510(k) Report

510(k) · Decided

Recalled · Class II · 2024

Duraflow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure Kit

K110936510(k) TraditionalDecided Jun 10, 201167-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5540Recalls 6

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

AngioDynamics, Inc. · MSD Catheter, Hemodialysis, Implanted

Cleared on Jun 10, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K101843 (AngioDynamics, Inc., 2010) after a 67-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1998. 1 of the 17 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. It has been recalled 6 times.

Decided
Jun 10, 2011
Review
67 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MSD
Recalls
6
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K981994 (1998). 16 ancestors in all, the oldest K972207 (1998). No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 17 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 8 generations backK981994 Vascath Opti-Flow Long Term Dual Lumen Hemodialysis CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc. · 1998
  2. 7 generations backK012562 Medcomp 14.5F Double Lumen Hemodialysis CatheterMedical Components, Inc. · 2002
  3. 6 generations backK020465 Medcomp Ash Split-Cath IIMedcomp · 2002
  4. 5 generations backK022678 Medcomp SC4Medcomp · 2003
  5. 4 generations backK040318 Medcomp Split-Cath IIMedcomp · 2005
  6. 3 generations backK070572 Ash Advance Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure Kit, Models; 15FR X…Ash Access Technology, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  7. 2 generations backK080400 Angiodynamics, Inc., Duramax Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
  8. 1 generation backK101843 Duramax Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled (Class I)
  9. This deviceK110936 Duraflow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc. · 2011

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K981994Vascath Opti-Flow Long Term Dual Lumen Hemodialysis CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc.1998—
−7K012562Medcomp 14.5F Double Lumen Hemodialysis CatheterMedical Components, Inc.2002—
−6K020465Medcomp Ash Split-Cath IIMedcomp2002—
−5K022678Medcomp SC4Medcomp2003—
−4K040318Medcomp Split-Cath IIMedcomp2005—
−3K070572Ash Advance Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure Kit, Models; 15FR X 24CM, 15FR…Ash Access Technology, Inc.20073
−2K080400Angiodynamics, Inc., Duramax Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc.20085
−1K101843Duramax Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc.2010Class I
0 (this device)K110936Duraflow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc.2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199820
200130
200310
200420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K110936, 1998–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MSD device

  1. #1 K241581 Hemodialysis Catheterscore 12.3 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K101843Duramax Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure Kit
Summary page 1
…ing device: Device Namie -- I Manufacturer 510(k) No. Angil~ynamnics DuraMaxV Catheter and AngloDynamic K 101843, cleared Procedure Kit 1sT…
AngioDynamics, Inc.2010Class I

Also cleared against K101843: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 18, 2024Class IIZ-1762-2024Under Investigation by firmTri-Ball Tunneler may contain loosely affixed metal shavings, potential for the metal shaving to embolize, possibly requiring removal via surgical procedure.
Mar 18, 2024Class IIZ-1765-2024Under Investigation by firmTri-Ball Tunneler may contain loosely affixed metal shavings, potential for the metal shaving to embolize, possibly requiring removal via surgical procedure.
Mar 18, 2024Class IIZ-1761-2024Under Investigation by firmTri-Ball Tunneler may contain loosely affixed metal shavings, potential for the metal shaving to embolize, possibly requiring removal via surgical procedure.
Mar 18, 2024Class IIZ-1763-2024Under Investigation by firmTri-Ball Tunneler may contain loosely affixed metal shavings, potential for the metal shaving to embolize, possibly requiring removal via surgical procedure.
Mar 18, 2024Class IIZ-1760-2024Under Investigation by firmTri-Ball Tunneler may contain loosely affixed metal shavings, potential for the metal shaving to embolize, possibly requiring removal via surgical procedure.
Mar 18, 2024Class IIZ-1764-2024Under Investigation by firmTri-Ball Tunneler may contain loosely affixed metal shavings, potential for the metal shaving to embolize, possibly requiring removal via surgical procedure.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K101843Duramax Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure KitAngioDynamics, Inc. · 2010 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 6 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K101843.

How does its category compare?

All MSD devices

MSD Catheter, Hemodialysis, Implanted: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MSD

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 32009: 62010: 42011: 72012: 22013: 52014: 82015: 12016: 22017: 22018: 22019: 12020: 42021: 42025: 1
2007high 8 (2014) · low 0 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MSD

153in 2021

2007: 92 days median2008: 89 days median2009: 81 days median2010: 116 days median2011: 70 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 246 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 153 days median
2007high 246 (2014) · low 70 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MSD

1in 2013

2008: 472009: 492010: 112011: 242013: 12026 (partial year): 4, 4 Class I
2007high 49 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (4 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MSD

1,054in 2025

2007: 1182008: 1742009: 1732010: 3062011: 2682012: 3672013: 3632014: 5062015: 5502016: 5322017: 4842018: 4632019: 6452020: 4012021: 5232022: 6102023: 5422024: 8412025: 1,054
2007high 1,054 (2025) · low 118 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MSD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077920118
200838947174
200968149173
2010411611306
201177024268
20122—0367
201351051363
201482460506
20151—0550
20162—0532
20172—0484
20182—0463
20191—0645
202041060401
202141530523
20220—0610
20230—0542
20240—0841
20251—01,054
20260—4 (4)—

What is it indicated for?

The DuraFlow™ 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure Kit is indicated for use in attaining long-term vascular access for hemodialysis and apheresis.

It may be inserted percutaneously and is primarily placed in the internal jugular vein of an adult patient.

Alternative insertion sites include the subclavian vein as required.

Catheters greater than 40 cm are intended for femoral vein insertion.

This catheter is indicated for > 30 days long-term placement.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K110936: Duraflow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter and Procedure Kit.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K110936

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026