510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

TELIX K Interbody System

K170890510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 2, 201767-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biedermann Motech GmbH & Co. KG · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jun 2, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K081917 (Depuy Spine, Inc., 2009) after a 67-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1984.

Decided
Jun 2, 2017
Review
67 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K841189 (1984). 17 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  4. 2 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
  5. 1 generation backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
  6. This deviceK170890 TELIX K Interbody SystemBiedermann Motech GmbH & Co. KG · 2017
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 8 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 7 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 6 generations backK020522 Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2002
  5. 5 generations backK030833 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  6. 4 generations backK031635 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  7. 3 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  8. 2 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
  9. 1 generation backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
  10. This deviceK170890 TELIX K Interbody SystemBiedermann Motech GmbH & Co. KG · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−8K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−7K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−6K020522Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2002—
−5K030833Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−4K031635Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−3K041722Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2004—
−2K052746Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2005—
−1K081917Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc.2009—
0 (this device)K170890TELIX K Interbody SystemBiedermann Motech GmbH & Co. KG2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200010
200120
200210
200310
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K170890, 1984–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K081917Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard Systems
Summary page 5
…0(k) Premarket Notification 3. Predicate Device Predicate Device:  Depuy Spine Devex System - DePuy Spine, Inc (K081917) Reference Devices:  Aleutian IBF System – K2M, Inc. (K082698)  MectaLIF – Med…
Depuy Spine, Inc.2009—
†K082698Aleutian Ibf SystemK2m, Inc.2009—
†K110927MectalifMedacta International20111
†K162358T-PAL Spacer System, T-PAL Titanium Spacer System, SYNFIX Evolution SystemSynthes USA Products, LLC2016—

Also cleared against K081917: 35 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 33 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • None of the 17 ancestors has a recall.
  • 35 other devices also cite its predicate K081917.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The TELIX K Interbody System is indicated for use as intervertebral body fusion device in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies) at one or two contiguous levels of the lumbar spine (L2-S1).

Patients should have six months of non-operative treatment prior to surgery.

These implants are used to facilitate fusion in the lumbar spine and are placed via a TLIF approach using autogenous bone.

These implants are intended for use with Biedermann Motech supplemental internal fixation products.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K170890: TELIX K Interbody System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K170890

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026