510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2016

IN Vision-Plus Nano with Neutral Advantage Technology

K093489510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 29, 2010261-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5440Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Rymed Technologies, Inc. · FPA Set, Administration, Intravascular

Cleared on Jul 29, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K991653 (Rymed Technologies, Inc., 1999) and 3 other predicates after a 261-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1995. 1 of the 17 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jul 29, 2010
Review
261 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FPA
Recalls
1
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K942988 (1995). 16 ancestors in all, the oldest K915571 (1992). No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 17 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor2008: 1 other ancestor2000: 2 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall12007: 1 other ancestor2006: 1 other ancestor1998: 2 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestorK942988 · Filtered Extension Sets · B. Braun of America, Inc. · 1995 · recalledK955585 · V2 Injection Site · B.Braun Medical, Inc. · 1996 · recalledK973167 · Positive Pressure Connector · Icu Medical, Inc. · 1997K991653 · Invision-Plus Injection Port Connector System · Rymed Technologies, Inc. · 1999 · recalled19901995200020052010
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall12 generations back: 3 other ancestors3 generations back: 4 other ancestors4 generations back: 2 other ancestors K991653 · Invision-Plus Injection Port Connector System · Rymed Technologies, Inc. · 1999 · recalledK973167 · Positive Pressure Connector · Icu Medical, Inc. · 1997K955585 · V2 Injection Site · B.Braun Medical, Inc. · 1996 · recalledK942988 · Filtered Extension Sets · B. Braun of America, Inc. · 1995 · recalled0
  1. Root · 4 generations backK942988 Filtered Extension SetsB. Braun of America, Inc. · 1995 · Recalled
  2. 3 generations backK955585 V2 Injection SiteB.Braun Medical, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  3. 2 generations backK973167 Positive Pressure ConnectorIcu Medical, Inc. · 1997
  4. 1 generation backK991653 Invision-Plus Injection Port Connector SystemRymed Technologies, Inc. · 1999 · Recalled
  5. This deviceK093489 IN Vision-Plus Nano with Neutral Advantage TechnologyRymed Technologies, Inc. · 2010

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K942988Filtered Extension SetsB. Braun of America, Inc.199532
−3K955585V2 Injection SiteB.Braun Medical, Inc.199627
−2K973167Positive Pressure ConnectorIcu Medical, Inc.1997—
−1K991653Invision-Plus Injection Port Connector SystemRymed Technologies, Inc.19994
0 (this device)K093489IN Vision-Plus Nano with Neutral Advantage TechnologyRymed Technologies, Inc.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199210
199510
199610
199710
199820
200021
200610
200710
200810
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K093489, 1995–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FPA device

  1. #1 K243841 Sparta Infusion Set for Insulinscore 13.4 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K991653Invision-Plus Injection Port Connector System
Summary page 1
…Predicate Device [21 CFR 8D7.92(a)(3)J The following predicate devices have been identified: RyMed Technologies InVision-PluSTM1 Injection Ports - K991 653 The subject device issimilar to the RyMed Technologies lnViSionl-PIUSTM Injection Ports with regard to le…
Rymed Technologies, Inc.19994
*K081289V-Link Antimicrobial Luer Activated Device and Extension Sets with V-Link Antimicrobial…
Summary page 1
…between the subject device and the untreated predicate device are outlined in Appendix 1. *Baxter V-Link Antimicrobial Luer Activated Device - K081289 The subject device is similar to the Baxter V-Link Antimicrobial Luer Activated Device except the subject…
Baxter Healthcare Corp2008—
*K993691Arrowg +Ard Blue Plus Antimicrobial Multi-Lumen Central Venous Catheter
Summary page 3
…predicate device is that the septum is treated with silver and chlorhexidine, and the fluid path is treated with silver. The predicate devices cleared under K08 1289 and K993691 contain silver and silver/chiorliexidine, respectively. The predicate device cleared under K090 134 is rated for use with low pre…
Arrow Intl., Inc.2000Class I
*K090134Intravenous Power Injector Extension Set
Summary page 3
…treated with silver. The predicate devices cleared under K08 1289 and K993691 contain silver and silver/chiorliexidine, respectively. The predicate device cleared under K090 134 is rated for use with low pressure power injectors having a maximum pressure of 325 psi and a maximum flow rate of 10 mL/sec. Pe…
C.R. Bard, Inc.2009—

Also cleared against K991653: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 5, 2016Class IIZ-0676-2016Process designPotential for the female luer component of the InVision-Plus IV connector to crack during use.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K993691Arrowg +Ard Blue Plus Antimicrobial Multi-Lumen Central Venous CatheterArrow Intl., Inc. · 2000 · Direct predicate · ◆ in the 2000 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.6 years on median.
  • 11 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K991653.

How does its category compare?

All FPA devices

FPA Set, Administration, Intravascular: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FPA

11in 2025

2007: 162008: 182009: 102010: 232011: 122012: 212013: 132014: 222015: 172016: 122017: 172018: 42019: 72020: 102021: 132022: 142023: 142024: 72025: 112026 (partial year): 5
2007high 23 (2010) · low 4 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FPA

225in 2025

2007: 75 days median2008: 89 days median2009: 166 days median2010: 120 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 90 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 195 days median2017: 240 days median2018: 177 days median2019: 161 days median2020: 327 days median2021: 186 days median2022: 213 days median2023: 340 days median2024: 244 days median2025: 225 days median2026 (partial year): 266 days median
2007high 340 (2023) · low 75 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FPA

98in 2025

2007: 172008: 152009: 1662010: 582011: 282012: 16, 4 Class I2013: 642014: 242015: 62016: 102017: 132018: 42019: 132020: 1072021: 12022: 9, 5 Class I2023: 12, 4 Class I2024: 13, 1 Class I2025: 98, 1 Class I2026 (partial year): 10, 2 Class I
2007high 166 (2009) · low 1 (2021)2026

Class I (17 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FPA

34,506in 2025

2007: 1,4992008: 1,9412009: 2,5122010: 2,5372011: 4,4072012: 4,9302013: 4,6512014: 4,6952015: 6,6252016: 8,4702017: 6,4622018: 6,5742019: 11,2272020: 9,5632021: 10,4142022: 13,3932023: 10,9162024: 47,2102025: 34,506
2007high 47,210 (2024) · low 1,499 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FPA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071675171,499
20081889151,941
2009101661662,512
201023120582,537
20111287284,407
2012219616 (4)4,930
20131390644,651
20142289244,695
20151712366,625
201612195108,470
201717240136,462
2018417746,574
201971611311,227
2020103271079,563
202113186110,414
2022142139 (5)13,393
20231434012 (4)10,916
2024724413 (1)47,210
20251122598 (1)34,506
2026526610 (2)—

What is it indicated for?

The RyMed Technologies 1nVision-PlusOCSTN1 with Neutral AdvantageTm Technology Injection Port Systems are intended for single patient use in intravenous and blood administration sets without need for needles, thus eliminating the potential for needle-stick injuries during use. The RyMed Technologies lnVision-Plus'CSTm with Neutral Advantage Tm Technology Injection Port contains silver ions and chiorhiexidine, which are intended to inhibit the growth of…

Read the full statement (188 words)

The RyMed Technologies 1nVision-PlusOCSTN1 with Neutral AdvantageTm Technology Injection Port Systems are intended for single patient use in intravenous and blood administration sets without need for needles, thus eliminating the potential for needle-stick injuries during use.

The RyMed Technologies lnVision-Plus'CSTm with Neutral Advantage Tm Technology Injection Port contains silver ions and chiorhiexidine, which are intended to inhibit the growth of microorganisms on the treated surfaces of the device, which include the septum and the fluid path.

The RyMed Technologies InVision-Plus"' CST"' with Neutral AdvantageTM. Technology Injection Port has been shown to be effective for 7 days against the following microorganisms: Acinelobacter baimiannji, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus auretus, Staphylococcus autrevis, Eseherichija coli, Candlida albicans, Kiebsiella pnumutoniae, Pseudoinonas aerughiosa, and Staphylococcns epidermidis.

The subject device is not intended to treat existing infections. The device is not intended to have any effect on contaminated infusion solutions.

Correlation between in vitro antibacterial activity and any clinical effectiveness has not been tested.

The lnV ision-Plus®CSTMt with Neutral AdvantageTM~ Technology Injection Port Systems may be used with low pressure power injectors having a maximum pressure of 325 psi and a maximum flow rate of 10 mL/sec.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K093489: IN Vision-Plus Nano with Neutral Advantage Technology.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093489

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026