510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Infill Cervical

K140066510(k) TraditionalCleared May 5, 2014115-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on May 5, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K083637 (X-Spine Systems, Inc., 2009) and 2 other predicates after a 115-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1984.

Decided
May 5, 2014
Review
115 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K841189 (1984). 20 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  4. 2 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
  5. 1 generation backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
  6. This deviceK140066 Infill CervicalPinnacle Spine Group, LLC · 2014
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 8 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 7 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 6 generations backK020522 Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2002
  5. 5 generations backK030833 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  6. 4 generations backK031635 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  7. 3 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  8. 2 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
  9. 1 generation backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
  10. This deviceK140066 Infill CervicalPinnacle Spine Group, LLC · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−8K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−7K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−6K020522Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2002—
−5K030833Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−4K031635Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−3K041722Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2004—
−2K052746Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2005—
−1K081917Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc.2009—
0 (this device)K140066Infill CervicalPinnacle Spine Group, LLC2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200010
200120
200210
200310
200820
200910
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140066, 1984–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K083637Calix Spinal Implant System
Summary page 1
…Class 11 CLASSIFICATION: REGULATION 888.3080 (product code: ODP) NUMBER PREDICATE DEVICES: Calix- Cervical Spinal Implant System (K083637, KI 12036) Bengal Cervical System (K08 1917) Substantially Equivalent To: The InFill® Cervical Inte…
X-Spine Systems, Inc.2009—
*K112036Calix PC Spinal Implant System
Summary page 2
…inal Implant System (K081917) body fusion System (K083637, devices K112036) Shape Box-shaped, bullet SAME SAME nose Bone to im…
X-Spine Systems, Inc.2011—
*K081917Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard Systems
Summary page 1
…8.3080 (product code: ODP) NUMBER PREDICATE DEVICES: Calix- Cervical Spinal Implant System (K083637, KI 12036) Bengal Cervical System (K08 1917) Substantially Equivalent To: The InFill® Cervical Interbody Fusion device are substantially equivalent in intended use, princi…
Depuy Spine, Inc.2009—

Also cleared against K083637: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 30 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • None of the 20 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K083637.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

The InFill® cervical interbody fusion device is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The InFill® cervical interbody fusion device is designed for use with autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. InFill® is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD). DDD is defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc…

Read the full statement (142 words)

The InFill® cervical interbody fusion device is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The InFill® cervical interbody fusion device is designed for use with autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. InFill® is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD). DDD is defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The devices are to be used in patients who have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level may be treated with this device. The InFill® cervical interbody fusion device is intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation systems that are cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140066: Infill Cervical.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140066

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026