510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Braemar Fusion Wireless - Ambulatory Ecg Arrhythmia Monitoring System

K081444510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 31, 200870-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Braemar, Inc. · DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia

Cleared on Jul 31, 2008 after a 70-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 31, 2008
Review
70 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DSI
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

5 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK081444 Braemar Fusion Wireless - Ambulatory Ecg Arrhythmia Monitoring SystemBraemar, Inc. · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK092947 Telesentry, Model TS01Scottcare Corporation · 2010 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK153477 EMMa Electronic Monitoring ManagementVitasystems GmbH · 2016
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK152973 Dyna-Vision Telemonitoring SystemTechmedic Development International B.V. · 2016
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK142180 TelesenseScottcare Corporation · 2014
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK111160 Intricon Datrix Centauri MT Ambulatory Patient Ecg Telemetry System…Intricon Datrix Corporation · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K092947Telesentry, Model TS01Scottcare Corporation · 2010 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K153477EMMa Electronic Monitoring ManagementVitasystems GmbH · 2016 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K152973Dyna-Vision Telemonitoring SystemTechmedic Development International B.V. · 2016 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K142180TelesenseScottcare Corporation · 2014 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K111160Intricon Datrix Centauri MT Ambulatory Patient Ecg Telemetry System (Apets)Intricon Datrix Corporation · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K081444Braemar Fusion Wireless - Ambulatory Ecg Arrhythmia Monitoring SystemBraemar, Inc.2008—
+1K092947Telesentry, Model TS01Scottcare Corporation20102
+2K153477EMMa Electronic Monitoring ManagementVitasystems GmbH2016—
+2K152973Dyna-Vision Telemonitoring SystemTechmedic Development International B.V.2016—
+2K142180TelesenseScottcare Corporation2014—
+1K111160Intricon Datrix Centauri MT Ambulatory Patient Ecg Telemetry System (Apets)Intricon Datrix Corporation2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
201410
201620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081444, 2008–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DSI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DSI device

  1. #1 K243349 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS…score 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (5)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K092947Telesentry, Model TS01Scottcare Corporation20103
K111160Intricon Datrix Centauri MT Ambulatory Patient Ecg Telemetry System (Apets)Intricon Datrix Corporation20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K092947 (Scottcare Corporation, 2010) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DSI devices

DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DSI

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 62011: 62012: 32013: 12014: 42015: 92016: 62018: 22019: 32020: 22023: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2015) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DSI

243in 2019

2007: 151 days median2008: 70 days median2009: 73 days median2010: 111 days median2011: 114 days median2012: 113 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 224 days median2019: 243 days median
2007high 243 (2019) · low 70 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DSI

18in 2025

2007: 42008: 82009: 32010: 52011: 32012: 12018: 12019: 42020: 22022: 12023: 22025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 18 (2025) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DSI

712in 2025

2007: 642008: 1562009: 2792010: 8232011: 7932012: 7662013: 7952014: 1,0002015: 1,6452016: 4,3522017: 3,5942018: 3,6482019: 3,4852020: 3,0842021: 3,0922022: 1,6382023: 1,6162024: 1,3202025: 712
2007high 4,352 (2016) · low 64 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DSI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077151464
20085708156
20096733279
201061115823
201161143793
201231131766
20131—0795
2014420001,000
2015912701,645
2016622404,352
20170—03,594
20182—13,648
2019324343,485
20202—23,084
20210—03,092
20220—11,638
20232—21,616
20241—01,320
20251—18712
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The device is intended for diagnostic evaluation of patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia. The device continuously monitors, automatically generates an alarm triggered by an arrhythmia detection algorithm or manually by the patient, and automatically transmits the recorded cardiac activity associated with these symptoms for review by a licensed physician.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081444: Braemar Fusion Wireless - Ambulatory Ecg Arrhythmia Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081444

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026