510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

A View LCS

K201710510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 16, 2020115-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Oct 16, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K193220 (Coreline Soft Co., Ltd., 2020) after a 115-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1991.

Decided
Oct 16, 2020
Review
115 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K913770 (1991). 36 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 10 generations backK913770 Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co. · 1991
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK151283 Lung Analysis SoftwareVital Images, Inc. · 2015
  4. 2 generations backK162484 Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2017
  5. 1 generation backK193220 Aview LCSCoreline Soft Co., Ltd. · 2020
  6. This deviceK201710 A View LCSCoreline Soft Co., Ltd. · 2020
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK913770 Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co. · 1991
  2. 9 generations backK960613 GE Advantage Windows Review WorkstationGE Medical Systems · 1996
  3. 8 generations backK020483 Advantage Workstation 4.1GE Medical Systems · 2002 · Recalled
  4. 7 generations backK023003 Imagechecker-CT WorkstationR2 Technology, Inc. · 2002
  5. 6 generations backK032748 VITREA2, Version 3.4 Medical Image Processing SoftwareVital Images, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  6. 5 generations backK040305 VITREA2 Version 3.5Vital Images, Inc. · 2004
  7. 4 generations backK043333 VITREA2, Version 3.7 Medical Image Processing SystemVital Images, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  8. 3 generations backK151283 Lung Analysis SoftwareVital Images, Inc. · 2015
  9. 2 generations backK162484 Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2017
  10. 1 generation backK193220 Aview LCSCoreline Soft Co., Ltd. · 2020
  11. This deviceK201710 A View LCSCoreline Soft Co., Ltd. · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K913770Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co.1991—
−9K960613GE Advantage Windows Review WorkstationGE Medical Systems1996—
−8K020483Advantage Workstation 4.1GE Medical Systems20022
−7K023003Imagechecker-CT WorkstationR2 Technology, Inc.2002—
−6K032748VITREA2, Version 3.4 Medical Image Processing SoftwareVital Images, Inc.20032
−5K040305VITREA2 Version 3.5Vital Images, Inc.2004—
−4K043333VITREA2, Version 3.7 Medical Image Processing SystemVital Images, Inc.20041
−3K151283Lung Analysis SoftwareVital Images, Inc.2015—
−2K162484Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2017—
−1K193220Aview LCSCoreline Soft Co., Ltd.2020—
0 (this device)K201710A View LCSCoreline Soft Co., Ltd.2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199440
199510
199630
199720
199830
199910
200020
200160
200220
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K201710, 1991–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.6 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K193220Aview LCS
Summary page 5
…ation Name: System, image processing, radiological (21CFR 892.2050) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LLZ, JAK 3 PREDICATE DEVICE AVIEW LCS by Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. (K193220) Name of Device: AVIEW LCS Common or Usual Name: Image Processing Software Classification Name: System, image processing, radiolo…
Coreline Soft Co., Ltd.2020—
†K162484Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option (LNA)Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2017—
†K200714AVIEWCoreline Soft Co., Ltd.2020—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 29 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 8 of the 36 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

AVIEW LCS is intended for the review and analysis and reporting of thoracic CT images for the purpose of characterizing nodules in the lung in a single study, or over the time course of several thoracic studies. Characterizations include nodule type, location of the nodule and measurements such as size (major axis, minor axis), estimated effective diameter from the volume of the nodule, the volume of the nodule, Mean HU (the average value of the CT pixel…

Read the full statement (184 words)

AVIEW LCS is intended for the review and analysis and reporting of thoracic CT images for the purpose of characterizing nodules in the lung in a single study, or over the time course of several thoracic studies. Characterizations include nodule type, location of the nodule and measurements such as size (major axis, minor axis), estimated effective diameter from the volume of the nodule, the volume of the nodule, Mean HU (the average value of the CT pixel inside the nodule in HU), Minimum HU, Max HU, mass (mass calculated from the CT pixel value), and volumetric measures (Solid Major; length of the longest diameter measured in 3D for a solid portion of the nodule. Solid 2nd Major: The length of the longest diameter of the solid part, measured in sections perpendicular to the Major axis of the solid portion of the nodule), VDT (Volume doubling time), Lung-RADS (classification proposed to aid with findings) and CAC score and LAA analysis. The system automatically performs the measurement, allowing lung nodules and measurements to be displayed and, also integrate with FDA certified Mevis CAD (Computer-aided detection) (K043617).

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K201710: A View LCS.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K201710

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026