510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

EMMa Electronic Monitoring Management

K153477510(k) TraditionalCleared May 25, 2016175-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vitasystems GmbH · DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia

Cleared on May 25, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K092947 (Scottcare Corporation, 2010) after a 175-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2008.

Decided
May 25, 2016
Review
175 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DSI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K081444 (2008). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK081444 Braemar Fusion Wireless - Ambulatory Ecg Arrhythmia Monitoring SystemBraemar, Inc. · 2008
  2. 1 generation backK092947 Telesentry, Model TS01Scottcare Corporation · 2010 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK153477 EMMa Electronic Monitoring ManagementVitasystems GmbH · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K081444Braemar Fusion Wireless - Ambulatory Ecg Arrhythmia Monitoring SystemBraemar, Inc.2008—
−1K092947Telesentry, Model TS01Scottcare Corporation20102
0 (this device)K153477EMMa Electronic Monitoring ManagementVitasystems GmbH2016—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K153477, 2008–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DSI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DSI device

  1. #1 K243349 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS…score 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K092947Telesentry, Model TS01
Summary page 5
…Page 1 of 5 vitasystems GmbH 510(k) Submission EMMa Sec. 5, 510(k) Summary 1. Legally Marketed Predicate Devices K092947 DSI/DRG Telesentry, Model TS01, Scottcare Corporation 2. Indications & Intended Use The EMMa (Electronic Monitoring M…
Scottcare Corporation20102

Also cleared against K092947: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K092947.

How does its category compare?

All DSI devices

DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DSI

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 62011: 62012: 32013: 12014: 42015: 92016: 62018: 22019: 32020: 22023: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2015) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DSI

243in 2019

2007: 151 days median2008: 70 days median2009: 73 days median2010: 111 days median2011: 114 days median2012: 113 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 224 days median2019: 243 days median
2007high 243 (2019) · low 70 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DSI

18in 2025

2007: 42008: 82009: 32010: 52011: 32012: 12018: 12019: 42020: 22022: 12023: 22025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 18 (2025) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DSI

712in 2025

2007: 642008: 1562009: 2792010: 8232011: 7932012: 7662013: 7952014: 1,0002015: 1,6452016: 4,3522017: 3,5942018: 3,6482019: 3,4852020: 3,0842021: 3,0922022: 1,6382023: 1,6162024: 1,3202025: 712
2007high 4,352 (2016) · low 64 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DSI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077151464
20085708156
20096733279
201061115823
201161143793
201231131766
20131—0795
2014420001,000
2015912701,645
2016622404,352
20170—03,594
20182—13,648
2019324343,485
20202—23,084
20210—03,092
20220—11,638
20232—21,616
20241—01,320
20251—18712
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The EMMa system is intended for diagnostic evaluation of patients who experience transient symptoms or asymptomatic events that may suggest non-lethal cardiac arrhythmia to support and possibly improve an ongoing treatment by the patient’s physician. Data received from battery powered ambulatory monitoring devices, triggered by an arrhythmia detection algorithm or manually by the patient, are stored and forwarded to licensed physician for review.…

Read the full statement (101 words)

The EMMa system is intended for diagnostic evaluation of patients who experience transient symptoms or asymptomatic events that may suggest non-lethal cardiac arrhythmia to support and possibly improve an ongoing treatment by the patient’s physician. Data received from battery powered ambulatory monitoring devices, triggered by an arrhythmia detection algorithm or manually by the patient, are stored and forwarded to licensed physician for review.

Contraindications of Use:

- Patients with potentially life-threatening arrhythmias who require inpatient monitoring.

- Patients who the attending physician thinks should be hospitalized.

The software is not intended to be used to trigger emergency treatment or alert chains.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K153477: EMMa Electronic Monitoring Management.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K153477

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026