510(k) · Cleared
ClearedPeek Cage for the Vertebral Spine
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Neoortho Produtos Ortopedicos S/A · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on May 29, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K071983 (Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc., 2008) and 1 other predicate after a 260-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 2001.
- Decided
- May 29, 2014
- Review
- 260 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K003155 (2001). 39 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 11 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 7 generations between
- 3 generations backK051205 Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 2 generations backK060762 Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 1 generation backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
- This deviceK132852 Peek Cage for the Vertebral SpineNeoortho Produtos Ortopedicos S/A · 2014
Show all 11 generations
- Root · 11 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 10 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 9 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
- 8 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
- 7 generations backK031780 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
- 6 generations backK040731 Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine · 2004
- 5 generations backK042571 Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 4 generations backK050624 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 3 generations backK051205 Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 2 generations backK060762 Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 1 generation backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
- This deviceK132852 Peek Cage for the Vertebral SpineNeoortho Produtos Ortopedicos S/A · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −11 | K003155 | Vertebral Body Replacement | Osteotech, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −10 | K012254 | VBR | Osteotech, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −9 | K021791 | Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2002 | — |
| −8 | K023570 | Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2002 | — |
| −7 | K031780 | Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2003 | — |
| −6 | K040731 | Stryker Spine Vertebral Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2004 | — |
| −5 | K042571 | Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −4 | K050624 | Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −3 | K051205 | Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −2 | K060762 | Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement System | Aesculap, Inc. | 2006 | — |
| −1 | K071983 | Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace, Prospace… | Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. | 2008 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K132852 | Peek Cage for the Vertebral Spine | Neoortho Produtos Ortopedicos S/A | 2014 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 6 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K071983 | Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace, Prospace, T-SpaceSummary page 1…88.3060 ODP- 21 CFR §888.3080 Classification Panel Orthopedic Predicate Device Identification K071983 Aesculap PEEK Spinal Implant System; K082848 Nubic by Signus Device Description The… | 2008 |
| * | K082848 | Nubic and Rabea DevicesSummary page 1…Panel Orthopedic Predicate Device Identification K071983 Aesculap PEEK Spinal Implant System; K082848 Nubic by Signus Device Description The PEEK CAGE FOR THE VERTEBRAL SPINE NEOSPACE is an intervertebral body fusion device that… | 2009 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9 months on median.
- 3 of the 39 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 11 other devices also cite its predicate K071983.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The PEEK Cage for the Vertebral Spine NeoSpace PLIF, TLIF, and AUIF devices are indicated for spinal fusion procedures at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S 1, in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc conifirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDID patients may also have Grade I Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at involved levels.…
Read the full statement (218 words)
The PEEK Cage for the Vertebral Spine NeoSpace PLIF, TLIF, and AUIF devices are indicated for spinal fusion procedures at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S 1, in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc conifirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDID patients may also have Grade I Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at involved levels. Patients must have undergone a regimen of six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment in the lumbar spine. The PUPF devices may be used singularly or in pairs. All lumbar devices are to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for use in the lumbar spine.
The Cervical devices are indicated for spinal fusion procedures at one level in the cervical spine from C3 to TI for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of tihe disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). Patients must have undergone a regimen of six weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment in the cervical spine. One cervical device is used per intervertebral space. All cervical devices are to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for use in the cervical spine.
All lumbar and cervical devices are intended for use with autogenous bone graft.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K132852 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K132852: Peek Cage for the Vertebral Spine.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K132852
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026