510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Sierra System

K080526510(k) SpecialCleared Apr 16, 200850-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Seaspine, Inc. · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Apr 16, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K062934 (Seaspine, Inc., 2006) and 3 other predicates after a 50-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1985. 9 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 16, 2008
Review
50 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K853033 (1985). 34 ancestors in all. 9 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 10 generations backK853033 Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation SystemA.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd. · 1985
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK041203 Summit Oct Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  4. 2 generations backK042508 Sumit Oct Spinal System and Mountaineer Oct Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  5. 1 generation backK062934 SierraSeaspine, Inc. · 2006
  6. This deviceK080526 Sierra SystemSeaspine, Inc. · 2008
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK133698 Synapse SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC · 2014
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK141897 Synapse System, Synthes OC Fusion SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC · 2014
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK142867 Reliance Posterior Cervical-Thoracic SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2015
  10. Descendant · 4 generations on · 2 of its ownK213394 Vy Spine™ VySpan™ PCT SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2021
  11. Descendant · 5 generations on · 1 of its ownK223852 VySpan™ PCT SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK853033 Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation SystemA.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd. · 1985
  2. 9 generations backK965221 Ransford Cervical Fixation SystemSurgicraft, Ltd. · 1997
  3. 8 generations backK982322 Synthes Spine Occipital-Cervical Plate/Rod and Hook SystemSynthes (Usa) · 1998
  4. 7 generations backK002733 Summit Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (Oct) Spinal SystemDepuyacromed · 2000
  5. 6 generations backK013222 Summit Occipito-Cervico- Thoracic (Oct) Spinal SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  6. 5 generations backK022190 Modification to Summit Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (Oct) Spinal SystemDepuyacromed · 2002
  7. 4 generations backK030103 Summit Oct Spinal System Minipolyaxial ScrewsDepuyacromed · 2003
  8. 3 generations backK041203 Summit Oct Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  9. 2 generations backK042508 Sumit Oct Spinal System and Mountaineer Oct Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  10. 1 generation backK062934 SierraSeaspine, Inc. · 2006
  11. This deviceK080526 Sierra SystemSeaspine, Inc. · 2008

Showing 5 of 9 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2014: 22015: 12018: 12020: 12021: 12023: 3
2014high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2016)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 9 · See all
  • K133698Synapse SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K141897Synapse System, Synthes OC Fusion SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC · 2014 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K142867Reliance Posterior Cervical-Thoracic SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2015 · 3 generations on3descendants
  • K213394Vy Spine™ VySpan™ PCT SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2021 · 4 generations on2descendants
  • K223852VySpan™ PCT SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023 · 5 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K853033Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation SystemA.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd.1985—
−9K965221Ransford Cervical Fixation SystemSurgicraft, Ltd.1997—
−8K982322Synthes Spine Occipital-Cervical Plate/Rod and Hook SystemSynthes (Usa)1998—
−7K002733Summit Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (Oct) Spinal SystemDepuyacromed2000—
−6K013222Summit Occipito-Cervico- Thoracic (Oct) Spinal SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−5K022190Modification to Summit Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (Oct) Spinal SystemDepuyacromed2002—
−4K030103Summit Oct Spinal System Minipolyaxial ScrewsDepuyacromed2003—
−3K041203Summit Oct Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2004—
−2K042508Sumit Oct Spinal System and Mountaineer Oct Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2004—
−1K062934SierraSeaspine, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K080526Sierra SystemSeaspine, Inc.2008—
+1K133698Synapse SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC2014—
+2K141897Synapse System, Synthes OC Fusion SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC2014—
+3K142867Reliance Posterior Cervical-Thoracic SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC2015—
+4K213394Vy Spine™ VySpan™ PCT SystemVy Spine, LLC2021—
+5K223852VySpan™ PCT SystemVy Spine, LLC2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199940
200010
200130
200250
200460
200540
200610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201420
201510
201810
202010
202110
202330
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080526, 1985–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K062934Sierra
Summary page 1
…KWP (Class II) - 888.3050 Substantial equivalence claimed to: The devices used for comparison in this summary are SeaSpine, Inc.'s Sierra Spinal System (K062934) and Interpore Cross International's Altius OCT System (K022048, K033961 and K043229). The overall design of the occipital…
Seaspine, Inc.2006—
*K022048Interpore Cross International (Ici) Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (Oct) Rod and Plate System
Summary page 1
…med to: The devices used for comparison in this summary are SeaSpine, Inc.'s Sierra Spinal System (K062934) and Interpore Cross International's Altius OCT System (K022048, K033961 and K043229). The overall design of the occipital plates in this submission is substantially equivalent to the…
Interpore Cross Intl.2002—
*K033961Altius Oct System
Summary page 1
…The devices used for comparison in this summary are SeaSpine, Inc.'s Sierra Spinal System (K062934) and Interpore Cross International's Altius OCT System (K022048, K033961 and K043229). The overall design of the occipital plates in this submission is substantially equivalent to the predicat…
Interpore Cross Intl.2004—
*K043229Modification to Altius Oct System
Summary page 1
…used for comparison in this summary are SeaSpine, Inc.'s Sierra Spinal System (K062934) and Interpore Cross International's Altius OCT System (K022048, K033961 and K043229). The overall design of the occipital plates in this submission is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. Des…
Interpore Cross Intl.2004—

Also cleared against K062934: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (9)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K133698Synapse SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC20146
K193615NorthStar™ OCT Spinal SystemSeaSpine Orthopedics Corporation20201
K231654NorthStar OCT SystemSeaspine, Inc.20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 1 of the 34 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K133698 (Synthes USA Products, LLC, 2014) has gone furthest, with 6 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K062934.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The intended use of the Sierra spinal system is to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3). The indications for use are as follows: degenerative disc disease (DDD) as defined by neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies, spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, atlantoaxial fracture with instability…

Read the full statement (116 words)

The intended use of the Sierra spinal system is to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3). The indications for use are as follows:

degenerative disc disease (DDD) as defined by neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies,

spondylolisthesis,

trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation),

spinal stenosis,

atlantoaxial fracture with instability,

occipitocervical dislocation,

revision of previous cervical spine surgery, and/or

spinal tumor.

The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only.

The use of the polyaxial screws is limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (T1-T3) in treating thoracic conditions only. They are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080526: Sierra System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080526

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026