510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Fetal Monitor Model: BT-200T

K100885510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 7, 201069-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.2740

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bistos Co., Ltd. · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal

Cleared on Jun 7, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K052190 (Bistos Co., Ltd., 2005) after a 69-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1994. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jun 7, 2010
Review
69 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HGM
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K930200 (1994). 9 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor1994: 2 other ancestors2015: 1 descendant clearedK930200 · Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex II · Huntleigh Healthcare, Inc. · 1994K991441 · Cadence Doppler Ultrasound System · Medasonics, Inc. · 1999K040480 · Sonotrax Ultrasonic Pocket Doppler · Edan Instruments, Inc. · 2004K052190 · Fetal Monitor, Models BT-300 and BT-200 · Bistos Co., Ltd. · 20051990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 4 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K052190 · Fetal Monitor, Models BT-300 and BT-200 · Bistos Co., Ltd. · 2005K040480 · Sonotrax Ultrasonic Pocket Doppler · Edan Instruments, Inc. · 2004K991441 · Cadence Doppler Ultrasound System · Medasonics, Inc. · 1999K930200 · Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex II · Huntleigh Healthcare, Inc. · 19940
  1. Root · 4 generations backK930200 Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex IIHuntleigh Healthcare, Inc. · 1994
  2. 3 generations backK991441 Cadence Doppler Ultrasound SystemMedasonics, Inc. · 1999
  3. 2 generations backK040480 Sonotrax Ultrasonic Pocket DopplerEdan Instruments, Inc. · 2004
  4. 1 generation backK052190 Fetal Monitor, Models BT-300 and BT-200Bistos Co., Ltd. · 2005
  5. This deviceK100885 Fetal Monitor Model: BT-200TBistos Co., Ltd. · 2010
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK142799 Model BT-220L and BT-220CBistos Co., Ltd. · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K142799Model BT-220L and BT-220CBistos Co., Ltd. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K930200Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex IIHuntleigh Healthcare, Inc.1994—
−3K991441Cadence Doppler Ultrasound SystemMedasonics, Inc.1999—
−2K040480Sonotrax Ultrasonic Pocket DopplerEdan Instruments, Inc.2004—
−1K052190Fetal Monitor, Models BT-300 and BT-200Bistos Co., Ltd.2005—
0 (this device)K100885Fetal Monitor Model: BT-200TBistos Co., Ltd.2010—
+1K142799Model BT-220L and BT-220CBistos Co., Ltd.2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199420
200010
200110
200310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K100885, 1994–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device

  1. #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052190Fetal Monitor, Models BT-300 and BT-200
Summary page 3
…usion Bistos' BT-200T Pocket size Petal monitor in this submission is substantially equivalent to the already cleared BT-200 under K052 190 on Oct 2005 at Design, specification, intended use, used material, direction to use, software,…
Bistos Co., Ltd.2005—

Also cleared against K052190: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K142799Model BT-220L and BT-220CBistos Co., Ltd.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.7 years on median.
  • None of the 9 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K142799 (Bistos Co., Ltd., 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K052190.

How does its category compare?

All HGM devices

HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HGM

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 132012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 32018: 32020: 12022: 12023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2011) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HGM

269in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 66 days median2010: 193 days median2011: 141 days median2012: 107 days median2014: 231 days median2015: 169 days median2017: 138 days median2018: 258 days median2025: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2025) · low 56 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HGM

5in 2019

2008: 42009: 62013: 12014: 12019: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HGM

99in 2025

2007: 352008: 172009: 422010: 642011: 832012: 442013: 162014: 302015: 442016: 172017: 272018: 302019: 412020: 192021: 712022: 872023: 692024: 1742025: 99
2007high 174 (2024) · low 16 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007356035
2008475417
2009466642
20104193064
201113141083
20124107044
20132—116
20144231130
20155169044
20161—017
20173138027
20183258030
20190—541
20201—019
20210—071
20221—087
20232—069
20241—0174
20254269099
20262—2—

What is it indicated for?

The BT-200T is a Fetal Monitor for measuring Fetal Heart Rate, Data is displayed on a front panel LCD display, Fetal heart may be measured by means of Doppler ultrasound.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K100885: Fetal Monitor Model: BT-200T.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100885

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026