510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Providence Cervical Cage

K122801510(k) TraditionalCleared May 24, 2013253-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Providence Medical Technology, Inc. · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on May 24, 2013 as substantially equivalent to P980048 (Sulzer Spine-Tech, 2001) and 4 other predicates after a 253-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1984. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 24, 2013
Review
253 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K841189 (1984). 50 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 other ancestor2009: 7 other ancestors2001: 8 other ancestors2008: 4 other ancestors2007: 3 other ancestors2004: 4 other ancestors2002: 5 other ancestors2006: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors2016: 1 descendant clearedK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K080728 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2008×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K083857 (2009), K091088 (2009) K111123 · Varilift Cervical Interbody Fusion System · Wenzel Spine · 201119801990200020102020
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  4. 2 generations backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  5. 1 generation backK111123 Varilift Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemWenzel Spine · 2011
  6. This deviceK122801 Providence Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc. · 2013
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK161642 CAVUX™ Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc. · 2016
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 9 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 8 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 7 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 6 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
  7. 5 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  8. 4 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  9. 3 generations backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  10. 2 generations backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  11. 1 generation backK111123 Varilift Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemWenzel Spine · 2011
  12. This deviceK122801 Providence Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc. · 2013

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K161642CAVUX™ Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc. · 2016 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−10K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−9K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−8K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K033109Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X2004—
−5K043479MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA2005—
−4K080728LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2008—
−3K083857LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2009—
−2K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA2009—
−1K111123Varilift Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemWenzel Spine2011—
0 (this device)K122801Providence Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc.2013—
+1K161642CAVUX™ Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199910
200010
200180
200250
200310
200440
200510
200610
200730
200840
200970
201210

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K122801, 1984–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P980048Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…P: Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical 87, Orthopedics Predicate Device(s): Zimmer BAKO/C (P980048B) Wenzel Varitift-C (K111123) RSB Spine Interplat…
Sulzer Spine-Tech2001—
*K111123Varilift Cervical Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…87, Orthopedics Predicate Device(s): Zimmer BAKO/C (P980048B) Wenzel Varitift-C (K111123) RSB Spine Interplate C (K092070) Signur Rabea Ti…
Wenzel Spine2011—
*K092070Interplate C
Summary page 1
…Zimmer BAKO/C (P980048B) Wenzel Varitift-C (K111123) RSB Spine Interplate C (K092070) Signur Rabea Ti (K082848) Medyssey C7 Anterior C…
Rsb Spine, LLC2009—
*K082848Nubic and Rabea Devices
Summary page 1
…Wenzel Varitift-C (K111123) RSB Spine Interplate C (K092070) Signur Rabea Ti (K082848) Medyssey C7 Anterior Cervical Cage (K121320) Device Information A. Intended Use PMT Cer…
Signus Medizintechnik GmbH2009—
*K121320C7 Anterior Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage
Summary page 1
…pine Interplate C (K092070) Signur Rabea Ti (K082848) Medyssey C7 Anterior Cervical Cage (K121320) Device Information A. Intended Use PMT Cervical Cage is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc…
Medyssey Co, Ltd.2012—

Also cleared against P980048: 53 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K161642CAVUX™ Cervical CageProvidence Medical Technology, Inc.20160

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 29 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
  • 5 of the 50 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K161642 (Providence Medical Technology, Inc., 2016) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 53 other devices also cite its predicate P980048.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

PMT Cervical Cage is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DOD) of the cervical spine (C3-C7) with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level. ODD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received at least six weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the device. Devices are intended to be used with autogenous bone graft and supplemental fixation, such as an anterior plating system.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K122801: Providence Cervical Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K122801

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026