510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Rampart-O, Rampart-T

K132053510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 16, 201375-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spineology, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Sep 16, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K131216 (Spineology, Inc., 2013) and 1 other predicate after a 75-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 2011. 179 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 16, 2013
Review
75 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K111880 (2011). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K110933 (2011). 179 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 other ancestor2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2017: 9 descendants cleared2020: 5 descendants cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2022: 19 descendants cleared2021: 10 descendants cleared2019: 8 descendants cleared2024: 38 descendants cleared2023: 22 descendants cleared2025: 31 descendants cleared2026: 27 descendants clearedK111880 · Spineolgy Peek Bullet Lumber Interbody Fusion Device · Spineology, Inc. · 2011×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K113030 (2012), K120293 (2012) K123652 · Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device · Spineology, Inc. · 2013K131216 · Rampart O · Spineology, Inc. · 20132010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 10 descendants3 generations forward: 11 descendants4 generations forward: 39 descendants5 generations forward: 45 descendants6 generations forward: 46 descendants7 generations forward: 19 descendants8 generations forward: 3 descendants9 generations forward: 1 descendant K131216 · Rampart O · Spineology, Inc. · 2013K123652 · Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device · Spineology, Inc. · 2013K120293 · Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion Drive · Spineology, Inc. · 2012K113030 · Spineology Peek Bullet Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device · Spineology, Inc. · 2012K111880 · Spineolgy Peek Bullet Lumber Interbody Fusion Device · Spineology, Inc. · 2011−50+5
  1. Root · 5 generations backK111880 Spineolgy Peek Bullet Lumber Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2011
  2. 4 generations backK113030 Spineology Peek Bullet Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2012
  3. 3 generations backK120293 Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DriveSpineology, Inc. · 2012
  4. 2 generations backK123652 Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2013
  5. 1 generation backK131216 Rampart OSpineology, Inc. · 2013
  6. This deviceK132053 Rampart-O, Rampart-TSpineology, Inc. · 2013
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 144 of its ownK171031 CRESCENT™ Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2017
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 97 of its ownK181357 PATRIOT® Lumbar Spacers, SUSTAIN® SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2018
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 84 of its ownK191391 HEDRON Lumbar SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2019
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 56 of its ownK210425 Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2021 · Recalled
  11. Descendant · 3 generations on · 55 of its ownK212524 Anteralign Spinal System with Titan nanoLOCK Surface TechnologyMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2021

Showing 5 of 179 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2014: 12015: 12016: 32017: 92018: 52019: 82020: 52021: 102022: 192023: 222024: 382025: 312026: 27
2014high 38 (2024) · low 1 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 179 · See all
  • K171031CRESCENT™ Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2017 · cites it directly144descendants
  • K181357PATRIOT® Lumbar Spacers, SUSTAIN® SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2018 · 2 generations on97descendants
  • K191391HEDRON Lumbar SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2019 · 3 generations on84descendants
  • K210425Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2021 · 2 generations on56descendants
  • K212524Anteralign Spinal System with Titan nanoLOCK Surface TechnologyMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2021 · 3 generations on55descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K111880Spineolgy Peek Bullet Lumber Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.2011—
−4K113030Spineology Peek Bullet Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.2012—
−3K120293Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DriveSpineology, Inc.2012—
−2K123652Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.2013—
−1K131216Rampart OSpineology, Inc.2013—
0 (this device)K132053Rampart-O, Rampart-TSpineology, Inc.2013—
+1K171031CRESCENT™ Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2017—
+2K181357PATRIOT® Lumbar Spacers, SUSTAIN® SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc.2018—
+3K191391HEDRON Lumbar SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc.2019—
+2K210425Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.20211
+3K212524Anteralign Spinal System with Titan nanoLOCK Surface TechnologyMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201210
201310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
201510
201630
201790
201850
201980
202050
2021100
2022190
2023220
2024380
2025310
2026270
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K132053, 2011–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K131216Rampart O
Summary page 1
…RampartTM-O and RampartTM-T anducCode: fcaio Class 11Medical Device, Product Code MAX. 21 CRIF 888.3080 Predicate Device(s): Ramnpar T M 0 (K 131216) and Rampat TM T (K 121129) RarnpartTM-O and Rampart Tm -T devices are designed for use with…
Spineology, Inc.2013—
*K121129Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device
Summary page 1
…and RampartTM-T anducCode: fcaio Class 11Medical Device, Product Code MAX. 21 CRIF 888.3080 Predicate Device(s): Ramnpar T M 0 (K 131216) and Rampat TM T (K 121129) RarnpartTM-O and Rampart Tm -T devices are designed for use with autograft…
Spineology, Inc.2012—

Also cleared against K131216: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (179)

See all 179

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K171031CRESCENT™ Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2017144
K153082Rampart A Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.201628
K160906Rampart O Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device, Rampart T Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device…Spineology, Inc.201627
K133371Rampart-LSpineology, Inc.20147
K151020Rampart-T Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc.20151

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 2 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 4 months on median.
  • None of the 8 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K171031 (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2017) has gone furthest, with 144 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K131216.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

Rampart 0: Rampart 0 is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for intervertebral body fusion at one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2 to SI in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally…

Read the full statement (234 words)

Rampart 0: Rampart 0 is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for intervertebral body fusion at one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2 to SI in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. Rampaa 0 is designed for use with autografi as an adjunct to fusion and is intended for use with supplemental fixation systems (e.g. pediele screws) cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.

Rampart T: Rampart T is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for intervertebral body fusion at one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2 to SI in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. Rampart T is designed for use with autograft as an adjunct to fusion and is intended for use with supplemental fixation systems (e.g. pedicle screws) cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K132053: Rampart-O, Rampart-T.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K132053

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026