510(k) · Cleared
ClearedSegmental Distal Femoral Components and Proximal Femoral Bodies with a Compress Female Taper
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Biomet, Inc. · KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer
Cleared on Jun 11, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K043547 (Biomet, Inc., 2005) and 3 other predicates after a 126-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1996. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Jun 11, 2008
- Review
- 126 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- KRO
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K945028 (1996). 9 ancestors in all, the oldest K952970 (1996). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 5 generations backK945028 Finn Knee SystemBiomet, Inc. · 1996
- 4 generations backK031804 Compress Distal Femoral ReplacementBiomet, Inc. · 2003
- 3 generations backK041352 Compress Distal Femoral Replacement SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2004
- 2 generations backK043547 Compress Segmental Femoral Replacement SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK062998 Compress Segmental Femoral Replacement System (Short Spindle and…Biomet Manufacturing Corp · 2007 · Recalled
- This deviceK080330 Segmental Distal Femoral Components and Proximal Femoral Bodies with…Biomet, Inc. · 2008
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK142814 Biomet Orthopaedic Salvage System (OSSTM) - Proximal Femoral &…Biomet Manufacturing, LLC · 2015 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK253515 Zimmer Biomet OSS™ Orthopedic Salvage System OsseoTi® Sleeves and…Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 2026
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 | K945028 | Finn Knee System | Biomet, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| −4 | K031804 | Compress Distal Femoral Replacement | Biomet, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| −3 | K041352 | Compress Distal Femoral Replacement System | Biomet, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| −2 | K043547 | Compress Segmental Femoral Replacement System | Biomet, Inc. | 2005 | 6 |
| −1 | K062998 | Compress Segmental Femoral Replacement System (Short Spindle and Anchor Plug) | Biomet Manufacturing Corp | 2007 | 21 |
| 0 (this device) | K080330 | Segmental Distal Femoral Components and Proximal Femoral Bodies with a… | Biomet, Inc. | 2008 | — |
| +1 | K142814 | Biomet Orthopaedic Salvage System (OSSTM) - Proximal Femoral & Hybrid Tibial | Biomet Manufacturing, LLC | 2015 | 6 |
| +2 | K253515 | Zimmer Biomet OSS™ Orthopedic Salvage System OsseoTi® Sleeves and Augments | Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. | 2026 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new KRO device
- #1 K251665 Triathlon® Hinge Knee Systemscore 19.0 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K043547 | Compress Segmental Femoral Replacement SystemSummary page 1…rained, Cemented Prosthesis (21 CFR §888.3510) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: * Compress® Segmental Femoral Replacement System K043547 & K062998 * Orthopedic Salvage System (OSSTM) K002757& K052685 Device Description: The Segmental Distal Femora… | 2005 |
| * | K062998 | Compress Segmental Femoral Replacement System (Short Spindle and Anchor Plug)Summary page 1…mented Prosthesis (21 CFR §888.3510) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: * Compress® Segmental Femoral Replacement System K043547 & K062998 * Orthopedic Salvage System (OSSTM) K002757& K052685 Device Description: The Segmental Distal Femoral Componen… | 2007 |
| * | K002757 | Oncology Salvage SystemSummary page 1…es To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: * Compress® Segmental Femoral Replacement System K043547 & K062998 * Orthopedic Salvage System (OSSTM) K002757& K052685 Device Description: The Segmental Distal Femoral Components with a Compress® Female Taper are designed to replace the d… | 2000 |
| * | K052685 | Orthopedic Salvage System- OssSummary page 1…ch Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: * Compress® Segmental Femoral Replacement System K043547 & K062998 * Orthopedic Salvage System (OSSTM) K002757& K052685 Device Description: The Segmental Distal Femoral Components with a Compress® Female Taper are designed to replace the distal end… | 2005 |
What descends from it? (2)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K142814 | Biomet Orthopaedic Salvage System (OSSTM) - Proximal Femoral & Hybrid Tibial | 2015 | 1 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
- 5 of the 9 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K142814 (Biomet Manufacturing, LLC, 2015) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
- 2 other devices also cite its predicate K043547.
How does its category compare?
All KRO devicesKRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · KRO
3in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KRO
56in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KRO
14so far in 2026, the most since 2007
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · KRO
915in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code KRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | — | 1 | 37 |
| 2008 | 3 | 126 | 3 | 44 |
| 2009 | 3 | 86 | 8 | 66 |
| 2010 | 1 | — | 0 | 110 |
| 2011 | 2 | — | 1 | 119 |
| 2012 | 2 | — | 1 | 173 |
| 2013 | 3 | 189 | 2 | 194 |
| 2014 | 2 | — | 0 | 406 |
| 2015 | 6 | 113 | 1 | 333 |
| 2016 | 3 | 148 | 5 | 369 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 4 | 543 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 1 | 614 |
| 2019 | 3 | 244 | 0 | 759 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 749 |
| 2021 | 3 | 57 | 1 | 770 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 892 |
| 2023 | 4 | 148 | 0 | 746 |
| 2024 | 3 | 87 | 0 | 855 |
| 2025 | 3 | 56 | 1 | 915 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 14 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Biomet's Segmental Distal Femoral Components are intended for use in total knee replacement and the Proximal Femoral Bodies are intended for use in hip replacement procedures. Specific indications for these devices are: 1. Painful and disabled joint resulting from avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or traumatic arthritis. 2. Correction of varus, valgus or post traumatic deformity 3. Correction of revision of unsuccessful osteotomy…
Read the full statement (167 words)
Biomet's Segmental Distal Femoral Components are intended for use in total knee replacement and the Proximal Femoral Bodies are intended for use in hip replacement procedures. Specific indications for these devices are:
1. Painful and disabled joint resulting from avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or traumatic arthritis.
2. Correction of varus, valgus or post traumatic deformity
3. Correction of revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or previous joint replacement.
4. Ligament deficiencies
5. Tumor resections
6. Treatment of non-unions, femoral neck and trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques
7. Revision of previously failed total joint arthroplasty
8. Trauma
These devices are to be used with bone cement unless a proximal femur is indicated for use (USA)
When used with Biomet's Compress ® Segmental Femoral Replacement System, the indications for use are uncemented application in cases of:
1. Correction of revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or previous joint replacement.
2. Tumor resections.
3. Revision of previously failed total joint arthroplasty.
4. Trauma.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K080330 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K080330: Segmental Distal Femoral Components and Proximal Femoral Bodies with a Compress Female Taper.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080330
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026