510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000

K101273510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 30, 2011512-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Contec Medical System Co., Ltd. · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Sep 30, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K051730 (Global Instrumentation, LLC, 2005) after a 512-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1991. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Sep 30, 2011
Review
512 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K911097 (1991). 5 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 descendant clearedK911097 · PR4 · Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 1991K021373 · H12+Holter Recorder · Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 2002K051730 · Matrix Holter System, Model M12 · Global Instrumentation, LLC · 20051990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K051730 · Matrix Holter System, Model M12 · Global Instrumentation, LLC · 2005K021373 · H12+Holter Recorder · Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 2002K911097 · PR4 · Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 19910
  1. Root · 3 generations backK911097 PR4Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 1991
  2. 2 generations backK021373 H12+Holter RecorderMortara Instrument, Inc. · 2002
  3. 1 generation backK051730 Matrix Holter System, Model M12Global Instrumentation, LLC · 2005
  4. This deviceK101273 Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000Contec Medical System Co., Ltd. · 2011
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK131897 CV3000 Holter Analysis SystemVales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd. · 2013

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K131897CV3000 Holter Analysis SystemVales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd. · 2013 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K911097PR4Mortara Instrument, Inc.1991—
−2K021373H12+Holter RecorderMortara Instrument, Inc.2002—
−1K051730Matrix Holter System, Model M12Global Instrumentation, LLC2005—
0 (this device)K101273Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000Contec Medical System Co., Ltd.2011—
+1K131897CV3000 Holter Analysis SystemVales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K101273, 1991–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051730Matrix Holter System, Model M12
Summary page 1
…re, safety and effectiveness were demonstrated substantially equivalent (SE) to the predicate device. Predicate Device Matrix Holler System, K05 1730 SE Conclusion The proposed device, Dynamic ECG System, TLC5000 is substantially equivalent (SE) to the predicate…
Global Instrumentation, LLC2005—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K131897CV3000 Holter Analysis SystemVales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd.20130

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.0 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K131897 (Vales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd., 2013) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Dynamic ECG System, TLC5000, is intended to continuously acquire ambulatory ECG data for up to twelve leads. It can record the ECG data for at most twenty four hours. The ECG data obtained will be stored in the recorder first and then download to PC for analysis, reviewing and printing by a trained physician in health facilities.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K101273: Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K101273

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026