510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Alamo T

K140303510(k) SpecialCleared Apr 21, 201474-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Alliance Partners, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Apr 21, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K120401 (Alliance Partners, LLC, 2012) and 3 other predicates after a 74-day review. Its family tree reaches back 12 generations to 1984.

Decided
Apr 21, 2014
Review
74 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 12 generations to K841189 (1984). 57 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 12 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 8 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  4. 2 generations backK103034 Genesys Spine Interbody Fusion SystemGenesys Spine · 2010 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK120401 Alamo TAlliance Partners, LLC · 2012
  6. This deviceK140303 Alamo TAlliance Partners, LLC · 2014
Show all 12 generations
  1. Root · 12 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 11 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 10 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 9 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 8 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 7 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
  7. 6 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  8. 5 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  9. 4 generations backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  10. 3 generations backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  11. 2 generations backK103034 Genesys Spine Interbody Fusion SystemGenesys Spine · 2010 · Recalled
  12. 1 generation backK120401 Alamo TAlliance Partners, LLC · 2012
  13. This deviceK140303 Alamo TAlliance Partners, LLC · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−12K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−11K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−10K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−9K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−8K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K033109Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X2004—
−6K043479MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA2005—
−5K080728LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2008—
−4K083857LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2009—
−3K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA2009—
−2K103034Genesys Spine Interbody Fusion SystemGenesys Spine20101
−1K120401Alamo TAlliance Partners, LLC2012—
0 (this device)K140303Alamo TAlliance Partners, LLC2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200190
200250
200320
200470
200510
200740
200880
200920
201110
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140303, 1984–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K120401Alamo T
Summary page 1
…vice Product Code: MAX (a)(3) Predicate Devices: Allliance Partners-ALAMO T (K120401) Life Spine-PLATEAU (K111569)…
Alliance Partners, LLC2012—
*K111569Plateau Spacer System
Summary page 1
…Devices: Allliance Partners-ALAMO T (K120401) Life Spine-PLATEAU (K111569) Synthes-OPAL (K072791)…
Life Spine2011—
*K072791Oracle Spacer, Opal Spacer
Summary page 1
…Life Spine-PLATEAU (K111569) Synthes-OPAL (K072791) Surgical Supplies-Biolign (K130274) (a)(4) Device Descripti…
Synthes Spine20071
*K130274Biolign Acif Systems, Biolign Stacc Acif System, Biolign Tlif System
Summary page 1
…Synthes-OPAL (K072791) Surgical Supplies-Biolign (K130274) (a)(4) Device Description: The Alamo T device is used for spinal fusion surgery to provide support and structural st…
Elite Surgical Supplies (Pty), Ltd.2013—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 30 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
  • 9 of the 57 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Alamo T device is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels of the lumbosacral spine (L2-S1). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with the degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. In addition, these patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. The device system must be used with supplemental fixation and autograft to facilitate fusion and is to be implanted via a transforaminal approach.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140303: Alamo T.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140303

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026