510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Veolity

K201501510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 23, 2021263-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

MeVis Medical Solutions AG · OEB Lung Computed Tomography System, Computer-Aided Detection

Cleared on Feb 23, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K043617 (Hologic, Inc., 2007) and 3 other predicates after a 263-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1991.

Decided
Feb 23, 2021
Review
263 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OEB
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K913770 (1991). 38 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK913770 Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co. · 1991
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK043333 VITREA2, Version 3.7 Medical Image Processing SystemVital Images, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK151283 Lung Analysis SoftwareVital Images, Inc. · 2015
  5. 1 generation backK162484 Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2017
  6. This deviceK201501 VeolityMeVis Medical Solutions AG · 2021
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK913770 Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co. · 1991
  2. 8 generations backK960613 GE Advantage Windows Review WorkstationGE Medical Systems · 1996
  3. 7 generations backK020483 Advantage Workstation 4.1GE Medical Systems · 2002 · Recalled
  4. 6 generations backK023003 Imagechecker-CT WorkstationR2 Technology, Inc. · 2002
  5. 5 generations backK032748 VITREA2, Version 3.4 Medical Image Processing SoftwareVital Images, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  6. 4 generations backK040305 VITREA2 Version 3.5Vital Images, Inc. · 2004
  7. 3 generations backK043333 VITREA2, Version 3.7 Medical Image Processing SystemVital Images, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  8. 2 generations backK151283 Lung Analysis SoftwareVital Images, Inc. · 2015
  9. 1 generation backK162484 Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2017
  10. This deviceK201501 VeolityMeVis Medical Solutions AG · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K913770Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co.1991—
−8K960613GE Advantage Windows Review WorkstationGE Medical Systems1996—
−7K020483Advantage Workstation 4.1GE Medical Systems20022
−6K023003Imagechecker-CT WorkstationR2 Technology, Inc.2002—
−5K032748VITREA2, Version 3.4 Medical Image Processing SoftwareVital Images, Inc.20032
−4K040305VITREA2 Version 3.5Vital Images, Inc.2004—
−3K043333VITREA2, Version 3.7 Medical Image Processing SystemVital Images, Inc.20041
−2K151283Lung Analysis SoftwareVital Images, Inc.2015—
−1K162484Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2017—
0 (this device)K201501VeolityMeVis Medical Solutions AG2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199440
199510
199630
199720
199830
199910
200020
200160
200230
200310
200410
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K201501, 1991–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OEB device

  1. #1 K254075 Synapse Lung Nodule AIscore 14.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K043617Imagechecker CT Cad Software System
Summary page 5
…005-1 3 Predicate Devices 510(k) Number Predicate Device Product Code K043617 ImageChecker CT CAD Software System OEB K023003 ImageChecker-CT Workstation…
Hologic, Inc.2007—
*K023003Imagechecker-CT Workstation
Summary page 5
…mber Predicate Device Product Code K043617 ImageChecker CT CAD Software System OEB K023003 ImageChecker-CT Workstation LLZ K040028 Comprehensive Chest Analysis To…
R2 Technology, Inc.2002—
*K040028CA-1500
Summary page 5
…43617 ImageChecker CT CAD Software System OEB K023003 ImageChecker-CT Workstation LLZ K040028 Comprehensive Chest Analysis Tools (C-CAT) LLZ 4 Reference Device 510(k) Number Refe…
R2 Technology, Inc.2004—
*K162484Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)
Summary page 5
…t Analysis Tools (C-CAT) LLZ 4 Reference Device 510(k) Number Reference Device Product Code K162484 Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option LLZ, JAK (LNA) 5 Device Desc…
Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2017—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 30 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 8 of the 38 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All OEB devices

OEB Lung Computed Tomography System, Computer-Aided Detection: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OEB

3in 2025

2007: 12015: 12016: 12020: 22021: 22022: 12023: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OEB

229in 2025

2025: 229 days median
2007high 229 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OEB

No recall names OEB since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OEB

No MAUDE report names OEB since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20151—00
20161—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20202—00
20212—00
20221—00
20232—00
20240—00
2025322900
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Veolity is intended to: display a composite view of 2D cross-sections, and 3D volumes of chest CT images, allow comparison between new and previous acquisitions as well as abnormal thoracic regions of interest, such as pulmonary nodules, provide Computer-Aided Detection (“CAD”) findings, which assist radiologists in the detection of solid pulmonary nodules between 4-30 mm in size in CT images with or without intravenous contrast. CAD is intended to be…

Read the full statement (212 words)

Veolity is intended to:

display a composite view of 2D cross-sections, and 3D volumes of chest CT images,

allow comparison between new and previous acquisitions as well as abnormal thoracic regions of interest, such as pulmonary nodules,

provide Computer-Aided Detection (“CAD”) findings, which assist radiologists in the detection of solid pulmonary nodules between 4-30 mm in size in CT images with or without intravenous contrast. CAD is intended to be used as an adjunct, alerting the radiologist — after his or her initial reading of the scan — to regions of interest that may have been initially overlooked.

The system can be used with any combination of these features. Enabling/disabling is handled via licensing or configuration options.

Intended Patient Population:

Veolity is an imaging software including computer assisted reading tools for reviewing CT examinations of the chest on an asymptomatic population.

Intended Conditions of Use:

As a software-only product, Veolity does not come into direct contact or indirect contact with patients, and it is neither a sterile device nor an in vitro diagnostic device. Additionally, the environmental and location requirements as defined for the hardware running Veolity apply. The software does not alter these requirements.

Intended User Profile:

Veolity is intended to be used by medical professionals (e.g., radiologists) with adequate training.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K201501: Veolity.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K201501

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026