510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2009

15.5FR Decathlon Coated Twin Lumen Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips

K060155510(k) TraditionalCleared May 9, 2006109-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5540Recalls 47

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spire Biomedical, Inc. · MSD Catheter, Hemodialysis, Implanted

Cleared on May 9, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K925626 (Medtronic Vascular, 1993) and 3 other predicates after a 109-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1993. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 47 times.

Decided
May 9, 2006
Review
109 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MSD
Recalls
47
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K925626 (1993). 4 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor2008: 1 descendant cleared2007: 2 descendants clearedK925626 · Maxima Plus Hollow Fiber Oxygenator · Medtronic Vascular · 19931990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants K925626 · Maxima Plus Hollow Fiber Oxygenator · Medtronic Vascular · 19930
  1. Root · 1 generation backK925626 Maxima Plus Hollow Fiber OxygenatorMedtronic Vascular · 1993
  2. This deviceK060155 15.5FR Decathlon Coated Twin Lumen Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2006
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK073093 Decathlon Gold Twin Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2008
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK063441 15.5FR Alta Gold, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, Model ALC19SH24…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK063431 15.5 FR Decathlon Gold, Funnel Tips, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K073093Decathlon Gold Twin Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips, Models DEC19SH24…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2008 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K06344115.5FR Alta Gold, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, Model ALC19SH24, ALC23SH28, ALC27SH32…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K06343115.5 FR Decathlon Gold, Funnel Tips, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, DFC19SH24, DFC23SH28…Spire Biomedical, Inc. · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K925626Maxima Plus Hollow Fiber OxygenatorMedtronic Vascular1993—
0 (this device)K06015515.5FR Decathlon Coated Twin Lumen Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter with…Spire Biomedical, Inc.2006—
+1K073093Decathlon Gold Twin Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips, Models…Spire Biomedical, Inc.2008—
+1K06344115.5FR Alta Gold, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, Model ALC19SH24, ALC23SH28…Spire Biomedical, Inc.200748
+1K06343115.5 FR Decathlon Gold, Funnel Tips, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, DFC19SH24…Spire Biomedical, Inc.200748

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199710
200010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200720
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060155, 1993–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MSD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MSD device

  1. #1 K241581 Hemodialysis Catheterscore 12.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K925626Maxima Plus Hollow Fiber Oxygenator
Summary page 3
…coating has been approved for the following legally marketed devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed: 1. Medtronic Maxima cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (K925626 and K933586) 2. Diametrics Paratrend intravascular blood gas sensor catheter (K970906) 3. Cordis Bx Velocity coronary stent…
Medtronic Vascular1993—
*K933586Minimax Plus Hollow Fiber Oxygenator (with or Without Medtronic/Carmeda Bioactive Surface
Summary page 3
…been approved for the following legally marketed devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed: 1. Medtronic Maxima cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (K925626 and K933586) 2. Diametrics Paratrend intravascular blood gas sensor catheter (K970906) 3. Cordis Bx Velocity coronary stent (P900043/S0…
Medtronic Vascular1994—
*K970906Paratrend 7 Multiparameter Senior and Satellite Monitor System with Paratrend 7 Plus…
Summary page 3
…l equivalence is claimed: 1. Medtronic Maxima cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (K925626 and K933586) 2. Diametrics Paratrend intravascular blood gas sensor catheter (K970906) 3. Cordis Bx Velocity coronary stent (P900043/S024) Performance Data: A series of physical tests were conducted to demonstr…
Diametrics Medical, Ltd.1997—
*P900043/S024BX Velocity (TM) with Hepacoat (TM) on Raptor (TM) Stent System for Coronary Arteries
Summary page 3
…ardiopulmonary bypass circuit (K925626 and K933586) 2. Diametrics Paratrend intravascular blood gas sensor catheter (K970906) 3. Cordis Bx Velocity coronary stent (P900043/S024) Performance Data: A series of physical tests were conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence to our non- treated "Decath…
Cordis Corp.2000—
*—non-treated Decathlon catheter
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K925626: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K073093Decathlon Gold Twin Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips, Models DEC19SH24…Spire Biomedical, Inc.20080
K06344115.5FR Alta Gold, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, Model ALC19SH24, ALC23SH28, ALC27SH32…Spire Biomedical, Inc.20070
K06343115.5 FR Decathlon Gold, Funnel Tips, Coated Hemodialysis Catheter, DFC19SH24, DFC23SH28…Spire Biomedical, Inc.20070

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0288-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0289-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0290-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0299-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0301-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0302-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0304-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0306-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0309-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0311-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0312-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0294-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0295-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0296-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0297-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0300-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0303-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0308-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0314-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0316-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0317-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0318-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0319-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0321-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0330-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0291-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0292-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0293-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0298-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0305-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0310-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0313-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0315-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0320-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0322-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0323-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0324-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0325-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0327-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0328-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0332-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0334-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0335-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0329-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0331-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0333-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…
Oct 23, 2009Not classifiedZ-0326-2010Process controlThere is a possibility that the catheter tubing could separate from the hub/bifurcation of the device. If this occurs, bleeding is the primary clinical complication likely to result from catheter tubing/hub separation. A second potential…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K073093 (Spire Biomedical, Inc., 2008) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K925626.

How does its category compare?

All MSD devices

MSD Catheter, Hemodialysis, Implanted: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MSD

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 32009: 62010: 42011: 72012: 22013: 52014: 82015: 12016: 22017: 22018: 22019: 12020: 42021: 42025: 1
2007high 8 (2014) · low 0 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MSD

153in 2021

2007: 92 days median2008: 89 days median2009: 81 days median2010: 116 days median2011: 70 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 246 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 153 days median
2007high 246 (2014) · low 70 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MSD

1in 2013

2008: 472009: 492010: 112011: 242013: 12026 (partial year): 4, 4 Class I
2007high 49 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (4 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MSD

1,054in 2025

2007: 1182008: 1742009: 1732010: 3062011: 2682012: 3672013: 3632014: 5062015: 5502016: 5322017: 4842018: 4632019: 6452020: 4012021: 5232022: 6102023: 5422024: 8412025: 1,054
2007high 1,054 (2025) · low 118 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MSD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077920118
200838947174
200968149173
2010411611306
201177024268
20122—0367
201351051363
201482460506
20151—0550
20162—0532
20172—0484
20182—0463
20191—0645
202041060401
202141530523
20220—0610
20230—0542
20240—0841
20251—01,054
20260—4 (4)—

What is it indicated for?

Spire Biomedical Inc.'s Decathlon Coated Twin Lumen Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips is designed for chronic Hemodialysis and apheresis. It is a radiopaque polyurethane catheter with a heparin coating, designed for percutaneous insertion or insertion via a cutdown,

The ability of the Carmeda® End-Point Bonded heparin coating to reduce dotting is supported by in-vitro and animal testing.

The catheters are offered in 24cm, 28cm, 32cm, 36cm, 40cm and 55cm lengths.

Catheters longer than 40cm are intended for femoral vein insertion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060155: 15.5FR Decathlon Coated Twin Lumen Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter with Separated Tips.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060155

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026