510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

3.3 mm Laurimed Microdebrider; 4.0 mm Laurimed Microdebrider

K163247510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 9, 2017111-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.4250

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Laurimed, LLC · ERL Drill, Surgical, Ent (Electric Or Pneumatic) Including Handpiece

Cleared on Mar 9, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K161101 (Laurimed, LLC, 2016) and 1 other predicate after a 111-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2000.

Decided
Mar 9, 2017
Review
111 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ERL
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K002224 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK002224 XPS 3000 SystemMedtronic Xomed · 2000
  2. 3 generations backK041413 XPS 3000 SystemMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · 2004
  3. 2 generations backK133133 Laurimed Polypvac MicrodebriderLaurimed, LLC · 2013 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK161101 PolypVac Microdebrider (3.3mm and 4.0mm)Laurimed, LLC · 2016
  5. This deviceK163247 3.3 mm Laurimed Microdebrider; 4.0 mm Laurimed MicrodebriderLaurimed, LLC · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K002224XPS 3000 SystemMedtronic Xomed2000—
−3K041413XPS 3000 SystemMedtronic Xomed, Inc.2004—
−2K133133Laurimed Polypvac MicrodebriderLaurimed, LLC20131
−1K161101PolypVac Microdebrider (3.3mm and 4.0mm)Laurimed, LLC2016—
0 (this device)K1632473.3 mm Laurimed Microdebrider; 4.0 mm Laurimed MicrodebriderLaurimed, LLC2017—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K163247, 2000–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ERL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ERL device

  1. #1 K243280 Piezomed Pro (Piezomed Pro module M-PM100…score 12.0 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K161101PolypVac Microdebrider (3.3mm and 4.0mm)
Summary page 4
…II. Predicate Device [§807.92(a)(3)] The subject PolypVac Microdebrider is substantially equivalent to the primary predicate, the PolypVac Microdebrider (K161101), and the secondary predicate, the Medtronic Xomed XPS 3000 (K041413). IV. Device Description [§807.92(a)(4)] Th…
Laurimed, LLC2016—
*K041413XPS 3000 System
Summary page 4
…ider is substantially equivalent to the primary predicate, the PolypVac Microdebrider (K161101), and the secondary predicate, the Medtronic Xomed XPS 3000 (K041413). IV. Device Description [§807.92(a)(4)] The PolypVac Microdebrider is a shaver system intended for the resection of so…
Medtronic Xomed, Inc.2004—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All ERL devices

ERL Drill, Surgical, Ent (Electric Or Pneumatic) Including Handpiece: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ERL

1in 2025

2008: 62009: 12012: 22013: 22014: 12015: 32016: 42017: 22018: 12019: 12020: 12021: 12022: 32024: 12025: 1
2007high 6 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ERL

191in 2022

2008: 181 days median2015: 86 days median2016: 180 days median2022: 191 days median
2007high 191 (2022) · low 86 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ERL

1in 2021

2009: 12013: 32020: 52021: 1
2007high 5 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ERL

1,469in 2025

2007: 1122008: 602009: 2492010: 4442011: 1,0682012: 1,3792013: 3,2312014: 1,9752015: 2,6302016: 1,4552017: 9992018: 1,3802019: 2,5152020: 2,3692021: 2,2832022: 1,5742023: 1,7252024: 1,5882025: 1,469
2007high 3,231 (2013) · low 60 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ERL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—0112
20086181060
20091—1249
20100—0444
20110—01,068
20122—01,379
20132—33,231
20141—01,975
201538602,630
2016418001,455
20172—0999
20181—01,380
20191—02,515
20201—52,369
20211—12,283
2022319101,574
20230—01,725
20241—01,588
20251—01,469
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The PolypVac Microdebrider is a shaver system intended for the resection of soft tissue and thin bone as part of the following endoscopic sinus procedures: ethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, polypectomy, turbinectomy / turbinate reduction, sphenoidotomy, and frontal recess dissection.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K163247: 3.3 mm Laurimed Microdebrider; 4.0 mm Laurimed Microdebrider.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K163247

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026