510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cardiospy Ecg Holter Systems

K140847510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 5, 2014246-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Labtech Kft. · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Dec 5, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K042108 (Novacor, 2005) and 3 other predicates after a 246-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1994. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 5, 2014
Review
246 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K930806 (1994). 27 ancestors in all, the oldest K871344 (1987). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 other ancestor2002: 2 other ancestors1999: 4 other ancestors2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1995: 4 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestor1987: 1 other ancestor2018: 1 descendant clearedK930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K990170 · Holter 2000 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1999K010949 · 2010 Plus Holter for Windows · Agilent Technologies · 2001K042108 · Vista Plus · Novacor · 20051990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors2 generations back: 6 other ancestors3 generations back: 11 other ancestors4 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K042108 · Vista Plus · Novacor · 2005K010949 · 2010 Plus Holter for Windows · Agilent Technologies · 2001K990170 · Holter 2000 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1999K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994−50
  1. Root · 5 generations backK930806 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies · 1994
  2. 4 generations backK955015 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996
  3. 3 generations backK990170 Holter 2000Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1999
  4. 2 generations backK010949 2010 Plus Holter for WindowsAgilent Technologies · 2001
  5. 1 generation backK042108 Vista PlusNovacor · 2005
  6. This deviceK140847 Cardiospy Ecg Holter SystemsLabtech Kft. · 2014
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK182030 Faros MobileBittium Biosignals, Ltd. · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K182030Faros MobileBittium Biosignals, Ltd. · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K930806Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies1994—
−4K955015Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation1996—
−3K990170Holter 2000Zymed Medical Instrumentation1999—
−2K0109492010 Plus Holter for WindowsAgilent Technologies2001—
−1K042108Vista PlusNovacor2005—
0 (this device)K140847Cardiospy Ecg Holter SystemsLabtech Kft.2014—
+1K182030Faros MobileBittium Biosignals, Ltd.2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
199010
199220
199410
199540
199620
199710
199810
199940
200010
200110
200220
200310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140847, 1994–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K042108Vista Plus
Summary page 5
…evice models: EC-1H, EC-2H, EC-3H, EC-12H Predicate devices 1. Vista Plus – Novacor France - K042108 2. Spiderview ELA MEDICAL Inc. - K032466 3.…
Novacor2005—
*K032466Spiderview
Summary page 5
…ce - K042108 2. Spiderview ELA MEDICAL Inc. - K032466 3. Cardio ID+(RZI153±) - ScottCare (ROZINN ELECTRONICS Inc.) - K022540 4.…
Ela Medical, Inc.2003—
*K022540Cardio ID+(RZ153+)
Summary page 5
…c. - K032466 3. Cardio ID+(RZI153±) - ScottCare (ROZINN ELECTRONICS Inc.) - K022540 4. Digitrak Plus - BRAEMAR CORP - K993617 Device Des…
Rozinn Electronics, Inc.2002—
*K993617Digitrakplus Holter Recorder
Summary page 5
…ttCare (ROZINN ELECTRONICS Inc.) - K022540 4. Digitrak Plus - BRAEMAR CORP - K993617 Device Description The battery powered Cardiospy ECG Holter System provides 1, 2, 3 and 12 channel recordings,…
Braemar Corp.1999—

Also cleared against K042108: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K182030Faros MobileBittium Biosignals, Ltd.20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 27 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K182030 (Bittium Biosignals, Ltd., 2018) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K042108.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Cardiospy ECG Holter System is intended for use in a clinical, by qualified professionals, for patients requiring ambulatory (Holter) monitoring 24, 48, 72, 168 h hours. Such monitoring is most frequently used for purpose of prospective and retrospective cardiac data and arrhythmia analysis. The System, among others, provides the detection and reporting features appropriate to the indications below for children and adults of all ages (up to 2 years)…

Read the full statement (143 words)

The Cardiospy ECG Holter System is intended for use in a clinical, by qualified professionals, for patients requiring ambulatory (Holter) monitoring 24, 48, 72, 168 h hours. Such monitoring is most frequently used for purpose of prospective and retrospective cardiac data and arrhythmia analysis.

The System, among others, provides the detection and reporting features appropriate to the indications below for children and adults of all ages (up to 2 years):

* Evaluation of patients with symptoms related to rhythm disturbances or symptoms suggesting arrhythmia.

* Evaluation of patients for ST segment changes

* Evaluation of patients with pacemakers

Reporting of time domain heart rate variability

« Evaluation of a patient's response after resuming occupational or recreational activities (e.g., after MI. or cardiac surgery.)

« Evaluation of ECG documenting therapeutic interventions in individual patients or groups of patients

* Clinical and epidemiological research studies

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140847: Cardiospy Ecg Holter Systems.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140847

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026