510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2023

Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (OLLIF)

K173947510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 25, 2018210-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Advanced Research Medical, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jul 25, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K090064 (Eminent Spine, 2009) and 1 other predicate after a 210-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1984. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jul 25, 2018
Review
210 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K841189 (1984). 34 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor2008: 2 other ancestors2002: 4 other ancestors2001: 9 other ancestors1999: 2 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor2004: 3 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestorK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K090064 · Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System · Eminent Spine · 2009 · recalled19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 8 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 6 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 5 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 4 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 3 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
  7. 2 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  8. 1 generation backK090064 Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine · 2009 · Recalled
  9. This deviceK173947 Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (OLLIF)Advanced Research Medical, LLC · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−7K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−6K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−5K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−4K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−3K033109Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X2004—
−2K043479MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA2005—
−1K090064Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine20091
0 (this device)K173947Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (OLLIF)Advanced Research Medical, LLC2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200190
200240
200310
200430
200510
200820
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K173947, 1984–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K090064Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 4
…terbody Fusion System (OLLIF) PRIMARY PREDICATE DEVICE Python Interbody Fusion Device, Eminent Spine (K090064) REFERENCE PREDICATE DEVICE Buttress (Fang) Plate System, Eminent Spine…
Eminent Spine20091
*K090415Eminent Spine Buttress (Fang) Plate System
Summary page 4
…(K090064) REFERENCE PREDICATE DEVICE Buttress (Fang) Plate System, Eminent Spine (K090415) DEVICE DESCRIPTION The Lumbar Interbody Fusion System consists of instruments and Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V per ASTM F136) impl…
Eminent Spine20091

Also cleared against K090064: 33 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 14, 2023Class IIZ-1698-2024Device DesignPotential shearing of the disposable blade may occur and be contained within the of Flexible Curette Shaft Assembly during surgery.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 34 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 7 of the 34 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 33 other devices also cite its predicate K090064.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

This system is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate fusion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K173947: Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (OLLIF).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K173947

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026