510(k) · Cleared
ClearedMdpo Frame System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Mdpo, LLC · KTT Appliance, Fixation, Nail/Blade/Plate Combination, Multiple Component
Cleared on Aug 26, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K870961 (Richards Medical Co., Inc., 1987) and 5 other predicates after a 262-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1983.
- Decided
- Aug 26, 2010
- Review
- 262 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- KTT
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 6
Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K831576 (1983). 17 ancestors in all, the oldest K801594 (1980). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 | K831576 | Orthofix | Electro-Biology, Inc. | 1983 | — |
| −2 | K955848 | Orthofix Modulsystem | Orthofix, Inc. | 1996 | 23 |
| −1 | K071395 | Biomet Vision Footring System | Biomet Manufacturing Corp | 2007 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K093753 | Mdpo Frame System | Mdpo, LLC | 2010 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 1 | 0 |
| 1986 | 1 | 0 |
| 1987 | 1 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KTT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new KTT device
- #1 K242861 TrueLok Elevatescore 21.3 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (6)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K870961 | Richards External Fixation SystemSummary page 2…K093753 Predicate Devices: The MDPO Frame System is similar to several predicates including the following: * Smith &NephewlIlizarov External Fixation System (K870961, K962808, K994143) * DePuy ACE-Fischer External Fixation System (K083789) * Biomet Vision FootRing System (K071395, K093057… | 1987 |
| * | K962808 | Ilizarov External Fixation SystemSummary page 2…93753 Predicate Devices: The MDPO Frame System is similar to several predicates including the following: * Smith &NephewlIlizarov External Fixation System (K870961, K962808, K994143) * DePuy ACE-Fischer External Fixation System (K083789) * Biomet Vision FootRing System (K071395, K093057) Techno… | 1996 |
| * | K994143 | Smith & Nephew External Fixation System [Unilateral (Linear) & Multilateral (Circular)…Summary page 2…redicate Devices: The MDPO Frame System is similar to several predicates including the following: * Smith &NephewlIlizarov External Fixation System (K870961, K962808, K994143) * DePuy ACE-Fischer External Fixation System (K083789) * Biomet Vision FootRing System (K071395, K093057) Technological C… | 2000 |
| * | K083789 | Ace Fischer External Fixation SystemSummary page 2…ral predicates including the following: * Smith &NephewlIlizarov External Fixation System (K870961, K962808, K994143) * DePuy ACE-Fischer External Fixation System (K083789) * Biomet Vision FootRing System (K071395, K093057) Technological Characteristics The MDPO Frame System was characterized and… | 2009 |
| * | K071395 | Biomet Vision Footring SystemSummary page 2…Smith &NephewlIlizarov External Fixation System (K870961, K962808, K994143) * DePuy ACE-Fischer External Fixation System (K083789) * Biomet Vision FootRing System (K071395, K093057) Technological Characteristics The MDPO Frame System was characterized and evaluated according applicable requirements… | 2007 |
| * | K093057 | Biomet Vision Footring SystemSummary page 2…phewlIlizarov External Fixation System (K870961, K962808, K994143) * DePuy ACE-Fischer External Fixation System (K083789) * Biomet Vision FootRing System (K071395, K093057) Technological Characteristics The MDPO Frame System was characterized and evaluated according applicable requirements outlined… | 2009 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 27 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 11.3 years on median.
- 4 of the 17 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 9 other devices also cite its predicate K870961.
How does its category compare?
All KTT devicesKTT Appliance, Fixation, Nail/Blade/Plate Combination, Multiple Component: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · KTT
10in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KTT
88in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KTT
2in 2021
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · KTT
673in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code KTT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 9 | 55 | 2 | 45 |
| 2008 | 11 | 73 | 1 | 66 |
| 2009 | 11 | 94 | 2 | 45 |
| 2010 | 12 | 148 | 1 | 121 |
| 2011 | 10 | 157 | 0 | 196 |
| 2012 | 9 | 140 | 4 | 527 |
| 2013 | 7 | 87 | 7 | 898 |
| 2014 | 14 | 129 | 0 | 445 |
| 2015 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 401 |
| 2016 | 10 | 142 | 0 | 400 |
| 2017 | 11 | 184 | 1 | 485 |
| 2018 | 6 | 149 | 14 | 597 |
| 2019 | 8 | 110 | 3 | 800 |
| 2020 | 9 | 200 | 0 | 942 |
| 2021 | 10 | 83 | 2 | 961 |
| 2022 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 627 |
| 2023 | 7 | 29 | 0 | 554 |
| 2024 | 5 | 90 | 0 | 523 |
| 2025 | 10 | 88 | 0 | 673 |
| 2026 | 5 | 68 | 11 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The MDPO Frame System is indicated for use in the lower extremity for: open and closed long bone fracture fixation, to include tensioned wire fixation of periarticular fractures, arthrodesis, osteotomy, reconstruction, non-unions, pseudoarthrosis, correction of bony or soft tissue defects and deformities, dislocations, arthrodiastasis, and Charcot foot reconstruction and Lisfranc dislocations.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K093753 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K093753: Mdpo Frame System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093753
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026