510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Device

K090707510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 15, 2009120-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Meditech Advisors, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jul 15, 2009 after a 120-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 281 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 15, 2009
Review
120 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

281 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 3 descendants cleared2017: 15 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2020: 23 descendants cleared2018: 14 descendants cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2024: 39 descendants cleared2022: 28 descendants cleared2025: 41 descendants cleared2019: 21 descendants cleared2021: 18 descendants cleared2023: 38 descendants cleared2026: 36 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK090707 Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceMeditech Advisors, LLC · 2009
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 202 of its ownK150788 Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices, Talos -C Cervical…Meditech Spine, LLC · 2015
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 166 of its ownK160924 Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc. · 2016
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 129 of its ownK171496 Tritanium C Anterior Cervical CageStryker Spine · 2017
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 106 of its ownK180364 HD LifeSciences Cervical IBFD SystemHd Lifesciences, LLC · 2018
  6. Descendant · 5 generations on · 104 of its ownK183557 Endoskeleton® TA Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TAS…Titan Spine, Inc. · 2019 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 281 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12015: 32016: 42017: 152018: 142019: 212020: 232021: 182022: 282023: 382024: 392025: 412026: 36
2011high 41 (2025) · low 0 (2012)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 281 · See all
  • K150788Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices, Talos -C Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion…Meditech Spine, LLC · 2015 · cites it directly202descendants
  • K160924Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc. · 2016 · 2 generations on166descendants
  • K171496Tritanium C Anterior Cervical CageStryker Spine · 2017 · 3 generations on129descendants
  • K180364HD LifeSciences Cervical IBFD SystemHd Lifesciences, LLC · 2018 · 4 generations on106descendants
  • K183557Endoskeleton® TA Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TAS Interbody Fusion Device…Titan Spine, Inc. · 2019 · 5 generations on104descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K090707Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceMeditech Advisors, LLC2009—
+1K150788Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices, Talos -C Cervical Intervertebral…Meditech Spine, LLC2015—
+2K160924Amendia Interbody Fusion DevicesAmendia, Inc.2016—
+3K171496Tritanium C Anterior Cervical CageStryker Spine2017—
+4K180364HD LifeSciences Cervical IBFD SystemHd Lifesciences, LLC2018—
+5K183557Endoskeleton® TA Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton® TAS Interbody Fusion…Titan Spine, Inc.20193

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201530
201640
2017150
2018140
2019210
2020230
2021180
2022280
2023380
2024390
2025410
2026360
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K090707, 2009–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (281)

See all 281

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K150788Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices, Talos -C Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion…Meditech Spine, LLC2015202
K102957Cutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion DeviceCutting Edge Spine, LLC201193
K170297Tranquil Interbody SystemNexus Spine, LLC201715
K170395Talos® Lumbar (HA) PEEK IBF DevicesMeditech Spine, LLC201710
K143572Intersomatic Cervical Device - DICOM PEEK, Intersomatic Intervertebral Space Maintenance…Osteomed Implantes, Ltda20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K150788 (Meditech Spine, LLC, 2015) has gone furthest, with 202 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The TalosTM IBF Device is an intervertebral body device intended for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. TalosTM IBF devices are intended to be used with autologous bone graft to…

Read the full statement (148 words)

The TalosTM IBF Device is an intervertebral body device intended for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. TalosTM IBF devices are intended to be used with autologous bone graft to facilitate fusion. The TalosTM IBF device is to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.

Talos TM IBF devices are to be implanted via a direct posterior, transforaminal, lateral or anterior approach. The TalosTM-P device is implanted in pairs, and the TalosTM-A, TalosTM-L and TalosTM-T devices may be implanted singly or in pairs in the lumbosacral spine. The TalosTM-A, TalosTM-L, TalosTM-P, and TalosTM-T are intended to be used with supplemental fixation.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K090707: Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090707

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026