510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Nubic and Rabea Devices

K082848510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 24, 2009298-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Jul 24, 2009 after a 298-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 74 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 24, 2009
Review
298 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

74 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2013: 3 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2014: 5 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2019: 5 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2018: 4 descendants cleared2017: 4 descendants cleared2022: 10 descendants cleared2023: 7 descendants cleared2026: 9 descendants cleared2025: 6 descendants cleared2024: 6 descendants cleared2020: 4 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK082848 Nubic and Rabea DevicesSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2009
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 31 of its ownK111983 Vista-S Device Model 08/06-401-Xxxxx, 08/06-402-XxxxxxZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2011
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 29 of its ownK133784 Vista-S Device, Associated InstrumentationZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2014
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 23 of its ownK110915 Cervical CageEisertech, LLC · 2011
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 22 of its ownK122444 Cervical CageEisertech, LLC · 2012
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 20 of its ownK111820 Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif CageBm Korea Co., Ltd. · 2012

Showing 5 of 74 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 22012: 22013: 32014: 52015: 12016: 22017: 42018: 42019: 52020: 42021: 42022: 102023: 72024: 62025: 62026: 9
2011high 10 (2022) · low 1 (2015)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 74 · See all
  • K111983Vista-S Device Model 08/06-401-Xxxxx, 08/06-402-XxxxxxZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2011 · cites it directly31descendants
  • K133784Vista-S Device, Associated InstrumentationZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2014 · 2 generations on29descendants
  • K110915Cervical CageEisertech, LLC · 2011 · cites it directly23descendants
  • K122444Cervical CageEisertech, LLC · 2012 · 2 generations on22descendants
  • K111820Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif CageBm Korea Co., Ltd. · 2012 · cites it directly20descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K082848Nubic and Rabea DevicesSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2009—
+1K111983Vista-S Device Model 08/06-401-Xxxxx, 08/06-402-XxxxxxZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology2011—
+2K133784Vista-S Device, Associated InstrumentationZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology2014—
+1K110915Cervical CageEisertech, LLC2011—
+2K122444Cervical CageEisertech, LLC2012—
+1K111820Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif CageBm Korea Co., Ltd.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201120
201220
201330
201450
201510
201620
201740
201840
201950
202040
202140
2022100
202370
202460
202560
202690
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K082848, 2009–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (74)

See all 74

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111983Vista-S Device Model 08/06-401-Xxxxx, 08/06-402-XxxxxxZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology201131
K110915Cervical CageEisertech, LLC201123
K111820Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif CageBm Korea Co., Ltd.201220
K122801Providence Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc.20131
K132852Peek Cage for the Vertebral SpineNeoortho Produtos Ortopedicos S/A20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K111983 (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology, 2011) has gone furthest, with 31 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the NUBIC devices are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The device is intended for use in the thoracolumbar spine (from T1 to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. The NUBIC device may be implanted singularly or in pairs and may be used with allograft or autograft. When used as…

Read the full statement (375 words)

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the NUBIC devices are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The device is intended for use in the thoracolumbar spine (from T1 to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. The NUBIC device may be implanted singularly or in pairs and may be used with allograft or autograft.

When used as an intervertebral fusion device, the NUBIC devices are intended for use in skeletally mature patients at one level in the cervical spine, from C3 to TI, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The devices are designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion and intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. One NUBIC device is used per intervertebral space. A connecting screw is available which allows the NUBIC device (without strut) to be physically attached to the SIGNUS TOSCA or TOSCA II anterior cervical plate systems if desired.

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the RABEA devices are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The device is intended for use in the thoracolumbar spine (from TI to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. The RABEA device is intended to be implanted in pairs and may be used with allograft or autograft.

When used as an intervertebral fusion device, the RABEA devices are intended for use in skeletally mature patients at one level in the cervical spine, from C3 to Ti, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The devices are designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion and intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. One RABEA device is used per intervertebral space.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K082848: Nubic and Rabea Devices.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K082848

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026