510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Double Medical Cage System

K172828510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 1, 2018136-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Double Medical Technology, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Feb 1, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K133053 (Weigao Orthopaedic Device Co., Ltd., 2014) and 1 other predicate after a 136-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1984. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 1, 2018
Review
136 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K841189 (1984). 30 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK073291 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK133053 Milestone Spinal SystemWeigao Orthopaedic Device Co., Ltd. · 2014
  6. This deviceK172828 Double Medical Cage SystemDouble Medical Technology, Inc. · 2018
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK253151 Fule Interbody Fusion Cage SystemBeijing Fule Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd. · 2026
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 9 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 8 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 7 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 6 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 5 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 4 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 2 generations backK073291 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  11. 1 generation backK133053 Milestone Spinal SystemWeigao Orthopaedic Device Co., Ltd. · 2014
  12. This deviceK172828 Double Medical Cage SystemDouble Medical Technology, Inc. · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K253151Fule Interbody Fusion Cage SystemBeijing Fule Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd. · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−10K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−9K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−8K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−5K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−4K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−3K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−2K073291Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
−1K133053Milestone Spinal SystemWeigao Orthopaedic Device Co., Ltd.2014—
0 (this device)K172828Double Medical Cage SystemDouble Medical Technology, Inc.2018—
+1K253151Fule Interbody Fusion Cage SystemBeijing Fule Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200130
200230
200320
200440
200510
201010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K172828, 1984–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K133053Milestone Spinal System
Summary page 4
…l Body Fusion Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulatory Classification: Class II Product Code: MAX Predicate Device Primary predicate device: K133053 Weigao Milestone Spinal System Additional Predicates: K100089 Synthes T-PAL Spacer Device Description Doub…
Weigao Orthopaedic Device Co., Ltd.2014—
*K100089Synthes T-Pal Spacer
Summary page 4
…assification: Class II Product Code: MAX Predicate Device Primary predicate device: K133053 Weigao Milestone Spinal System Additional Predicates: K100089 Synthes T-PAL Spacer Device Description Double Medical Cage System consists of cages of various lengths and heights, wh…
Synthes Spine20101

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K253151Fule Interbody Fusion Cage SystemBeijing Fule Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 34 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 5 of the 30 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K253151 (Beijing Fule Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd., 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

Double Medical Cage System is indicated for use in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two levels from L2 to L5 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion combined with supplemental fixation. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The Cage should be packed with autogenous bone graft (i.e. autograft).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K172828: Double Medical Cage System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K172828

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026