510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2024

Intelli-C

K173631510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 11, 2018229-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Nrt X-Ray A/S · OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System

Cleared on Jul 11, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K033486 (Nrt-Nordisk Rontgen Teknik A/S, 2003) after a 229-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Jul 11, 2018
Review
229 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OWB
Recalls
4
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K961374 (1996). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK961374 Philips Multidiagnost 4Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK033486 GE Precision MpiNrt-Nordisk Rontgen Teknik A/S · 2003 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK173631 Intelli-CNrt X-Ray A/S · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K961374Philips Multidiagnost 4Philips Medical Systems, Inc.19963
−1K033486GE Precision MpiNrt-Nordisk Rontgen Teknik A/S20037
0 (this device)K173631Intelli-CNrt X-Ray A/S2018—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K173631, 1996–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OWB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OWB device

  1. #1 K251602 Alphenix, INFX-8000V/B, INFX-8000V/S, V9.6…score 18.2 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K033486GE Precision Mpi
Summary page 4
…(secondary): JAA Predicate device: Trade name: GE Precision MPi Premarket Notification No.: K033486 Manufacturer: NRT X-Ray A/S Birkegaardsvej 16…
Nrt-Nordisk Rontgen Teknik A/S20037

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Apr 17, 2024Class IIZ-1784-2024Device DesignX-ray system C-arm may experience uncontrolled motion if 1) AC motor controller firmware has a faulty setting, 2) the Motor/gear assembly is worn, 3) CAT movement is driven at maximum speed and angulated more than 75 deg. from vertical…
Apr 27, 2023Class IIZ-1669-2023Device DesignThere is a potential that the drive shaft in the detector up/down (IDE) movement of the X-Ray machine may break which causes the detector to move until it is stopped by the movement end-stop.
Apr 27, 2023Class IIZ-1668-2023Device DesignThere is a potential that the drive shaft in the detector up/down (IDE) movement of the X-Ray machine may break which causes the detector to move until it is stopped by the movement end-stop.
Jan 21, 2022Class IIZ-0526-2022Process controlFriction rubber block in the clamping mechanism was missing in the Footrest. It may slip down along the patient table while in use with a patient. This accessory is designed to use with Intelli-C, Right and Intelli-C, Left.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 14.6 years on median.
  • 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All OWB devices

OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OWB

22in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 92010: 72011: 62012: 62013: 112014: 152015: 112016: 162017: 202018: 232019: 92020: 162021: 242022: 212023: 122024: 132025: 222026 (partial year): 15
2007high 24 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OWB

148in 2025

2007: 52 days median2008: 135 days median2009: 99 days median2010: 66 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 37 days median2013: 119 days median2014: 158 days median2015: 66 days median2016: 103 days median2017: 76 days median2018: 54 days median2019: 174 days median2020: 53 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 90 days median2023: 152 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 148 days median2026 (partial year): 221 days median
2007high 221 (2026) · low 37 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OWB

42so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12013: 102014: 92015: 352016: 132017: 132018: 62019: 72020: 82021: 312022: 242023: 222024: 112025: 302026 (partial year): 42
2007high 42 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OWB

14,008in 2025

2007: 12011: 12012: 12013: 272014: 1032015: 2,1342016: 4,0742017: 1,6042018: 1,4492019: 1,5582020: 1,5812021: 1,9812022: 2,9322023: 7,6042024: 7,9422025: 14,008
2007high 14,008 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OWB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200735201
2008413510
200999900
201076600
201167901
201263701
2013111191027
2014151589103
20151166352,134
201616103134,074
20172076131,604
2018235461,449
2019917471,558
2020165381,581
20212460311,981
20222190242,932
202312152227,604
202413126117,942
2025221483014,008
20261522142—

What is it indicated for?

The Intelli-C is indicated for use as a multipurpose diagnostic X-ray system for universal radiographic, radioscopic and fluoroscopic studies. With its C-arm and digital flat detector, it can perform a range of applications including interventional procedures, vascular and non-vascular procedures, specialized applications including angiographic studies of the entire body on adults and paediatrics.

The Intelli-C system is only indicated for use by trained professionals.

The Intelli-C is not intended for mammography studies.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K173631: Intelli-C.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K173631

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026