510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lucent; Lucent Ti-Bond Systems

K150061510(k) TraditionalCleared May 19, 2015126-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spinal Elements, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on May 19, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K071724 (Spinal Elements, Inc., 2007) and 2 other predicates after a 126-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2001. 135 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 19, 2015
Review
126 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to P980048 (2001). 8 ancestors in all. 135 later devices descend from it, 10 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2007: 2 other ancestors2009: 1 other ancestor2008: 1 other ancestor2020: 6 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2019: 5 descendants cleared2021: 7 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2022: 17 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2024: 22 descendants cleared2025: 28 descendants cleared2023: 21 descendants cleared2026: 23 descendants clearedP980048 · Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System · Sulzer Spine-Tech · 2001K112036 · Calix PC Spinal Implant System · X-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2011K110632 · Lucent or Lucent Magnum · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2012 · recalledK122967 · Lucent · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2013200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 10 descendants2 generations forward: 18 descendants3 generations forward: 14 descendants4 generations forward: 21 descendants5 generations forward: 13 descendants6 generations forward: 15 descendants7 generations forward: 18 descendants8 generations forward: 15 descendants9 generations forward: 10 descendants10 generations forward: 1 descendant K122967 · Lucent · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2013K110632 · Lucent or Lucent Magnum · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2012 · recalledK112036 · Calix PC Spinal Implant System · X-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2011P980048 · Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System · Sulzer Spine-Tech · 20010+5+10
  1. Root · 4 generations backP980048 Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion SystemSulzer Spine-Tech · 2001
  2. 3 generations backK112036 Calix PC Spinal Implant SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2011
  3. 2 generations backK110632 Lucent or Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2012 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK122967 LucentSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2013
  5. This deviceK150061 Lucent; Lucent Ti-Bond SystemsSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2015
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 107 of its ownK170235 Lucent®Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2017
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 106 of its ownK152011 Lucent Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2016
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 98 of its ownK181837 Spinal Elements Ti-Bond coated devicesSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2018
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 93 of its ownK190546 NEXXT MATRIXX Stand Alone Cervical SystemNexxt Spine, LLC · 2019
  10. Descendant · 3 generations on · 72 of its ownK200543 NEXXT MATRIXX Stand Alone Cervical-Turn Lock (-TL) SystemNexxt Spine, LLC · 2020

Showing 5 of 135 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2016: 12017: 22018: 32019: 52020: 62021: 72022: 172023: 212024: 222025: 282026: 23
2016high 28 (2025) · low 1 (2016)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 135 · See all
  • K170235Lucent®Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly107descendants
  • K152011Lucent Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2016 · cites it directly106descendants
  • K181837Spinal Elements Ti-Bond coated devicesSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2018 · cites it directly98descendants
  • K190546NEXXT MATRIXX Stand Alone Cervical SystemNexxt Spine, LLC · 2019 · 2 generations on93descendants
  • K200543NEXXT MATRIXX Stand Alone Cervical-Turn Lock (-TL) SystemNexxt Spine, LLC · 2020 · 3 generations on72descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4P980048Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion SystemSulzer Spine-Tech2001—
−3K112036Calix PC Spinal Implant SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc.2011—
−2K110632Lucent or Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc.20121
−1K122967LucentSpinal Elements, Inc.2013—
0 (this device)K150061Lucent; Lucent Ti-Bond SystemsSpinal Elements, Inc.2015—
+1K170235Lucent®Spinal Elements, Inc.2017—
+1K152011Lucent Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceSpinal Elements, Inc.2016—
+1K181837Spinal Elements Ti-Bond coated devicesSpinal Elements, Inc.2018—
+2K190546NEXXT MATRIXX Stand Alone Cervical SystemNexxt Spine, LLC2019—
+3K200543NEXXT MATRIXX Stand Alone Cervical-Turn Lock (-TL) SystemNexxt Spine, LLC2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200720
200810
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201720
201830
201950
202060
202170
2022170
2023210
2024220
2025280
2026230
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K150061, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K071724Lucent
Summary page 4
…MAX III. PREDICATE DEVICE Primary Predicate Name Lucent® Regulatory Class Class II Submission No K071724 Device Code MAX Predicate Name Lucent Ti-Bond® Regulatory Class…
Spinal Elements, Inc.2007—
*K110632Lucent or Lucent Magnum
Summary page 4
…ce Code MAX Predicate Name Lucent Ti-Bond® Regulatory Class Class II Submission No K110632 Device Code MAX…
Spinal Elements, Inc.20121
*K122967Lucent
Summary page 5
…tervertebral Body Fusion Device Predicate Name Lucent® Lateral Regulatory Class Class II Submission No K122967 Device Code MAX IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION The Lucent® device is an intervertebral body fusion device for…
Spinal Elements, Inc.2013—

Also cleared against K071724: 38 other devices →

What descends from it? (135)

See all 135

10 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K170235Lucent®Spinal Elements, Inc.2017107
K152011Lucent Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceSpinal Elements, Inc.2016106
K181837Spinal Elements Ti-Bond coated devicesSpinal Elements, Inc.201898
K203254Lucent 3D Spinal SystemSpinal Elements, Inc.20218
K200084Zavation IBF SystemZavation Medical Products, LLC20208
K171657ShurFit 2C Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemPrecision Spine, Inc.20174
K210044Crystal Spinal System & Vertu Spinal System, Lucent Spinal System, Zeus Spinal System…Spinal Elements, Inc.20211
K183259Idys™ TLIF TiVacClariance, Sas20191
K221182Southern Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)Southern Medical (Pty), Ltd.20220
K181096Avenue P Cage SystemZimmer Biomet Spine, Inc.20190

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 8 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K170235 (Spinal Elements, Inc., 2017) has gone furthest, with 107 descendants of its own.
  • 38 other devices also cite its predicate K071724.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

Lucent® and Lucent Ti-Bond® are intervertebral body fusion devices intended for spinal fusion procedures at one or two contiguous levels (L2-S1) in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. These patients may…

Read the full statement (151 words)

Lucent® and Lucent Ti-Bond® are intervertebral body fusion devices intended for spinal fusion procedures at one or two contiguous levels (L2-S1) in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved spinal level(s).

These devices are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems, anterior plate systems, and anterior screw and rod systems).

These devices are intended to be used with autogenous bone graft. Patients must have undergone a regimen of at least six (6) months non-operative treatment prior to being treated with these devices.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K150061: Lucent; Lucent Ti-Bond Systems.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K150061

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026