510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IPLAN

K020631510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 9, 2002194-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Brainlab AG · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Sep 9, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K003589 (Brainlab AG, 2001) and 3 other predicates after a 194-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1999. 3 of the 348 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 343 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 9, 2002
Review
194 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K983410 (1999). 4 ancestors in all. 343 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly. 3 of the 348 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 3 other ancestors2005: 2 descendants cleared2004: 4 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12008: 3 descendants cleared2006: 3 descendants cleared2009: 4 descendants cleared2011: 3 descendants cleared2021: 32 descendants cleared2014: 12 descendants cleared2012: 5 descendants cleared2015: 17 descendants cleared2013: 5 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2016: 18 descendants cleared2017: 35 descendants cleared2018: 22 descendants cleared2023: 24 descendants cleared2020: 29 descendants cleared2019: 18 descendants cleared2026: 26 descendants cleared2022: 25 descendants cleared2024: 20 descendants cleared2025: 35 descendants cleared, 2 with a Class I recall2K983410 · @ Target · Brainlab AG · 19991995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 5 descendants, 1 with a Class I recall12 generations forward: 8 descendants3 generations forward: 15 descendants4 generations forward: 18 descendants5 generations forward: 32 descendants6 generations forward: 43 descendants7 generations forward: 41 descendants8 generations forward: 43 descendants9 generations forward: 37 descendants, 2 with a Class I recall210 generations forward: 36 descendants11 generations forward: 25 descendants12 generations forward: 19 descendants13 generations forward: 10 descendants14 generations forward: 4 descendants15 generations forward: 2 descendants16 generations forward: 2 descendants17 generations forward: 1 descendant18 generations forward: 1 descendant19 generations forward: 1 descendant K983410 · @ Target · Brainlab AG · 19990+5+10+15
  1. Root · 1 generation backK983410 @ TargetBrainlab AG · 1999
  2. This deviceK020631 IPLANBrainlab AG · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 280 of its ownK040050 Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN · 2004 · Recalled (Class I)
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 278 of its ownK053610 AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 222 of its ownK121498 PercunavPhilips Health Care · 2012
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 211 of its ownK132304 Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 5 generations on · 100 of its ownK160807 EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2016 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 343 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 42005: 22006: 32008: 32009: 42010: 12011: 32012: 52013: 52014: 122015: 172016: 182017: 352018: 222019: 182020: 292021: 322022: 252023: 242024: 202025: 352026: 26
2004high 35 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 343 · See all
  • K040050Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN · 2004 · cites it directly280descendants
  • K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on278descendants
  • K121498PercunavPhilips Health Care · 2012 · 3 generations on222descendants
  • K132304Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2013 · 4 generations on211descendants
  • K160807EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Affiniti 50…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2016 · 5 generations on100descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K983410@ TargetBrainlab AG1999—
0 (this device)K020631IPLANBrainlab AG2002—
+1K040050Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN2004Class I
+2K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc.20063
+3K121498PercunavPhilips Health Care2012—
+4K132304Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.201336
+5K160807EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound System…Philips Ultrasound, Inc.201633

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200130

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200441
200520
200630
200830
200940
201010
201130
201250
201350
2014120
2015170
2016180
2017350
2018220
2019180
2020290
2021320
2022250
2023240
2024200
2025352
2026260
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K020631, 1999–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

3 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K003589Vectorvision Cranial, Vectorvision Spinal, Vectorvision Ent
Summary page 1
…Man[ Comman/Classification Name: Planning Systern/Stereotaxic Instrument Predicate Devices: Vector Vision@'Z Cranial, Spine, ENT (K 003589) Vector Vision@2 Hip (K 010602) Vector Visiona 2 Knee (K 01061 2) @target@…
Brainlab AG2001—
*K010602Vectorvision Hip
Summary page 1
…Planning Systern/Stereotaxic Instrument Predicate Devices: Vector Vision@'Z Cranial, Spine, ENT (K 003589) Vector Vision@2 Hip (K 010602) Vector Visiona 2 Knee (K 01061 2) @target@ {K 983410) Device Classifica…
Brainlab AG2001—
*K010612Vectorvision Knee
Summary page 1
…redicate Devices: Vector Vision@'Z Cranial, Spine, ENT (K 003589) Vector Vision@2 Hip (K 010602) Vector Visiona 2 Knee (K 01061 2) @target@ {K 983410) Device Classification Name: Instrument, Stereotaxic Regulatory Class: Cl…
Brainlab AG2001—
*K983410@ Target
Summary page 1
…(K 003589) Vector Vision@2 Hip (K 010602) Vector Visiona 2 Knee (K 01061 2) @target@ {K 983410) Device Classification Name: Instrument, Stereotaxic Regulatory Class: Class il…
Brainlab AG1999—

Also cleared against K003589: 6 other devices →

What descends from it? (343)

See all 343

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K040050Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500 Class IGe Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN2004280
K041703IPLAN!Brainlab AG200456
K032511Intuition ImageBrainlab AG200435
K042543Iplan! Digital TemplatingBrainlab AG20057
K041330Iplan! FlowBrainlab AG20042

Has anything in its family been recalled? (3 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K040050Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN · 2004 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2004 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K242670Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 9 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K242519Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 9 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K040050 (Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN, 2004) has gone furthest, with 280 descendants of its own.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K003589.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

iPlan!'s indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro), including - image preparation - image fusion - image segmentation where the result is used for the creation of treatment plans for Stsreotactic Surgery: -Suraery Planning The Surgery Planning is a tool for pre- and intraoperative stereotactic surgery planning based on stereotactic systems. Multiple graphical display functions and 3-dimensional…

Read the full statement (590 words)

iPlan!'s indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro), including

- image preparation

- image fusion

- image segmentation

where the result is used for the creation of treatment plans for Stsreotactic Surgery:

-Suraery Planning

The Surgery Planning is a tool for pre- and intraoperative stereotactic surgery planning based on stereotactic systems. Multiple graphical display functions and 3-dimensional views of anatomical structures offer effective and efficient means of presenting the anatomical data far diagnostic and surgical planning. Computer-graphic simulation in vanous views of a chosen probe path can help prevent probe intersections with unwanted, critical structures or vasseis,

The surgeon can interactively change a probe path simulation through the image slices in the software with on-line calculation of the accompanying arc settings and graphical manipulation to aid in optimizlng his approach.

- BrainMAP

The BrainMAP module is a tool, which defines two and three-dimensional information about anatomical structures of the human brain for pre- and intraoperative planning of stereotactic procedures. These contours are defined and described by Talairacflournoux andfar SchaltenbranWahren based brain atlases.

The user is provided &ith information about the position of the various functional and anatamical areas of the brain. These positions of the structures have to be carrelated with every patients brain data. The correlation is defined by a procedure defined by TalairacNTournoux. Using their grid system to divide the brain in particular areas, the program will be able to provide matching data for different patient data, BrainMAP may be used alone or in conjunction with neurosurgery.

- Functional Planning

The FunctionalPlanning is based on Surgery Planning, which gives two- and three dimensional online information of a stereotactical surgical instrument (electrodes) for a neurosurgical functional treatment using a stereotactic arc. The user is provided with information by numerical results and by various displays and rkmstruction planes based on patient lrnages (CT, MRI, PET, SPECT) about the position and orientation relative to the patient of his surgical instrument to perform stimulation and treatment on brain structures or to a preplanned trajectory .

The software is capable of displaying the tmjectoly and functional areas of the brain based on BrainMAP online on the screen and recording the stimulations by storing positions of the electrodes.

The Functional Planning is intended to be used w'&h patients where rneesurement, stimulation and placement of electrodes in the brain (pallidotomy] are part of the treatment. The stereotactic arc system is useful for placing these electrodes or using the instruments during the treatment and in the planning phases of the functional treatment,

In addition iPlan!'s indications for use is to prepare and present patient and image data based on CT, MR, X-ray(Fluoro) includinq

- image preparation

- image fusion

- image segmentation

where the result is preplanned data to be used by other BrainLAB medical devices such as VectorVision (for performing the planned treatment) where these medical devices are used for:

Image Guided Surgery

BrainLAB's Image Guided Surgery system is intended to be an intraoperative image guided localization systtilrn t o enable minimally invasive surgery where the image guided surgery system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be considered to be appropriate and where B reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, a long bone, or vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT, X-ray or MR based model of the anatomy.

Exampte procedures include but are not limited to:

- Cranial procedures

- Spine procedures

- ENT procedures

- Hip procedures

- Knee procedures

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K020631: IPLAN.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K020631

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026