510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Conmed Aer Defense Smoke Evacuator

K091139510(k) TraditionalCleared May 5, 200915-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.5070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Conmed Corporation · FYD Apparatus, Exhaust, Surgical

Cleared on May 5, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K924732 (Buffalo Filter Co., Inc., 1993) and 1 other predicate after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1993. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 5, 2009
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FYD
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K924732 (1993). 3 ancestors in all. 5 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2024: 2 descendants clearedK924732 · Porta Plumesafe (TM) 601 Smoke Evacuation System · Buffalo Filter Co., Inc. · 1993K053464 · Service Manager SM40SE · Conmed Integrated Systems, Canada, Ulc · 20061990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 4 descendants K053464 · Service Manager SM40SE · Conmed Integrated Systems, Canada, Ulc · 2006K924732 · Porta Plumesafe (TM) 601 Smoke Evacuation System · Buffalo Filter Co., Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 2 generations backK924732 Porta Plumesafe (TM) 601 Smoke Evacuation SystemBuffalo Filter Co., Inc. · 1993
  2. 1 generation backK053464 Service Manager SM40SEConmed Integrated Systems, Canada, Ulc · 2006
  3. This deviceK091139 Conmed Aer Defense Smoke EvacuatorConmed Corporation · 2009
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK131402 Visiclear Smoke Evacuation SystemBuffalo Filter Co., Inc. · 2014
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK240127 PlumeSafe X5 Smoke Management SystemConmed Corporation · 2024
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK233789 8Q10 Surclear Smoke Plume Evacuation SystemSurnic Corporation · 2024
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK182224 SafeAir Smoke Evacuator compactLina Medical Aps · 2019
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK142335 RapidVac Smoke Evacuator SystemCovidien · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K131402Visiclear Smoke Evacuation SystemBuffalo Filter Co., Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K240127PlumeSafe X5 Smoke Management SystemConmed Corporation · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K2337898Q10 Surclear Smoke Plume Evacuation SystemSurnic Corporation · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K182224SafeAir Smoke Evacuator compactLina Medical Aps · 2019 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K142335RapidVac Smoke Evacuator SystemCovidien · 2015 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K924732Porta Plumesafe (TM) 601 Smoke Evacuation SystemBuffalo Filter Co., Inc.1993—
−1K053464Service Manager SM40SEConmed Integrated Systems, Canada, Ulc2006—
0 (this device)K091139Conmed Aer Defense Smoke EvacuatorConmed Corporation2009—
+1K131402Visiclear Smoke Evacuation SystemBuffalo Filter Co., Inc.2014—
+2K240127PlumeSafe X5 Smoke Management SystemConmed Corporation2024—
+2K2337898Q10 Surclear Smoke Plume Evacuation SystemSurnic Corporation2024—
+2K182224SafeAir Smoke Evacuator compactLina Medical Aps2019—
+2K142335RapidVac Smoke Evacuator SystemCovidien2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
201510
201910
202420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091139, 1993–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FYD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FYD device

  1. #1 K240127 PlumeSafe X5 Smoke Management Systemscore 8.7 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K924732Porta Plumesafe (TM) 601 Smoke Evacuation System
Summary page 1
…FYD Predicate Device: This product is similar in design, composition, and function to the Porta PlumesaferM 601 Smoke Evacuation System, K924732 and the Smoke Evacuation section of the ConMed Integrated Service Manager SM40SE, K…
Buffalo Filter Co., Inc.1993—
*K053464Service Manager SM40SE
Summary page 1
…ferM 601 Smoke Evacuation System, K924732 and the Smoke Evacuation section of the ConMed Integrated Service Manager SM40SE, K053464. Technological Characteristics Smoke Evacuator: The CONMED Aer DefenseTM Smoke Evacuator has been designed with a high suction…
Conmed Integrated Systems, Canada, Ulc2006—

Also cleared against K924732: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (5)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K131402Visiclear Smoke Evacuation SystemBuffalo Filter Co., Inc.20144

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 12.7 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K131402 (Buffalo Filter Co., Inc., 2014) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K924732.

How does its category compare?

All FYD devices

FYD Apparatus, Exhaust, Surgical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FYD

2in 2024

2009: 12014: 12015: 12017: 12018: 12019: 32020: 12021: 12022: 12024: 2
2007high 3 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FYD

71in 2019

2019: 71 days median
2007high 71 (2019)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FYD

3so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2010: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 3 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FYD

15in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 52010: 392011: 1502012: 1202013: 1422014: 712015: 212016: 22017: 32018: 52019: 112020: 112021: 202022: 462023: 192024: 112025: 15
2007high 150 (2011) · low 2 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FYD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—03
20080—04
20091—05
20100—139
20110—0150
20120—0120
20130—0142
20141—071
20151—021
20160—02
20171—03
20181—05
2019371011
20201—011
20211—020
20221—046
20230—019
20242—011
20250—015
20260—3—

What is it indicated for?

The CONMED Aer Defense Smoke Evacuator is designed to remove smoke, aerosols and mitigate odors produced by surgical smoke during electrosurgical procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091139: Conmed Aer Defense Smoke Evacuator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091139

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026