510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion Device
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Cutting Edge Spine, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Apr 28, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K090707 (Meditech Advisors, LLC, 2009) and 3 other predicates after a 205-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996. 93 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Apr 28, 2011
- Review
- 205 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to P950002 (1996). 4 ancestors in all. 93 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
- This deviceK102957 Cutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion DeviceCutting Edge Spine, LLC · 2011
- Descendant · cites it directly · 92 of its ownK150321 EVOS Lumbar Interbody SystemCutting Edge Spine, LLC · 2015
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 50 of its ownK153615 NeoFuse HA Enhanced PLIF/TLIFHt Medical, LLC · 2016
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 49 of its ownK170318 NeoFuse Ti3D PLIF/TLIF/Cervical InterbodyHt Medical, LLC · 2017
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 37 of its ownK192115 SABLE Expandable SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2020
- Descendant · 5 generations on · 23 of its ownK222270 HEDRON Cervical Spacers, HEDRON Lumbar Spacers, SABLE Expandable…Globus Medical, Inc. · 2022
Showing 5 of 93 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 93 · See all- K150321EVOS Lumbar Interbody SystemCutting Edge Spine, LLC · 2015 · cites it directly92descendants
- K153615NeoFuse HA Enhanced PLIF/TLIFHt Medical, LLC · 2016 · 2 generations on50descendants
- K170318NeoFuse Ti3D PLIF/TLIF/Cervical InterbodyHt Medical, LLC · 2017 · 3 generations on49descendants
- K192115SABLE Expandable SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2020 · 4 generations on37descendants
- K222270HEDRON Cervical Spacers, HEDRON Lumbar Spacers, SABLE Expandable Spacer, ExcelsiusGPS…Globus Medical, Inc. · 2022 · 5 generations on23descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion System | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K102957 | Cutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion Device | Cutting Edge Spine, LLC | 2011 | — |
| +1 | K150321 | EVOS Lumbar Interbody System | Cutting Edge Spine, LLC | 2015 | — |
| +2 | K153615 | NeoFuse HA Enhanced PLIF/TLIF | Ht Medical, LLC | 2016 | — |
| +3 | K170318 | NeoFuse Ti3D PLIF/TLIF/Cervical Interbody | Ht Medical, LLC | 2017 | — |
| +4 | K192115 | SABLE Expandable Spacer | Globus Medical, Inc. | 2020 | — |
| +5 | K222270 | HEDRON Cervical Spacers, HEDRON Lumbar Spacers, SABLE Expandable Spacer… | Globus Medical, Inc. | 2022 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8 | 0 |
| 2021 | 5 | 0 |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 |
| 2023 | 14 | 0 |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 |
| 2025 | 15 | 0 |
| 2026 | 14 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K090707 | Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceSummary page 2…Device (CES) is substantially equivalent to the following device: 510(k) Number Device Manufacturer K(090707 Tabos Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Meditech Advisors, LLC P960025 (PMA) Lumbar I/F Cage®… | 2009 |
| * | P960025 | Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle ScrewsSummary page 2…Device Manufacturer K(090707 Tabos Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Meditech Advisors, LLC P960025 (PMA) Lumbar I/F Cage® System DePuy Spine P950002 (PMA) BAK® Interbody Fusio… | 1999 |
| * | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 2…Tabos Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Meditech Advisors, LLC P960025 (PMA) Lumbar I/F Cage® System DePuy Spine P950002 (PMA) BAK® Interbody Fusion System Zimmer K071724 Lucent device… | 1996 |
| * | K071724 | LucentSummary page 2…) Lumbar I/F Cage® System DePuy Spine P950002 (PMA) BAK® Interbody Fusion System Zimmer K071724 Lucent device Spinal Elements 4. Description of the Device The CES device… | 2007 |
What descends from it? (93)
See all 935 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Cutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion Device (CES) is an intervertebral body device intended for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels from L-2-S1. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The CES device is intended to be used with…
Read the full statement (144 words)
The Cutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion Device (CES) is an intervertebral body device intended for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels from L-2-S1. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies.
The CES device is intended to be used with autologous bone graft to facilitate fusion. It is to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment and is to be implanted via a direct posterior, transforaminal, retroperitoneal or anterior approach. The CES-PLIF and CES-LIF are implanted in pairs, while the CES-TLIF, CES-CLIF and CES-RLIF devices may be implanted singly or in pairs in the lumbosacral spine. The CES device is intended to be used with supplemental fixation.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K102957 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K102957: Cutting Edge Spine Interbody Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102957
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026