510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System

K091088510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 14, 200990-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ldr Spine USA · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Jul 14, 2009 as substantially equivalent to P980048 (Sulzer Spine-Tech, 2001) and 3 other predicates after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1984. 1 of the 929 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 901 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 14, 2009
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K841189 (1984). 27 ancestors in all. 901 later devices descend from it, 51 citing it directly. 1 of the 929 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2002: 4 other ancestors2001: 8 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor2004: 3 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor2013: 21 descendants cleared2014: 29 descendants cleared2011: 15 descendants cleared2019: 75 descendants cleared2017: 70 descendants cleared2010: 3 descendants cleared2020: 75 descendants cleared2016: 33 descendants cleared2012: 16 descendants cleared2018: 60 descendants cleared2015: 35 descendants cleared2023: 93 descendants cleared2024: 79 descendants cleared2021: 75 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12026: 74 descendants cleared2022: 73 descendants cleared2025: 75 descendants clearedK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K080728 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2008K083857 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 200919801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 3 other ancestors3 generations back: 4 other ancestors4 generations back: 7 other ancestors5 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 51 descendants2 generations forward: 129 descendants3 generations forward: 181 descendants4 generations forward: 196 descendants5 generations forward: 152 descendants6 generations forward: 105 descendants, 1 with a Class I recall17 generations forward: 50 descendants8 generations forward: 24 descendants9 generations forward: 11 descendants10 generations forward: 2 descendants K083857 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2009K080728 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2008K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K031757 · Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K022793 · Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984−50+5+10
  1. Root · 9 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  6. This deviceK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 454 of its ownK123206 Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion SystemMaxim Surgical · 2013
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 453 of its ownK140003 Coroent Small Interbody SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 449 of its ownK142050 Nuvasive Coroent Small Contoured Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014
  10. Descendant · 3 generations on · 444 of its ownK140921 Coroent Small Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014
  11. Descendant · 3 generations on · 441 of its ownK150362 NuVasive CoRoent Small Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 8 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 7 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 6 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 5 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 4 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
  7. 3 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  8. 2 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  9. 1 generation backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  10. This deviceK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009

Showing 5 of 901 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 32011: 152012: 162013: 212014: 292015: 352016: 332017: 702018: 602019: 752020: 752021: 752022: 732023: 932024: 792025: 752026: 74
2010high 93 (2023) · low 3 (2010)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 901 · See all
  • K123206Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion SystemMaxim Surgical · 2013 · cites it directly454descendants
  • K140003Coroent Small Interbody SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on453descendants
  • K142050Nuvasive Coroent Small Contoured Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014 · 3 generations on449descendants
  • K140921Coroent Small Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014 · 3 generations on444descendants
  • K150362NuVasive CoRoent Small Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · 3 generations on441descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−8K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−7K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−6K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−5K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−4K033109Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X2004—
−3K043479MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA2005—
−2K080728LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2008—
−1K083857LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2009—
0 (this device)K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA2009—
+1K123206Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion SystemMaxim Surgical2013—
+2K140003Coroent Small Interbody SystemNuvasive, Inc.2014—
+3K142050Nuvasive Coroent Small Contoured Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2014—
+3K140921Coroent Small Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2014—
+3K150362NuVasive CoRoent Small Interbody SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200180
200240
200310
200430
200510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201030
2011150
2012160
2013210
2014290
2015350
2016330
2017700
2018600
2019750
2020750
2021751
2022730
2023930
2024790
2025750
2026740
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091088, 1984–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P980048Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…Predicate devices include several recently down classified cages, as well as cleared VBR systems: - BAK/C (P980048, Zimmer Spine, Approved 4/20/01) - Affinity Cage System (P000028, Med…
Sulzer Spine-Tech2001—
*P000028Affinity (TM) Cage System
Summary page 1
…tems: - BAK/C (P980048, Zimmer Spine, Approved 4/20/01) - Affinity Cage System (P000028, Medtronic, Approved 6/13/02) - ROI-C VBR (K083857, LDR Spine, Cleare…
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2002—
*K083857LDR Spine Roi-C Implant
Summary page 1
…/01) - Affinity Cage System (P000028, Medtronic, Approved 6/13/02) - ROI-C VBR (K083857, LDR Spine, Cleared 2/12/09) - MC+ Partial VBR (K043479, LDR Spine,…
Ldr Spine USA2009—
*K043479MC+ Partial VBR
Summary page 1
…d 6/13/02) - ROI-C VBR (K083857, LDR Spine, Cleared 2/12/09) - MC+ Partial VBR (K043479, LDR Spine, Cleared 6/30/05)…
Ldr Spine USA2005—

Also cleared against P980048: 53 other devices →

What descends from it? (901)

See all 901

51 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K123206Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion SystemMaxim Surgical2013454
K100214Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek2010389
K102606Avs Anchor-C Cervical Cage SystemStryker Spine2011384
K113559LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion Systme-Roi-C Lordotic ImplantsLdr Spine USA, Inc.2011383
K100698STCCCardinal Spine, LLC2011346
K132999Cervical Stand Alone SystemOrthofix, Inc.2014281
K122588Vusion CS PlusOrtho Development Corp.2013206
K111123Varilift Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemWenzel Spine2011196
K152532AERO -C Cervical Cage SystemStryker Spine2015145
K103034Genesys Spine Interbody Fusion SystemGenesys Spine2010137

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 3 of the 27 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K123206 (Maxim Surgical, 2013) has gone furthest, with 454 descendants of its own.
  • 53 other devices also cite its predicate P980048.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

When used as an intervertebral body fusion device, the LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (ROI-C and MC+ devices) is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of…

Read the full statement (190 words)

When used as an intervertebral body fusion device, the LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (ROI-C and MC+ devices) is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open, anterior approach. Supplemental internal fixation is required to properly utilize this system.

When used as a vertebral body replacement device, the ROI-C and MC+ implants are indicated for use to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The device is intended for use as a partial vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine (from TI to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental internal fixation. Supplemental internal fixation is required to properly utilize this system. These devices are intended to be used with autograft or allograft bone.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091088: LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091088

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026