510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™

K172212510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 9, 2018169-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ctl Medical Corporation · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Jan 9, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K121569 (Accel Spine, 2012) and 1 other predicate after a 169-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 1984. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jan 9, 2018
Review
169 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K841189 (1984). 48 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2017: 1 other ancestor2009: 2 other ancestors2008: 3 other ancestors2007: 2 other ancestors2002: 5 other ancestors2001: 9 other ancestors1999: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 other ancestor2004: 7 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestor2003: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor2023: 1 descendant clearedK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K080728 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2008×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K083857 (2009), K091088 (2009) ×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K113559 (2011), K120840 (2012), K121569 (2012) 19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK113559 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion Systme-Roi-C Lordotic ImplantsLdr Spine USA, Inc. · 2011
  4. 2 generations backK120840 Lexus Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion Cage SystemL&K BIOMED Co., Ltd. · 2012
  5. 1 generation backK121569 Matisse Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage SystemAccel Spine · 2012
  6. This deviceK172212 MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™Ctl Medical Corporation · 2018
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK220513 NITRO Interbody Fusion Cage System FamilyCtl Medical Corporation · 2023
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 12 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 11 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 10 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 9 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
  7. 7 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  8. 6 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  9. 5 generations backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  10. 4 generations backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  11. 3 generations backK113559 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion Systme-Roi-C Lordotic ImplantsLdr Spine USA, Inc. · 2011
  12. 2 generations backK120840 Lexus Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion Cage SystemL&K BIOMED Co., Ltd. · 2012
  13. 1 generation backK121569 Matisse Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage SystemAccel Spine · 2012
  14. This deviceK172212 MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™Ctl Medical Corporation · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K220513NITRO Interbody Fusion Cage System FamilyCtl Medical Corporation · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−12K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−11K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−10K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−9K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−8K033109Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X2004—
−7K043479MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA2005—
−6K080728LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2008—
−5K083857LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2009—
−4K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA2009—
−3K113559LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion Systme-Roi-C Lordotic ImplantsLdr Spine USA, Inc.2011—
−2K120840Lexus Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion Cage SystemL&K BIOMED Co., Ltd.2012—
−1K121569Matisse Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage SystemAccel Spine2012—
0 (this device)K172212MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™Ctl Medical Corporation2018—
+1K220513NITRO Interbody Fusion Cage System FamilyCtl Medical Corporation2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200010
200190
200250
200320
200470
200510
200720
200830
200920
201710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K172212, 1984–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K121569Matisse Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System
Summary page 5
…Page 2 of 3 Class Class II Classification Number 21 CFR 888.3080 Predicate Devices Primary Predicate: K121569, MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System; and Additional Predicate: K162682 MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody F…
Accel Spine2012—
*K162682MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System
Summary page 5
…lassification Number 21 CFR 888.3080 Predicate Devices Primary Predicate: K121569, MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System; and Additional Predicate: K162682 MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System. Device Description Indications for Use: MATISSE Anterior Cervical Int…
Ctl Medical Corporation2017—

Also cleared against K121569: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K220513NITRO Interbody Fusion Cage System FamilyCtl Medical Corporation20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 34 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 4 of the 48 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K220513 (Ctl Medical Corporation, 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K121569.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™ is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one-disc level. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™ is used to facilitate intervertebral body…

Read the full statement (123 words)

MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™ is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one-disc level. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™ is used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the cervical spine at the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft bone. MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™ is to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the cervical spine. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K172212: MATISSE Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage System, Ti-PEEK™.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K172212

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026