22 of its ownK120387 RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2012 · Recalled
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 21 of its ownK130617 RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2013 · Recalled
- Descendant · 5 generations on · 19 of its ownK140187 Ray StationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2014 · Recalled
Showing 5 of 54 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 54 · See all- K080886Iplan RT ImageBrainlab AG · 2008 · cites it directly33descendants
- K103246Iplan RTBrainlab AG · 2011 · 2 generations on32descendants
- K120387RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2012 · 3 generations on22descendants
- K130617RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2013 · 4 generations on21descendants
- K140187Ray StationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2014 · 5 generations on19descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 | K983410 | @ Target | Brainlab AG | 1999 | — |
| −2 | K020631 | IPLAN | Brainlab AG | 2002 | — |
| −1 | K041703 | IPLAN! | Brainlab AG | 2004 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K053127 | IPLAN | Brainlab AG | 2006 | — |
| +1 | K080886 | Iplan RT Image | Brainlab AG | 2008 | — |
| +2 | K103246 | Iplan RT | Brainlab AG | 2011 | 2 |
| +3 | K120387 | Raystation | Raysearch Laboratories AB | 2012 | 6 |
| +4 | K130617 | Raystation | Raysearch Laboratories AB | 2013 | 6 |
| +5 | K140187 | Ray Station | Raysearch Laboratories AB | 2014 | 1 |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 3 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device
- #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K041703 | IPLAN!Summary page 3…d effectiveness of the system. The information provided by BrainLAB in this 510 (k) application was found to be substantially equivalent with the predicate device iPlan (K041 703). Page 3 of 3… | 2004 |
What descends from it? (54)
See all 544 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
- None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
- Of its descendants, K080886 (Brainlab AG, 2008) has gone furthest, with 33 descendants of its own.
- 1 other device also cites its predicate K041703.
How does its category compare?
All HAW devicesHAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · HAW
9in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HAW
163in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · HAW
2in 2025
Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HAW
3,425in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 15 | 107 | 2 | 49 |
| 2008 | 12 | 112 | 10 | 53 |
| 2009 | 8 | 221 | 6 | 96 |
| 2010 | 6 | 138 | 28 | 299 |
| 2011 | 4 | 66 | 5 | 1,725 |
| 2012 | 8 | 178 | 4 | 986 |
| 2013 | 3 | 172 | 6 (1) | 1,290 |
| 2014 | 5 | 238 | 5 | 1,606 |
| 2015 | 10 | 232 | 3 | 1,767 |
| 2016 | 9 | 175 | 5 | 1,828 |
| 2017 | 7 | 226 | 2 | 3,505 |
| 2018 | 6 | 112 | 2 (2) | 4,439 |
| 2019 | 10 | 147 | 4 (1) | 6,062 |
| 2020 | 5 | 88 | 1 | 3,480 |
| 2021 | 9 | 168 | 4 (2) | 2,827 |
| 2022 | 7 | 128 | 1 | 1,929 |
| 2023 | 14 | 142 | 4 (1) | 2,510 |
| 2024 | 7 | 107 | 2 (2) | 3,755 |
| 2025 | 9 | 163 | 2 | 3,425 |
| 2026 | 5 | 162 | 6 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Intended Use: iPlan's indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro), including * image preparation * image fusion * image segmentation where the result is used for the creation of treatment plans for Stereotactic Surgery: - Surgery Planning The Surgery Planning is a tool for pre- and intraoperative stereotactic surgery planning based on stereotactic systems. Multiple graphical display functions and…
Read the full statement (715 words)
Intended Use:
iPlan's indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro), including
* image preparation
* image fusion
* image segmentation
where the result is used for the creation of treatment plans for Stereotactic Surgery:
- Surgery Planning
The Surgery Planning is a tool for pre- and intraoperative stereotactic surgery planning based on stereotactic systems. Multiple graphical display functions and 3-dimensional views of anatomical structures offer effective and efficient means of presenting the anatomical data for diagnostic and surgical planning. Computer-graphic simulation in various views of a chosen probe path can help prevent probe intersections with unwanted, critical structures or vessels.
The surgeon can interactively change a probe path simulation through the image slices in the software with on-line calculation of the accompanying arc settings and graphical manipulation to aid in optimizing his approach.
- BrainMAP
The BrainMAP module is a tool, which defines two and three-dimensional information about anatomical structures of the human brain for pre- and intraoperative planning of stereotactic procedures. These contours are defined and described by Talairach/Tournoux and/or Schaltenbrand/Wahren based brain atlases.
The user is provided with information about the position of the various functional and anatomical areas of the brain. These positions of the structures have to be correlated with every patients brain data. The correlation is defined by a procedure defined by Talairach/Tournoux. Using their grid system to divide the brain in particular areas, the program will be able to provide matching data for different patient data. BrainMAP may be used alone or in conjunction with neurosurgery.
- Functional Planning
The Functional Planning is based on Surgery Planning, which gives two- and three dimensional online information of a stereotactical surgical instrument (electrodes) for a neurosurgical functional treatment using a stereotactic arc. The user is provided with information by numerical results and by various displays and reconstruction planes based on patient images (CT, MRI, PET, SPECT) about the position and orientation relative to the patient of his surgical instrument to perform stimulation and treatment on brain structures or to a preplanned trajectory.
The software is capable of displaying the trajectory and functional areas of the brain based on BrainMAP online on the screen and recording the stimulations by storing positions of the electrodes.
The Functional Planning is intended to be used with patients where measurement, stimulation and placement of electrodes in the brain (pallidotomy) are part of the treatment. The stereotactic arc system is useful for placing these electrodes or using the instruments during the treatment and in the planning phases of the functional treatment.
In addition iPlan's indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro) including
* image preparation
* image fusion
* image segmentation
where the result is preplanned data to be used by other BrainLAB medical devices such as VectorVision (for performing the planned treatment) where these medical devices are used for:
- Image Guided Surgery
BrainLAB's Image Guided Surgery system is intended to be an intraoperative image guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery where the image guided surgery system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be considered to be appropriate and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, a long bone, or vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT, X-ray or MR based model of the anatomy.
Example procedures include but are not limited to:
* Cranial procedures
* Spine procedures
* ENT procedures
- FiberTracking
FiberTracking's indication for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on MRI scanned with diffusion-weighted sequences. These diffusion images are used for the calculation and display of fiber bundles in a selected region of interest. The created treatment plans of iPlan! FiberTracking can be used with other iPlan! treatment plans and other BrainLAB medical devices such as VectorVision, where this medical device is used for image guided surgery.
- BOLD MRI
iPlan BOLD MRI indication for use is to prepare image data based on BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) MRI scan studies and display the result as parametric images. When interpreted by a trained physician or surgeon this information may be used with other anatomical information for planning and image guided surgery.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K053127 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K053127: IPLAN.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K053127
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026