510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2023Impix Lumbar Interbody Device
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Medicrea Technologies · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Jul 22, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K072226 (Medicrea Technologies, 2007) and 3 other predicates after a 147-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1984. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Jul 22, 2010
- Review
- 147 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- 1
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K841189 (1984). 40 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 6 generations between
- 3 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
- 2 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
- 1 generation backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
- This deviceK100544 Impix Lumbar Interbody DeviceMedicrea Technologies · 2010
Show all 10 generations
- Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 9 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
- 8 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
- 7 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 6 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 5 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
- 4 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
- 3 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
- 2 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
- 1 generation backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
- This deviceK100544 Impix Lumbar Interbody DeviceMedicrea Technologies · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −10 | K841189 | Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator | Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. | 1984 | — |
| −9 | K990148 | Stackable Cage System | Depuy Motech Acromed | 1999 | — |
| −8 | K003043 | Surgical Titanium Mesh System | Depuyacromed | 2001 | — |
| −7 | K022793 | Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −6 | K031757 | Peek Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −5 | K041888 | Curved Peek Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medizintechnik GmbH | 2004 | — |
| −4 | K042930 | Spacevision Cage System | Spine Vision, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| −3 | K062759 | Paramount VBR System | Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. | 2007 | — |
| −2 | K072120 | Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. | 2007 | — |
| −1 | K073177 | Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device System | Pioneer Surgical Technology | 2008 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K100544 | Impix Lumbar Interbody Device | Medicrea Technologies | 2010 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 6 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 5 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K072226 | Impix SpacerSummary page 1…ntervertebral body fusion device - lumbar 3. Predicate or legally marketed devices which are substantially equivalent: • The IMPIX-L Lumbar Cages (MEDICREA, K072226) * The ORACLE Spacer (Synthes, K072797) *•TheCROSS-FUSE (Pioneer, K073177) * The Vu-a-Pod (Theken spine,… | 2007 |
| * | K072791 | Oracle Spacer, Opal Spacer Our reading of the summary gave K072797, FDA’s number for GE Logiq I Comapact Ultrasound, GE Logiq E Compact… (General Electric Co.). Corrected to the number one digit away whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “ORACLE Spacer”. | 2007 |
| * | K073177 | Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemSummary page 1…ich are substantially equivalent: • The IMPIX-L Lumbar Cages (MEDICREA, K072226) * The ORACLE Spacer (Synthes, K072797) *•TheCROSS-FUSE (Pioneer, K073177) * The Vu-a-Pod (Theken spine, K080822) 4. Description of the device: The purpose of this submission… | 2008 |
| * | K080822 | VU Apod Intervertabral Body Fusion DeviceSummary page 1…IMPIX-L Lumbar Cages (MEDICREA, K072226) * The ORACLE Spacer (Synthes, K072797) *•TheCROSS-FUSE (Pioneer, K073177) * The Vu-a-Pod (Theken spine, K080822) 4. Description of the device: The purpose of this submission is to submit the new Lumbar Interbody device: I… | 2008 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2023 | Class II | Z-2455-2023 | Under Investigation by firm | There is a potential for a product packaging non-conformity issue which presents as a pinhole in either the inner or outer pouch. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 9 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
- 9 of the 40 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 10 other devices also cite its predicate K072226.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
IMPIX DLIF Lumbar Interbody Device is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DOD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDID is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). This device is to be used with autogenous bone graft.
IMPIX DLIF Lumbar Interbody Device is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K100544 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K100544: Impix Lumbar Interbody Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100544
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026