510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Argus, Model LCM

K053207510(k) TraditionalCleared May 19, 2006184-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Schiller AG · MHX Monitor, Physiological, Patient (With Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms)

Cleared on May 19, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K012226 (Schiller AG, 2002) and 1 other predicate after a 184-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1997. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 19, 2006
Review
184 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MHX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K970879 (1997). 4 ancestors in all, the oldest K953396 (1995). 5 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant5 generations forward: 1 descendant K012226 · Monitoring System,Model Argus PB-1000 · Schiller AG · 2002K970879 · Cardiovit CS-200 · Schiller America, Inc. · 19970+5
  1. Root · 2 generations backK970879 Cardiovit CS-200Schiller America, Inc. · 1997
  2. 1 generation backK012226 Monitoring System,Model Argus PB-1000Schiller AG · 2002
  3. This deviceK053207 Argus, Model LCMSchiller AG · 2006
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK101619 Welch Allyn 1500 Patient MonitorSchiller AG · 2010
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK133973 Tempus Pro with Enhanced FeaturesRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2014
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK170567 Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2017
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 1 of its ownK173768 Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2018
  8. Descendant · 5 generations on · 0 of its ownK201746 Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies Limited · 2020 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K101619Welch Allyn 1500 Patient MonitorSchiller AG · 2010 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K133973Tempus Pro with Enhanced FeaturesRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2014 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K170567Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2017 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K173768Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2018 · 4 generations on1descendant
  • K201746Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies Limited · 2020 · 5 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K970879Cardiovit CS-200Schiller America, Inc.1997—
−1K012226Monitoring System,Model Argus PB-1000Schiller AG2002—
0 (this device)K053207Argus, Model LCMSchiller AG2006—
+1K101619Welch Allyn 1500 Patient MonitorSchiller AG2010—
+2K133973Tempus Pro with Enhanced FeaturesRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd.2014—
+3K170567Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd.2017—
+4K173768Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd.2018—
+5K201746Tempus Pro Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies Limited20207

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
200410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201410
201710
201810
202010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K053207, 1997–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MHX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MHX device

  1. #1 K251702 IntelliVue Patient Monitor MX750; IntelliVue…score 23.0 · 40 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K012226Monitoring System,Model Argus PB-1000
Summary page 1
…Monitoring System A3 Legally Marketed Device Legally Marketed Device to which this submitted device is compared: ARGUS PB-1000 System K012226 Cardiovit AT-102 K031557 A4 Intended Use The Monitoring System ARGUS LCM is for the monitoring of vital…
Schiller AG2002—
*K031557Cardiovit at-102
Summary page 1
…Marketed Device Legally Marketed Device to which this submitted device is compared: ARGUS PB-1000 System K012226 Cardiovit AT-102 K031557 A4 Intended Use The Monitoring System ARGUS LCM is for the monitoring of vital parameters such as: - ECG: Heartrate, Res…
Schiller AG2004—
†K990966Masimo Set 2000 Pulse Oximeter, Masimo Lnop -Adt-Adult/Pediatric Disposable Sensor…Masimo Corp.1999—
†K021090Oximax N-550 Pulse Oximeter,Model N-550 Pulse OximeterNellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc.2002—
†K022084Atlas Monitor, Models 200,210,220Welch Allyn, Inc.2002—

Also cleared against K012226: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (5)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K101619Welch Allyn 1500 Patient MonitorSchiller AG20104

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.8 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K101619 (Schiller AG, 2010) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K012226.

How does its category compare?

All MHX devices

MHX Monitor, Physiological, Patient (With Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MHX

8in 2025

2007: 152008: 162009: 132010: 202011: 122012: 162013: 212014: 132015: 142016: 132017: 142018: 112019: 72020: 112021: 52022: 152023: 82024: 52025: 82026 (partial year): 14
2007high 21 (2013) · low 5 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MHX

192in 2025

2007: 96 days median2008: 58 days median2009: 57 days median2010: 90 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 120 days median2014: 248 days median2015: 203 days median2016: 149 days median2017: 134 days median2018: 203 days median2019: 243 days median2020: 196 days median2021: 195 days median2022: 189 days median2023: 229 days median2024: 181 days median2025: 192 days median2026 (partial year): 205 days median
2007high 248 (2014) · low 57 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MHX

21so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 32008: 22009: 72010: 132011: 162012: 112013: 142014: 62015: 52016: 72017: 62018: 122019: 62022: 62023: 32024: 32025: 152026 (partial year): 21
2007high 21 (2026) · low 0 (2020)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MHX

3,761in 2025

2007: 1312008: 2322009: 3822010: 9552011: 9492012: 6762013: 1,9972014: 1,6092015: 1,2842016: 1,1052017: 1,1152018: 2,1572019: 1,4622020: 1,7142021: 2,4232022: 1,4702023: 2,2542024: 2,8142025: 3,761
2007high 3,761 (2025) · low 131 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MHX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715963131
200816582232
200913577382
2010209013955
2011128116949
2012168811676
201321120141,997
20141324861,609
20151420351,284
20161314971,105
20171413461,115
201811203122,157
2019724361,462
20201119601,714
2021519502,423
20221518961,470
2023822932,254
2024518132,814
20258192153,761
20261420521—

What is it indicated for?

The Monitoring System ARGUS LCM is for the monitoring of vital parameters such

as:

- ECG: Heartrate, Respiration Rate

- Invasive Blood Pressure: systolic, diastolic and mean pressure

- Temperature: temperature

- Non Invasive Blood Pressure: systolic, diastolic and mean pressure

- CO2, etCO 2 and CO 2ins

- SPO2: SPO2 and pulse rate

There is alarm handling for all parameters except temperature.

The ARGUS LCM is powered via the normal mains connection 230V/1 1OV, and

using an internal battery and an external power input.

The system is inteded for use in the Intensive Care Unit, in the Recovery Room, in

the Operation Room and during hospital internal transport.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K053207: Argus, Model LCM.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K053207

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026