510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Mecta-C with titanium markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with titanium markers

K172587510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 18, 201721-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medacta International S.A. · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Sep 18, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K112862 (Medacta International, 2011) and 1 other predicate after a 21-day review. Its family tree reaches back 16 generations to 1984. 1 of the 102 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall.

Decided
Sep 18, 2017
Review
21 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 16 generations to K841189 (1984). 101 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 102 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 6 other ancestors3 generations back: 23 other ancestors4 generations back: 24 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall15 generations back: 15 other ancestors6 generations back: 11 other ancestors7 generations back: 5 other ancestors K142744 · Mecta-C TiPEEK · Medacta International · 2015K133192 · Mectalif Tipeek · Medacta International · 2014K131671 · Mectalif · Medacta International · 2013K120024 · Mectalif Transforaminal · Medacta International S.A. · 2012K110927 · Mectalif · Medacta International · 2011 · recalledK100175 · Clydesdale Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010K073291 · Capstone Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008K072120 · Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K062759 · Paramount VBR System · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K042930 · Spacevision Cage System · Spine Vision, Inc. · 2004K041888 · Curved Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004K031757 · Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K022793 · Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984−15−10−50
  1. Root · 16 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 12 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK131671 MectalifMedacta International · 2013
  4. 2 generations backK133192 Mectalif TipeekMedacta International · 2014
  5. 1 generation backK142744 Mecta-C TiPEEKMedacta International · 2015
  6. This deviceK172587 Mecta-C with titanium markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with titanium markersMedacta International S.A. · 2017
Show all 16 generations
  1. Root · 16 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 15 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 14 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 13 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 12 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 11 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 10 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 9 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 8 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 7 generations backK073291 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  11. 6 generations backK100175 Clydesdale Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010
  12. 5 generations backK110927 MectalifMedacta International · 2011 · Recalled
  13. 4 generations backK120024 Mectalif TransforaminalMedacta International S.A. · 2012
  14. 3 generations backK131671 MectalifMedacta International · 2013
  15. 2 generations backK133192 Mectalif TipeekMedacta International · 2014
  16. 1 generation backK142744 Mecta-C TiPEEKMedacta International · 2015
  17. This deviceK172587 Mecta-C with titanium markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with titanium markersMedacta International S.A. · 2017

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−16K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−15K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−14K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−13K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−12K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−11K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−10K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−9K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−8K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−7K073291Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
−6K100175Clydesdale Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2010—
−5K110927MectalifMedacta International20111
−4K120024Mectalif TransforaminalMedacta International S.A.2012—
−3K131671MectalifMedacta International2013—
−2K133192Mectalif TipeekMedacta International2014—
−1K142744Mecta-C TiPEEKMedacta International2015—
0 (this device)K172587Mecta-C with titanium markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with titanium markersMedacta International S.A.2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200190
200280
200380
2004120
200590
200620
200760
2008131
200980
201030
201120
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K172587, 1984–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K112862Mecta-C
Summary page 4
…on Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Device Classification 2 III. Predicate Device Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following devices: x Mecta-C, K112862, Medacta International SA x Mecta-C TiPEEK, K142744, Medacta International SA IV. Device Description The purpose of this…
Medacta International2011—
*K142744Mecta-C TiPEEK
Summary page 4
…tion 2 III. Predicate Device Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following devices: x Mecta-C, K112862, Medacta International SA x Mecta-C TiPEEK, K142744, Medacta International SA IV. Device Description The purpose of this submission is to add the Mecta-C with titanium markers…
Medacta International2015—

Also cleared against K112862: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 4 generations back · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 33 years and passes through 11 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 15 of the 101 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K112862.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

The Mecta-C intervertebral body fusion device is indicated for anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients. The device systems are designed for use with autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. One device may be used per intervertebral space. The implants are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation. The Mecta-C device is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2-T1, for the treatment of…

Read the full statement (116 words)

The Mecta-C intervertebral body fusion device is indicated for anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients. The device systems are designed for use with autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. One device may be used per intervertebral space. The implants are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation.

The Mecta-C device is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2-T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the device.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K172587: Mecta-C with titanium markers and Mecta-C TiPEEK with titanium markers.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K172587

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026