510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CV3000 Holter Analysis System

K131897510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 26, 2013154-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd. · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Nov 26, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K101273 (Contec Medical System Co., Ltd., 2011) after a 154-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1991.

Decided
Nov 26, 2013
Review
154 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K911097 (1991). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK911097 PR4Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 1991
  2. 3 generations backK021373 H12+Holter RecorderMortara Instrument, Inc. · 2002
  3. 2 generations backK051730 Matrix Holter System, Model M12Global Instrumentation, LLC · 2005
  4. 1 generation backK101273 Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000Contec Medical System Co., Ltd. · 2011
  5. This deviceK131897 CV3000 Holter Analysis SystemVales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd. · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K911097PR4Mortara Instrument, Inc.1991—
−3K021373H12+Holter RecorderMortara Instrument, Inc.2002—
−2K051730Matrix Holter System, Model M12Global Instrumentation, LLC2005—
−1K101273Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000Contec Medical System Co., Ltd.2011—
0 (this device)K131897CV3000 Holter Analysis SystemVales & Hills Biomedical Tech., Ltd.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K131897, 1991–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K101273Dynamic Ecg System Model TLC5000
Summary page 2
…rst and then download to PC for analysis, reviewing and printing by a trained physician in health facilities. 5. Predicate Device Identification 510(k) Number: K 10 1273 Product Name: Dynamic ECG Systems, TLC5000 Manufacturer: CONTEC Medical System Co., Ltd 6. Device Description The C…
Contec Medical System Co., Ltd.2011—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.0 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The proposed device is intended to continuously acquire ambulatory ECG data for up to twelve leads or five leads. It can record the ECG data for twenty four hours. The ECG data obtained will be stored in the recorder first and then download to PC for analysis, reviewing and printing by a trained physician in health facilities.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K131897: CV3000 Holter Analysis System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K131897

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026