510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

D-10 Hemoglobin A1C Program; D-10 Dual Program

K060001510(k) SpecialCleared Jan 20, 200617-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.7470Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. · LCP Assay, Glycosylated Hemoglobin

Cleared on Jan 20, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K031043 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., 2003) and 1 other predicate after a 17-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1993. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jan 20, 2006
Review
17 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LCP
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K926469 (1993). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest K924122 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1993: 1 other ancestorK926469 · Variant (TM) Hemoglobin a 1C Program · Bio-Rad · 1993K984268 · Variant II Hemoglobin A1C Program · Bio-Rad · 1998 · recalledK031043 · D-10 Hemoglobin A1C · Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. · 2003 · recalled1990199520002005
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 1 other ancestor K031043 · D-10 Hemoglobin A1C · Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK984268 · Variant II Hemoglobin A1C Program · Bio-Rad · 1998 · recalledK926469 · Variant (TM) Hemoglobin a 1C Program · Bio-Rad · 19930
  1. Root · 3 generations backK926469 Variant (TM) Hemoglobin a 1C ProgramBio-Rad · 1993
  2. 2 generations backK984268 Variant II Hemoglobin A1C ProgramBio-Rad · 1998 · Recalled
  3. 1 generation backK031043 D-10 Hemoglobin A1CBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK060001 D-10 Hemoglobin A1C Program; D-10 Dual ProgramBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K926469Variant (TM) Hemoglobin a 1C ProgramBio-Rad1993—
−2K984268Variant II Hemoglobin A1C ProgramBio-Rad19982
−1K031043D-10 Hemoglobin A1CBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.20036
0 (this device)K060001D-10 Hemoglobin A1C Program; D-10 Dual ProgramBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.2006—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199910
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060001, 1993–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LCP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LCP device

  1. #1 K221326 Nova Allegro HbA1c Assay, Nova Allegro Analyzerscore 9.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K031043D-10 Hemoglobin A1C
Summary page 2
…icate Devices: D-10 Hemoglobin Alc Program Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. [K031043, August 27, 2003] D-10 Dual Program Bio-Rad Labora…
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.20036
*K041444Bio-Rad D-10 Dual Program
Summary page 2
…2003] D-10 Dual Program Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc [K041444, June 9, 2004] Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc 4-A-I Indications for Use Statements and Intended…
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.20042

Also cleared against K031043: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 15, 2015Class IIZ-0695-2016Software designOn a rare occasion, there is a potential to assign a patient result to an incorrect sample ID when running in D10 Rack Loader configuration.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.7 years on median.
  • 5 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K031043.

How does its category compare?

All LCP devices

LCP Assay, Glycosylated Hemoglobin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LCP

1in 2024

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 22011: 102012: 92013: 22014: 82015: 32016: 22017: 52018: 22019: 42020: 12023: 22024: 1
2007high 10 (2011) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LCP

269in 2019

2007: 133 days median2008: 206 days median2009: 158 days median2011: 176 days median2012: 143 days median2014: 127 days median2015: 239 days median2017: 218 days median2019: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2019) · low 127 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LCP

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 32009: 62010: 52011: 512013: 42014: 22015: 22016: 62017: 12018: 12022: 12024: 12025: 1
2007high 51 (2011) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LCP

22in 2025

2007: 52008: 112009: 152010: 42011: 272012: 512013: 1932014: 1822015: 642016: 292017: 1492018: 1,9112019: 1142020: 132021: 72022: 82023: 272024: 392025: 22
2007high 1,911 (2018) · low 4 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LCP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007713315
20085206311
20096158615
20102—54
2011101765127
20129143051
20132—4193
201481272182
20153239264
20162—629
201752181149
20182—11,911
201942690114
20201—013
20210—07
20220—18
20232—027
20241—139
20250—122
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Measurements of percent HbAlc are effective in monitoring long-term glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus.

Measurement of percent HbA 2 and HbF are used for evaluation f3 - thalassemia, a hereditary hemolytic anemia.

Detection of hemoglobin variants such as S, C, D and E are effective in presumptive identification.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060001: D-10 Hemoglobin A1C Program; D-10 Dual Program.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060001

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026