510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IPLAN

K053127510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 9, 200694-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Brainlab AG · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Feb 9, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K041703 (Brainlab AG, 2004) after a 94-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1999. 54 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 9, 2006
Review
94 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K983410 (1999). 6 ancestors in all. 54 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 3 other ancestors2009: 1 descendant cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2017: 5 descendants cleared2021: 7 descendants cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2023: 6 descendants cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2026: 4 descendants cleared2025: 7 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2022: 2 descendants clearedK983410 · @ Target · Brainlab AG · 1999K020631 · IPLAN · Brainlab AG · 2002K041703 · IPLAN! · Brainlab AG · 20041995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 3 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 4 descendants2 generations forward: 5 descendants3 generations forward: 9 descendants4 generations forward: 9 descendants5 generations forward: 5 descendants6 generations forward: 5 descendants7 generations forward: 1 descendant8 generations forward: 1 descendant9 generations forward: 2 descendants10 generations forward: 1 descendant11 generations forward: 1 descendant12 generations forward: 2 descendants13 generations forward: 2 descendants14 generations forward: 2 descendants15 generations forward: 2 descendants16 generations forward: 1 descendant17 generations forward: 1 descendant18 generations forward: 1 descendant K041703 · IPLAN! · Brainlab AG · 2004K020631 · IPLAN · Brainlab AG · 2002K983410 · @ Target · Brainlab AG · 19990+5+10+15
  1. Root · 3 generations backK983410 @ TargetBrainlab AG · 1999
  2. 2 generations backK020631 IPLANBrainlab AG · 2002
  3. 1 generation backK041703 IPLAN!Brainlab AG · 2004
  4. This deviceK053127 IPLANBrainlab AG · 2006
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 33 of its ownK080886 Iplan RT ImageBrainlab AG · 2008
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 32 of its ownK103246 Iplan RTBrainlab AG · 2011 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 22 of its ownK120387 RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2012 · Recalled
  8. Descendant · 4 generations on · 21 of its ownK130617 RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2013 · Recalled
  9. Descendant · 5 generations on · 19 of its ownK140187 Ray StationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2014 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 54 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2008: 22009: 12011: 22012: 22013: 12014: 42015: 12016: 22017: 52018: 32019: 22020: 22021: 72022: 22023: 62024: 12025: 72026: 4
2008high 7 (2021) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 54 · See all
  • K080886Iplan RT ImageBrainlab AG · 2008 · cites it directly33descendants
  • K103246Iplan RTBrainlab AG · 2011 · 2 generations on32descendants
  • K120387RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2012 · 3 generations on22descendants
  • K130617RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2013 · 4 generations on21descendants
  • K140187Ray StationRaysearch Laboratories AB · 2014 · 5 generations on19descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K983410@ TargetBrainlab AG1999—
−2K020631IPLANBrainlab AG2002—
−1K041703IPLAN!Brainlab AG2004—
0 (this device)K053127IPLANBrainlab AG2006—
+1K080886Iplan RT ImageBrainlab AG2008—
+2K103246Iplan RTBrainlab AG20112
+3K120387RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB20126
+4K130617RaystationRaysearch Laboratories AB20136
+5K140187Ray StationRaysearch Laboratories AB20141

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200130

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200820
200910
201120
201220
201310
201440
201510
201620
201750
201830
201920
202020
202170
202220
202360
202410
202570
202640
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K053127, 1999–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K041703IPLAN!
Summary page 3
…d effectiveness of the system. The information provided by BrainLAB in this 510 (k) application was found to be substantially equivalent with the predicate device iPlan (K041 703). Page 3 of 3…
Brainlab AG2004—

Also cleared against K041703: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (54)

See all 54

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K080886Iplan RT ImageBrainlab AG200833
K101627IPLANBrainlab AG201112
K080608Digital LightboxBrainlab AG20086
K093117Digital LightboxBrainlab AG20095

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K080886 (Brainlab AG, 2008) has gone furthest, with 33 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K041703.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

Intended Use: iPlan's indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro), including * image preparation * image fusion * image segmentation where the result is used for the creation of treatment plans for Stereotactic Surgery: - Surgery Planning The Surgery Planning is a tool for pre- and intraoperative stereotactic surgery planning based on stereotactic systems. Multiple graphical display functions and…

Read the full statement (715 words)

Intended Use:

iPlan's indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro), including

* image preparation

* image fusion

* image segmentation

where the result is used for the creation of treatment plans for Stereotactic Surgery:

- Surgery Planning

The Surgery Planning is a tool for pre- and intraoperative stereotactic surgery planning based on stereotactic systems. Multiple graphical display functions and 3-dimensional views of anatomical structures offer effective and efficient means of presenting the anatomical data for diagnostic and surgical planning. Computer-graphic simulation in various views of a chosen probe path can help prevent probe intersections with unwanted, critical structures or vessels.

The surgeon can interactively change a probe path simulation through the image slices in the software with on-line calculation of the accompanying arc settings and graphical manipulation to aid in optimizing his approach.

- BrainMAP

The BrainMAP module is a tool, which defines two and three-dimensional information about anatomical structures of the human brain for pre- and intraoperative planning of stereotactic procedures. These contours are defined and described by Talairach/Tournoux and/or Schaltenbrand/Wahren based brain atlases.

The user is provided with information about the position of the various functional and anatomical areas of the brain. These positions of the structures have to be correlated with every patients brain data. The correlation is defined by a procedure defined by Talairach/Tournoux. Using their grid system to divide the brain in particular areas, the program will be able to provide matching data for different patient data. BrainMAP may be used alone or in conjunction with neurosurgery.

- Functional Planning

The Functional Planning is based on Surgery Planning, which gives two- and three dimensional online information of a stereotactical surgical instrument (electrodes) for a neurosurgical functional treatment using a stereotactic arc. The user is provided with information by numerical results and by various displays and reconstruction planes based on patient images (CT, MRI, PET, SPECT) about the position and orientation relative to the patient of his surgical instrument to perform stimulation and treatment on brain structures or to a preplanned trajectory.

The software is capable of displaying the trajectory and functional areas of the brain based on BrainMAP online on the screen and recording the stimulations by storing positions of the electrodes.

The Functional Planning is intended to be used with patients where measurement, stimulation and placement of electrodes in the brain (pallidotomy) are part of the treatment. The stereotactic arc system is useful for placing these electrodes or using the instruments during the treatment and in the planning phases of the functional treatment.

In addition iPlan's indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro) including

* image preparation

* image fusion

* image segmentation

where the result is preplanned data to be used by other BrainLAB medical devices such as VectorVision (for performing the planned treatment) where these medical devices are used for:

- Image Guided Surgery

BrainLAB's Image Guided Surgery system is intended to be an intraoperative image guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery where the image guided surgery system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be considered to be appropriate and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, a long bone, or vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT, X-ray or MR based model of the anatomy.

Example procedures include but are not limited to:

* Cranial procedures

* Spine procedures

* ENT procedures

- FiberTracking

FiberTracking's indication for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on MRI scanned with diffusion-weighted sequences. These diffusion images are used for the calculation and display of fiber bundles in a selected region of interest. The created treatment plans of iPlan! FiberTracking can be used with other iPlan! treatment plans and other BrainLAB medical devices such as VectorVision, where this medical device is used for image guided surgery.

- BOLD MRI

iPlan BOLD MRI indication for use is to prepare image data based on BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) MRI scan studies and display the result as parametric images. When interpreted by a trained physician or surgeon this information may be used with other anatomical information for planning and image guided surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K053127: IPLAN.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K053127

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026