510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Zenition 70

K212813510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 1, 202128-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System

Cleared on Oct 1, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K183040 (Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V., 2018) after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 2004. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Oct 1, 2021
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OWB
Recalls
4
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K042646 (2004). 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK042646 DynactSiemens Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004
  2. 5 generations backK061685 PulseraPhilips Medical Systems North America Co. · 2006
  3. 4 generations backK090590 Veradius, Model 718-130Philips Medical Systems North America Co. · 2009
  4. 3 generations backK133819 VeradiusPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2014
  5. 2 generations backK142708 Veradius UnityPhilips Medical Systems Nethrlands BV · 2014 · Recalled
  6. 1 generation backK183040 Zenition 70Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2018 · Recalled
  7. This deviceK212813 Zenition 70Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2021
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK232420 Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2024
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK254205 Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2026
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK240224 Zenition 90Philips Medical Systems Nederlands B.V. · 2024

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K232420Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2024 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K254205Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K240224Zenition 90Philips Medical Systems Nederlands B.V. · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K042646DynactSiemens Medical Systems, Inc.2004—
−5K061685PulseraPhilips Medical Systems North America Co.2006—
−4K090590Veradius, Model 718-130Philips Medical Systems North America Co.2009—
−3K133819VeradiusPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2014—
−2K142708Veradius UnityPhilips Medical Systems Nethrlands BV20144
−1K183040Zenition 70Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.20185
0 (this device)K212813Zenition 70Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2021—
+1K232420Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2024—
+2K254205Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2026—
+1K240224Zenition 90Philips Medical Systems Nederlands B.V.2024—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202420
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K212813, 2004–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OWB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OWB device

  1. #1 K251602 Alphenix, INFX-8000V/B, INFX-8000V/S, V9.6…score 18.3 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K183040Zenition 70
Summary page 4
…Zenition 70 Manufacturer: Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. 510(k) Clearance: K183040 (December 6, 2018) Classification Name: Image intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system…
Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.20185
†K200218Digiscan FDXAllengers Medical Systems Limited2020—

Also cleared against K183040: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K232420Zenition 30Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.20241
K240224Zenition 90Philips Medical Systems Nederlands B.V.20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 25, 2025Class IIZ-1581-2025Labeling designA wireless foot switch pedal may get stuck in the active position when the user releases the pedal, resulting in the emission of unintended radiation.
Oct 7, 2024Class IIZ-0353-2025Under Investigation by firmPotential for the Mains Control Unit board fuse may blow out during system start-up or during a procedure.
Oct 4, 2023Class IIZ-0226-2024Device DesignPhilips has become aware of an issue with the Philips Integris-Allura, Allura Xper and Azurion systems that have been delivered to Puerto Rico without a warning label and the Source-to-Skin Distance Spacer (Tube-spacer) is missing.
Jul 20, 2023Class IIZ-1583-2025Software designPhilips has become aware of the potential for unintended radiation exposure with Zenition 70 systems with Vascular Extension option and a Wireless Foot Switch.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • 2 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K232420 (Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V., 2024) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K183040.

How does its category compare?

All OWB devices

OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OWB

22in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 92010: 72011: 62012: 62013: 112014: 152015: 112016: 162017: 202018: 232019: 92020: 162021: 242022: 212023: 122024: 132025: 222026 (partial year): 15
2007high 24 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OWB

148in 2025

2007: 52 days median2008: 135 days median2009: 99 days median2010: 66 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 37 days median2013: 119 days median2014: 158 days median2015: 66 days median2016: 103 days median2017: 76 days median2018: 54 days median2019: 174 days median2020: 53 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 90 days median2023: 152 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 148 days median2026 (partial year): 221 days median
2007high 221 (2026) · low 37 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OWB

42so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12013: 102014: 92015: 352016: 132017: 132018: 62019: 72020: 82021: 312022: 242023: 222024: 112025: 302026 (partial year): 42
2007high 42 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OWB

14,008in 2025

2007: 12011: 12012: 12013: 272014: 1032015: 2,1342016: 4,0742017: 1,6042018: 1,4492019: 1,5582020: 1,5812021: 1,9812022: 2,9322023: 7,6042024: 7,9422025: 14,008
2007high 14,008 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OWB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200735201
2008413510
200999900
201076600
201167901
201263701
2013111191027
2014151589103
20151166352,134
201616103134,074
20172076131,604
2018235461,449
2019917471,558
2020165381,581
20212460311,981
20222190242,932
202312152227,604
202413126117,942
2025221483014,008
20261522142—

What is it indicated for?

The proposed Zenition 70 is intended to be used and operated by: adequately trained, qualified and authorized health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device. The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients, except neonates (birth to one month), within the…

Read the full statement (112 words)

The proposed Zenition 70 is intended to be used and operated by: adequately trained, qualified and authorized health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device.

The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients, except neonates (birth to one month), within the limits of the device. The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures.

Applications:

* Orthopedic

* Neuro

* Abdominal

* Vascular

* Thoracic

* Cardiac

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K212813: Zenition 70.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K212813

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026