510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Computed Tomography X-Ray System, Model Picasso-Duo

K090991510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 9, 2009185-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

E-Woo Technology · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Oct 9, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K082350 (VATECH Co., Ltd., 2008) and 1 other predicate after a 185-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1997. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Oct 9, 2009
Review
185 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K973642 (1997). 4 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant clearedK973642 · Orthopantomograph OP100 and Orthoceph OC100 · Instrumentarium Imaging, Inc. · 1997K063773 · Volumetric Tomography · Instrumentarium Dental, Inc. · 2007K082350 · PAX-500 · VATECH Co., Ltd. · 20081995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant K082350 · PAX-500 · VATECH Co., Ltd. · 2008K063773 · Volumetric Tomography · Instrumentarium Dental, Inc. · 2007K973642 · Orthopantomograph OP100 and Orthoceph OC100 · Instrumentarium Imaging, Inc. · 19970
  1. Root · 3 generations backK973642 Orthopantomograph OP100 and Orthoceph OC100Instrumentarium Imaging, Inc. · 1997
  2. 2 generations backK063773 Volumetric TomographyInstrumentarium Dental, Inc. · 2007
  3. 1 generation backK082350 PAX-500VATECH Co., Ltd. · 2008
  4. This deviceK090991 Computed Tomography X-Ray System, Model Picasso-DuoE-Woo Technology · 2009
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK102196 Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemVATECH Co., Ltd. · 2011
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK132983 Ton-95LH, Pax-I3D OrthoVATECH Co., Ltd. · 2014
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK160882 PaX-i3D Green Premium (Model: PCT-90LH)VATECH Co., Ltd. · 2016

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K102196Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemVATECH Co., Ltd. · 2011 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K132983Ton-95LH, Pax-I3D OrthoVATECH Co., Ltd. · 2014 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K160882PaX-i3D Green Premium (Model: PCT-90LH)VATECH Co., Ltd. · 2016 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K973642Orthopantomograph OP100 and Orthoceph OC100Instrumentarium Imaging, Inc.1997—
−2K063773Volumetric TomographyInstrumentarium Dental, Inc.2007—
−1K082350PAX-500VATECH Co., Ltd.2008—
0 (this device)K090991Computed Tomography X-Ray System, Model Picasso-DuoE-Woo Technology2009—
+1K102196Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemVATECH Co., Ltd.2011—
+2K132983Ton-95LH, Pax-I3D OrthoVATECH Co., Ltd.2014—
+3K160882PaX-i3D Green Premium (Model: PCT-90LH)VATECH Co., Ltd.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201410
201610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K090991, 1997–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K082350PAX-500
Summary page 1
…redicate Device A: Manufacturer · VATECH Co., Ltd. Device · PaX-500 510(k) Number · K082350 (Decision Date - Oct. 10. 2008) Predicate Device B: Manufacturer · E-WOO Technology Co., Ltd.…
VATECH Co., Ltd.2008—
*K070658Dental Digital Panoramic/3D Imaging System
Summary page 1
…anufacturer · E-WOO Technology Co., Ltd. Device · EPX-Impla: Picasso-Trio 510(k) Number · K070658 (Decision Date - Apr. 5. 2007) E-WOO Technology Co., Ltd. 510(k) Submission - Picasso-Duo 4. Classificatio…
E-Woo Technology2007—

Also cleared against K082350: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102196Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemVATECH Co., Ltd.20112

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K102196 (VATECH Co., Ltd., 2011) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K082350.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

The Picasso-Duo is a computed tomography x-ray system which is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images(optionally with panoramic) for dental examination and diagnosis of diseases of the teeth, jaw and oral structure by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K090991: Computed Tomography X-Ray System, Model Picasso-Duo.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090991

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026