510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

NeuroMatch

K241390510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 26, 2024195-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.1400

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

LVIS Corporation · OMB Automatic Event Detection Software For Full-Montage Electroencephalograph

Cleared on Nov 26, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K182181 (Persyst Development Corporation, 2018) after a 195-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2018.

Decided
Nov 26, 2024
Review
195 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OMB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K182181 (2018). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK182181 Persyst 14 EEG Review and Analysis SoftwarePersyst Development Corporation · 2018
  2. This deviceK241390 NeuroMatchLVIS Corporation · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K182181Persyst 14 EEG Review and Analysis SoftwarePersyst Development Corporation2018—
0 (this device)K241390NeuroMatchLVIS Corporation2024—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K241390, 2018–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OMB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OMB device

  1. #1 K240993 encevis (2.1)score 15.0 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K182181Persyst 14 EEG Review and Analysis Software
Summary page 6
…Electroencephalograph (21CFR 882.1400) Device Class: II Product Code: OMB, OLT, OMA Predicate Device: Persyst 14, EEG Review and Analysis Software, K182181 Date Prepared: November 25, 2024 Device Description: NeuroMatch is a cloud-based software as a medical device (SaMD) intended t…
Persyst Development Corporation2018—
†K222450LVIS NeuroMatchLVIS Corporation2023—

Also cleared against K182181: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K182181.

How does its category compare?

All OMB devices

OMB Automatic Event Detection Software For Full-Montage Electroencephalograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OMB

5in 2025

2009: 12010: 12012: 12013: 12014: 22015: 32017: 12018: 32019: 12020: 12021: 12022: 12023: 22024: 52025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OMB

143in 2025

2015: 233 days median2018: 108 days median2024: 201 days median2025: 143 days median
2007high 233 (2015) · low 108 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OMB

1in 2021

2021: 1
2007high 1 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OMB

6in 2025

2011: 12014: 22022: 12023: 42024: 212025: 6
2007high 21 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OMB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20091—00
20101—00
20110—01
20121—00
20131—00
20142—02
2015323300
20160—00
20171—00
2018310800
20191—00
20201—00
20211—10
20221—01
20232—04
20245201021
2025514306
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

1. LVIS NeuroMatch Software is intended for the review, monitoring and analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings made by EEG devices using scalp electrodes and to aid neurologists in the assessment of EEG. The device is intended to be used by qualified medical practitioners who will exercise professional judgement in using the information. 2. The Seizure Detection component of LVIS NeuroMatch is intended to mark previously acquired sections of…

Read the full statement (354 words)

1. LVIS NeuroMatch Software is intended for the review, monitoring and analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings made by EEG devices using scalp electrodes and to aid neurologists in the assessment of EEG. The device is intended to be used by qualified medical practitioners who will exercise professional judgement in using the information.

2. The Seizure Detection component of LVIS NeuroMatch is intended to mark previously acquired sections of adult EEG recordings from patients greater than or equal to 18 years old that may correspond to electrographic seizures, in order to assist qualified medical practitioners in the assessment of EEG traces. EEG recordings should be obtained with a full scalp montage according to the electrodes from the International Standard 10-20 placement.

3. The Spike Detection component of LVIS NeuroMatch is intended to mark previously acquired sections of adult EEG recordings from patients ≥18 years old that may correspond to spikes, in order to assist qualified medical practitioners in the assessment of EEG traces. LVIS NeuroMatch Spike Detection performance has not been assessed for intracranial recordings.

4. LVIS NeuroMatch includes the calculation and display of a set of quantitative measures intended to monitor and analyze EEG waveforms. These include Artifact Strength, Asymmetry Spectrogram, Autocorrelation Spectrogram, and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Spectrogram. These quantitative EEG measures should always be interpreted in conjunction with review of the original EEG waveforms.

5. LVIS NeuroMatch displays physiological signals such as electrocardiogram (ECG/EKG) if it is provided in the EEG recording.

6. The aEEG functionality included in LVIS NeuroMatch is intended to monitor the state of the brain.

7. LVIS NeuroMatch Artifact Reduction (AR) is intended to reduce muscle and eye movements, in EEG signals from the International Standard 10-20 placement. AR does not remove the entire artifact signal and is not effective for other types of artifacts. AR may modify portions of waveforms representing cerebral activity. Waveforms must still be read by a qualified medical practitioner trained in recognizing artifacts, and any interpretation or diagnosis must be made with reference to the original waveforms.

8. This device does not provide any diagnostic conclusion about the patient’s condition to the user.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K241390: NeuroMatch.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K241390

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026