510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - Erythromycin-0.0625-8 UG/ML, and Quinupristin/Dalfopristin-0.25-4 UG/ML

K060218510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 17, 200649-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.1645

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Becton, Dickinson & CO · LON System, Test, Automated, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Short Incubation

Cleared on Mar 17, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K020321 (Becton, Dickinson & CO, 2002) and 3 other predicates after a 49-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2002.

Decided
Mar 17, 2006
Review
49 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LON
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K020322 (2002). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2004: 2 other ancestors2002: 2 other ancestorsK020322 · BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System · Becton, Dickinson & CO · 2002K022172 · BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System · Becton, Dickinson & CO · 200220002002200420062008
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K022172 · BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System · Becton, Dickinson & CO · 2002K020322 · BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System · Becton, Dickinson & CO · 20020
  1. Root · 2 generations backK020322 BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology SystemBecton, Dickinson & CO · 2002
  2. 1 generation backK022172 BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology SystemBecton, Dickinson & CO · 2002
  3. This deviceK060218 BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - Erythromycin-0.0625-8…Becton, Dickinson & CO · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K020322BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology SystemBecton, Dickinson & CO2002—
−1K022172BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology SystemBecton, Dickinson & CO2002—
0 (this device)K060218BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - Erythromycin-0.0625-8 UG/ML, and…Becton, Dickinson & CO2006—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200220
200420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060218, 2002–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LON? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LON device

  1. #1 K260619 VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefepime (<=0.06 –…score 13.3 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
Kept off the family treeN50510FDA’s N50510 is Vitek Systems General Susceptibility Card
Number could not be read
Summary page 1
…ntimicrobial Susceptibility Device, 21 CFR 866.1645 PREDICATE DEVICES: VITEK® System (PMA No. N505 10) and BD Phoenix TM Automated Microbiology System with Gatifloxacin (K020321,…
Biomerieux Vitek, Inc.1978—
*K020321BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System
Summary page 1
…VITEK® System (PMA No. N505 10) and BD Phoenix TM Automated Microbiology System with Gatifloxacin (K020321, May 23, 2002, Erythromycin (K033784, February 3, 2004),…
Becton, Dickinson & CO20024
*K033784BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - Erythromycin 0.0625-8 UG/ML
Summary page 1
…Automated Microbiology System with Gatifloxacin (K020321, May 23, 2002, Erythromycin (K033784, February 3, 2004), Quinupristin/dalfopristin (K022172, August 12, 2002), and…
Becton, Dickinson & CO2004—
*K022172BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System
Summary page 1
…May 23, 2002, Erythromycin (K033784, February 3, 2004), Quinupristin/dalfopristin (K022172, August 12, 2002), and Chloramphenicol (K033889, February 3, 2004). INTENDED USE:…
Becton, Dickinson & CO2002—
*K033889BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Use with the Antimicrobial Agent…
Summary page 1
…Quinupristin/dalfopristin (K022172, August 12, 2002), and Chloramphenicol (K033889, February 3, 2004). INTENDED USE: The BD Phoenix M T…
Becton, Dickinson & CO2004—

Also cleared against K020321: 102 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 4 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 3.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 102 other devices also cite its predicate K020321.

How does its category compare?

All LON devices

LON System, Test, Automated, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Short Incubation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LON

5in 2025

2007: 192008: 72009: 82010: 12011: 82012: 102013: 72014: 42016: 32017: 102018: 42019: 82020: 52021: 52022: 82023: 112024: 22025: 52026 (partial year): 4
2007high 19 (2007) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LON

90in 2025

2007: 50 days median2008: 66 days median2009: 76 days median2011: 85 days median2012: 200 days median2013: 115 days median2014: 90 days median2016: 242 days median2017: 89 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 84 days median2020: 81 days median2021: 268 days median2022: 189 days median2023: 210 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 146 days median
2007high 268 (2021) · low 50 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LON

1in 2025

2008: 12010: 1162011: 32012: 32014: 2, 2 Class I2016: 22017: 12018: 62019: 12020: 82022: 152024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 6
2007high 116 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LON

690in 2025

2007: 32008: 12010: 32011: 42012: 92013: 32014: 102015: 412016: 942017: 1972018: 5122019: 3152020: 2182021: 2322022: 1802023: 4532024: 4182025: 690
2007high 690 (2025) · low 0 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LON, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007195003
200876611
200987600
20101—1163
201188534
20121020039
2013711503
20144902 (2)10
20150—041
20163242294
201710891197
20184886512
20198841315
20205818218
202152680232
2022818915180
2023112100453
20242—1418
20255901690
202641466—

What is it indicated for?

The BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most Gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture for Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Enterobacteriaceae and most Gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure culture belonging to the genera Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus. This…

Read the full statement (249 words)

The BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System is intended for in vitro quantitative

determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most

Gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture for

Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Enterobacteriaceae and most Gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure

culture belonging to the genera Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus.

This premarket notification is for additional organism groups and BD Phoenix TM Automated Microbiology System with erythromycin (0.0625-8 pg/mL), quinupristin/dalfopristin (0.25-4

gg/mL), and chloramphenicol (1-32 pg/mL) on ID/AST or AST only Phoenix panels.

Erythromycin has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of microorganisms listed

below, as described in the FDA-approved package insert for this antimicrobial agent.

Active In Vitro and in Clinical Infections Against:

Staphylococcus aureus

Quinupristin/dalfopristin has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of microorganisms

listed below, as described in the FDA-approved package insert for this antimicrobial agent.

Active In Vitro and in Clinical Infections Against:

Aerobic Gram-positive microorganisms

Enterococcus faecium (vancomycin-resistant and multi-drug resistant strains only)

Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains only)

Active In Vitro Against:

Aerobic Gram-positive microorganisms

Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant strains)

Staphylococcus epidermidis (including methicillin-resistant strains)

Synercid is not active against Enterococcus faecalis. Differentiation of enterococcal species is

important to avoid misidentification of Enterococcus faecalis as Enterococcus faecium.

Chloramphenicol has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of microorganisms listed

below, as described in the FDA-approved package insert for this antimicrobial agent.

Active In Vitro and in Clinical Infections Against:

Staphylococcus aureus

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060218: BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - Erythromycin-0.0625-8 UG/ML, and Quinupristin/Dalfopristin-0.25-4 UG/ML.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060218

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026