510(k) · Cleared
ClearedSMR Resurfacing Shoulder System- Humeral Heads, Cta Humeral Heads
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Lima Corporate S.P.A. · HSD Prosthesis, Shoulder, Hemi-, Humeral, Metallic Uncemented
Cleared on Jun 1, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K010657 (Biomet Manufacturing, Inc., 2001) and 5 other predicates after a 242-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1980.
- Decided
- Jun 1, 2012
- Review
- 242 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HSD
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 6
Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K800494 (1980). 29 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 7 generations backK800494 New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder ProsDepuy, Inc. · 1980
- 6 generations backK991585 Bipolar Shoulder ProsthesisBiomet, Inc. · 1999
- 5 generations backK002998 Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
- 4 generations backK010827 Copeland MB/HA Resurfacing Humeral HeadsBiomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
- 3 generations backK031971 Global Cap Resurfacing Replacement ShoulderDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2003
- 2 generations backK051843 Copeland Eas Humeral Resurfacing HeadsBiomet, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK080990 Depuy Global C.AP. Cta Resurfacing ShoulderDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2008
- This deviceK112900 SMR Resurfacing Shoulder System- Humeral Heads, Cta Humeral HeadsLima Corporate S.P.A. · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −7 | K800494 | New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder Pros | Depuy, Inc. | 1980 | — |
| −6 | K991585 | Bipolar Shoulder Prosthesis | Biomet, Inc. | 1999 | — |
| −5 | K002998 | Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder System | Biomet, Inc. | 2000 | 1 |
| −4 | K010827 | Copeland MB/HA Resurfacing Humeral Heads | Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. | 2001 | 1 |
| −3 | K031971 | Global Cap Resurfacing Replacement Shoulder | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| −2 | K051843 | Copeland Eas Humeral Resurfacing Heads | Biomet, Inc. | 2005 | 1 |
| −1 | K080990 | Depuy Global C.AP. Cta Resurfacing Shoulder | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2008 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K112900 | SMR Resurfacing Shoulder System- Humeral Heads, Cta Humeral Heads | Lima Corporate S.P.A. | 2012 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 1 | 0 |
| 1987 | 1 | 0 |
| 1991 | 3 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 4 | 0 |
| 2000 | 2 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HSD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new HSD device
- #1 K191433 AGILON® XO Shoulder Replacement Systemscore 13.8 · 16 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (6)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K010657 | Copeland MB Resurfacing Humeral HeadsSummary page 2…. The glenoid components, used in total shoulder replacement, are intended for cemented use only. Predicate Devices: " Copeland MB Resurfacing Humneral Heads (Biomet, K0 10657); * Copeland LAS Humeral Resurfacing Heads (Biomet, KO051843); * Global CAP Resurfacing Replacement Shoulder(DePuy Orthopaedics,… | 2001 |
| * | K051843 | Copeland Eas Humeral Resurfacing HeadsSummary page 2…re intended for cemented use only. Predicate Devices: " Copeland MB Resurfacing Humneral Heads (Biomet, K0 10657); * Copeland LAS Humeral Resurfacing Heads (Biomet, KO051843); * Global CAP Resurfacing Replacement Shoulder(DePuy Orthopaedics, K03 1971); * Global CAP CTA Resurfacing Shoulder (DePuy Ortho… | 2005 |
| * | K031971 | Global Cap Resurfacing Replacement ShoulderSummary page 2…rfacing Humneral Heads (Biomet, K0 10657); * Copeland LAS Humeral Resurfacing Heads (Biomet, KO051843); * Global CAP Resurfacing Replacement Shoulder(DePuy Orthopaedics, K03 1971); * Global CAP CTA Resurfacing Shoulder (DePuy Orthopaedics, K080990); * Bio-Modular shoulder system (Biomet, K9921 19); * DePuy… | 2003 |
| * | K080990 | Depuy Global C.AP. Cta Resurfacing ShoulderSummary page 2…rfacing Heads (Biomet, KO051843); * Global CAP Resurfacing Replacement Shoulder(DePuy Orthopaedics, K03 1971); * Global CAP CTA Resurfacing Shoulder (DePuy Orthopaedics, K080990); * Bio-Modular shoulder system (Biomet, K9921 19); * DePuy Global Shoulder Glenoid (DePuy K98 1487). Comn~arable Features to P… | 2008 |
| * | K992119 | Bio-Modular Shoulder SystemSummary page 2…surfacing Replacement Shoulder(DePuy Orthopaedics, K03 1971); * Global CAP CTA Resurfacing Shoulder (DePuy Orthopaedics, K080990); * Bio-Modular shoulder system (Biomet, K9921 19); * DePuy Global Shoulder Glenoid (DePuy K98 1487). Comn~arable Features to Predicate Devices: The intended use and indication… | 1999 |
| * | K981487 | Depuy Global Shoulder GlenoidSummary page 2…K03 1971); * Global CAP CTA Resurfacing Shoulder (DePuy Orthopaedics, K080990); * Bio-Modular shoulder system (Biomet, K9921 19); * DePuy Global Shoulder Glenoid (DePuy K98 1487). Comn~arable Features to Predicate Devices: The intended use and indications for the Limacorporate SMR Resurfacing Shoulder S… | 1998 |
| † | K100858 | Lima-Lio SMR Shoulder System - Humeral Stems, Lima-Lio SMR Shoulder System - Humeral… | 2010 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.0 years on median.
- 6 of the 29 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 4 other devices also cite its predicate K010657.
How does its category compare?
All HSD devicesHSD Prosthesis, Shoulder, Hemi-, Humeral, Metallic Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · HSD
1in 2024
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HSD
145in 2016
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · HSD
1in 2020
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HSD
757in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HSD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 4 | 72 | 0 | 128 |
| 2008 | 3 | 92 | 2 | 259 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 2 | 156 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 225 |
| 2011 | 2 | — | 0 | 241 |
| 2012 | 2 | — | 0 | 254 |
| 2013 | 4 | 218 | 0 | 288 |
| 2014 | 1 | — | 0 | 434 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 574 |
| 2016 | 3 | 145 | 0 | 784 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 3 | 985 |
| 2018 | 1 | — | 1 | 649 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 830 |
| 2020 | 2 | — | 1 | 658 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 573 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 508 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 586 |
| 2024 | 1 | — | 0 | 693 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 757 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The SMR Resurfacing Shoulder Prosthesis system is indicated for partial or total primary shoulder replacement in patients where the humeral head and neck have sufficient bone stock to support the prosthesis. The Standard Resurfacing heads are indicated for partial or total shoulder replacement when the rotator cuff is intact or reconstructable. Specific indications include: * non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and…
Read the full statement (120 words)
The SMR Resurfacing Shoulder Prosthesis system is indicated for partial or total primary shoulder replacement in patients where the humeral head and neck have sufficient bone stock to support the prosthesis.
The Standard Resurfacing heads are indicated for partial or total shoulder replacement when the rotator cuff is intact or reconstructable. Specific indications include:
* non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
* Post-traumatic osteoarthritis;
* Rheumatoid arthritis.
The CTA Resurfacing Heads are indicated for partial shoulder replacement in patients with rotator cuff tears and arthritis. Specific indications include:
*Rotator cuff tear arthropathy.
The humeral heads and stems are intended for uncemented use only. The glenoid components, used in total shoulder replacement, are intended for cemented use only.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K112900 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K112900: SMR Resurfacing Shoulder System- Humeral Heads, Cta Humeral Heads.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K112900
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026