510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)

K161485510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 6, 201698-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Nanovis, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Sep 6, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K110442 (Nanovis, LLC, 2011) and 2 other predicates after a 98-day review. Its family tree reaches back 15 generations to 2001. 1 of the 122 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 6, 2016
Review
98 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 15 generations to K003155 (2001). 116 ancestors in all, the oldest K792352 (1979). 5 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly. 1 of the 122 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2014: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 other ancestor2012: 1 other ancestor2011: 2 other ancestors2010: 2 other ancestors2009: 8 other ancestors2008: 14 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall12007: 10 other ancestors1999: 3 other ancestors2005: 6 other ancestors2004: 16 other ancestors2003: 13 other ancestors2002: 6 other ancestors2001: 8 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors2006: 3 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1984: 1 other ancestor1998: 1 other ancestor1980: 1 other ancestor1979: 1 other ancestor2019: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant clearedK003155 · Vertebral Body Replacement · Osteotech, Inc. · 2001K012254 · VBR · Osteotech, Inc. · 2001×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K021791 (2002), K023570 (2002), K030601 (2003) ×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K040536 (2004), K041556 (2004), K043561 (2004) ×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K060719 (2006), K062133 (2006), K070173 (2007) K073285 · Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody Device · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008K100214 · Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion Device · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010K110442 · Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System · Nanovis, LLC · 2011K140280 · Forticore · Nanovis, LLC · 201419801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 18 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall13 generations back: 20 other ancestors4 generations back: 28 other ancestors5 generations back: 18 other ancestors6 generations back: 9 other ancestors7 generations back: 7 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 2 descendants K140280 · Forticore · Nanovis, LLC · 2014K110442 · Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System · Nanovis, LLC · 2011K100214 · Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion Device · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010K073285 · Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody Device · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008K070173 · Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2007K062133 · Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Spinal and Biologics Div · 2006K060719 · Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2006K043561 · Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004K041556 · Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004K040536 · Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004K030601 · Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003K023570 · Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002K021791 · Verte-Stack Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002K012254 · VBR · Osteotech, Inc. · 2001K003155 · Vertebral Body Replacement · Osteotech, Inc. · 2001−15−10−50
  1. Root · 15 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 11 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK100214 Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010
  4. 2 generations backK110442 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC · 2011
  5. 1 generation backK140280 ForticoreNanovis, LLC · 2014
  6. This deviceK161485 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC · 2016
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK171312 FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC · 2018
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK191822 Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC · 2019
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK241605 Adaptix™ PEEK Interbody System with Nanotechnology; Capstone…Nanovis, LLC · 2024
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK230936 Anatomic PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System with NanotechnologyNanovis, LLC · 2023
  11. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK173832 InTice™-C Porous Ti Cervical Interbody SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2018 · Recalled
Show all 15 generations
  1. Root · 15 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 14 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  3. 13 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  4. 12 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  5. 11 generations backK030601 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
  6. 10 generations backK040536 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  7. 9 generations backK041556 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  8. 8 generations backK043561 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  9. 7 generations backK060719 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2006
  10. 6 generations backK062133 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Spinal and Biologics Div · 2006
  11. 5 generations backK070173 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2007
  12. 4 generations backK073285 Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  13. 3 generations backK100214 Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010
  14. 2 generations backK110442 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC · 2011
  15. 1 generation backK140280 ForticoreNanovis, LLC · 2014
  16. This deviceK161485 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC · 2016

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K171312FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC · 2018 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K191822Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC · 2019 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K241605Adaptix™ PEEK Interbody System with Nanotechnology; Capstone Control™ PEEK Spinal System…Nanovis, LLC · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K230936Anatomic PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System with NanotechnologyNanovis, LLC · 2023 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K173832InTice™-C Porous Ti Cervical Interbody SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−15K003155Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc.2001—
−14K012254VBROsteotech, Inc.2001—
−13K021791Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−12K023570Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−11K030601Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2003—
−10K040536Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
−9K041556Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
−8K043561Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
−7K060719Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2006—
−6K062133Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Spinal and Biologics Div2006—
−5K070173Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2007—
−4K073285Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
−3K100214Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek2010—
−2K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC2011—
−1K140280ForticoreNanovis, LLC2014—
0 (this device)K161485Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC2016—
+1K171312FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC2018—
+1K191822Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC2019—
+2K241605Adaptix™ PEEK Interbody System with Nanotechnology; Capstone Control™ PEEK…Nanovis, LLC2024—
+2K230936Anatomic PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System with NanotechnologyNanovis, LLC2023—
+1K173832InTice™-C Porous Ti Cervical Interbody SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc.20181

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197910
198010
198410
199620
199810
199930
200010
200180
200260
2003130
2004160
200560
200630
2007100
2008141
200980
201020
201120
201210
201310
201410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201820
201910
202310
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K161485, 2001–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System
Summary page 6
…Core® devices also incorporate a tantalum marker per ASTM F560. Primary Predicate: Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System (Nanovis LLC, K110442) Additional Predicates: FortiCore® (Nanovis LLC, K140280) Aleutian® IBF System (K2M, Inc., K133614) Pe…
Nanovis, LLC2011—
*K140280Forticore
Summary page 6
…marker per ASTM F560. Primary Predicate: Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System (Nanovis LLC, K110442) Additional Predicates: FortiCore® (Nanovis LLC, K140280) Aleutian® IBF System (K2M, Inc., K133614) Performance Data: Static and dynamic compression testi…
Nanovis, LLC2014—
*K133614Aleutian Ibf System
Summary page 6
…rvertebral Body Fusion System (Nanovis LLC, K110442) Additional Predicates: FortiCore® (Nanovis LLC, K140280) Aleutian® IBF System (K2M, Inc., K133614) Performance Data: Static and dynamic compression testing per ASTM F2077 and/or dimensional analy…
K2m, Inc.2014—

Also cleared against K110442: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (5)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K171312FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC20183
K191822Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC20192
K173832InTice™-C Porous Ti Cervical Interbody SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc.20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations back · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10 months on median.
  • 12 of the 116 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K171312 (Nanovis, LLC, 2018) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K110442.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one spinal level from C2-T1. These patients should have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. Nanovis…

Read the full statement (392 words)

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one spinal level from C2-T1. These patients should have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and in combination with supplemental fixation indicated for cervical fusion procedures.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one or two contiguous spinal levels from L2-S1. These patients should have had six months of nonoperative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery and/or may have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved spinal level(s). Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and in combination with supplemental fixation indicated for lumbar spinal fusion procedures.

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, FortiCore® is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one spinal level from C2-T1. These patients should have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. FortiCore® devices are to be used with autogenous bone graft and in combination with supplemental fixation indicated for cervical fusion procedures.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, FortiCore® is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one or two contiguous spinal levels from L2-S1. These patients should have had six months of nonoperative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery and/or may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved spinal level(s). FortiCore® devices are to be used with autogenous bone graft and in combination with supplemental fixation indicated for lumbar spinal fusion procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K161485: Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K161485

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026